Resolving the conflict between traditional Islam and human rights: A comparative study of Mahmoud Mohammed Taha’s and Mohsen Kadivar’s views

IF 0.7 0 RELIGION

Critical Research on Religion Pub Date : 2021-05-12 DOI:10.1177/20503032211015293

M. Goudarzi

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the recent decades, many Muslim intellectuals have devoted their intellectual efforts to reconstructing the jurisprudence through a new interpretation of Islam in order to solve the problem of human rights. While they have mostly tried to find a solution based on Ijtihad in derivation of Shari’a, Mahmoud Mohammad Taha and Mohsen Kadivar have asked for structural Ijtihad, presenting reversed and rational abrogation theories. In the current article, the researcher aims to focus on three main questions: Why do they believe that traditional jurisprudence and Ijtihad in derivatives are not able to solve the conflict between Islam and human rights? What are the most important governing principles in the corrective theory of each thinker, and how can their proposed theories lead to the reconciliation of Islam and human rights? And finally, what are the most fundamental principles and common features that lie in the theory of the two thinkers?

查看原文本刊更多论文

解决传统伊斯兰教与人权的冲突——马哈茂德·穆罕默德·塔哈与莫森·卡迪瓦尔观点的比较研究

近几十年来，许多穆斯林知识分子致力于通过对伊斯兰教的新诠释来重构法理学，以解决人权问题。虽然他们大多试图找到一个基于伊斯兰教法衍生的伊智提哈德的解决方案，马哈茂德·穆罕默德·塔哈和莫森·卡迪瓦尔要求结构性的伊智提哈德，提出颠倒和理性的废除理论。在当前的文章中，研究者旨在关注三个主要问题:为什么他们认为传统法学和衍生的伊智提哈德不能解决伊斯兰教与人权之间的冲突?在每位思想家的纠正理论中，最重要的指导原则是什么?他们提出的理论如何导致伊斯兰教与人权的和解?最后，两位思想家的理论中最根本的原则和共同特征是什么?

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Critical Research on Religion RELIGION-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Research on Religion is a peer-reviewed, international journal focusing on the development of a critical theoretical framework and its application to research on religion. It provides a common venue for those engaging in critical analysis in theology and religious studies, as well as for those who critically study religion in the other social sciences and humanities such as philosophy, sociology, anthropology, psychology, history, and literature. A critical approach examines religious phenomena according to both their positive and negative impacts. It draws on methods including but not restricted to the critical theory of the Frankfurt School, Marxism, post-structuralism, feminism, psychoanalysis, ideological criticism, post-colonialism, ecocriticism, and queer studies. The journal seeks to enhance an understanding of how religious institutions and religious thought may simultaneously serve as a source of domination and progressive social change. It attempts to understand the role of religion within social and political conflicts. These conflicts are often based on differences of race, class, ethnicity, region, gender, and sexual orientation – all of which are shaped by social, political, and economic inequity. The journal encourages submissions of theoretically guided articles on current issues as well as those with historical interest using a wide range of methodologies including qualitative, quantitative, and archival. It publishes articles, review essays, book reviews, thematic issues, symposia, and interviews.