Disaster Risk Governance in Bangladesh: How Do NGOs Find Themselves in the Network?

IF 1.3 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Liam Johnson, M. Swapan, M. Ashikuzzaman
{"title":"Disaster Risk Governance in Bangladesh: How Do NGOs Find Themselves in the Network?","authors":"Liam Johnson, M. Swapan, M. Ashikuzzaman","doi":"10.1177/09754253211040205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The roles and responsibilities of state-led organizations have remained the primary focus of disaster risk governance (DRG) literature. While integration of NGOs into formal disaster risk reduction (DRR) has been persistently promoted by the recent United Nations’ DRG frameworks to support state interventions, the low uptake of embracing core principles of DRR by NGOs is noted. Tension within network governance of DRG, including state and non-governmental actors, is also reported by several scholars, particularly in developing countries, but has not been investigated empirically with greater details. To contribute to this research agenda, the study aims to explore how NGOs perceive and value their contributions to DRG. Based on a structured questionnaire survey with development activists (DAs) from NGOs in the southwest coastal region of Bangladesh, the study found that reactive interventions (emergency response and post-disaster support) by them was perceived to be the most critical focus of DRG despite changing theoretical and global perspectives towards pre-disaster preparedness and mitigative measures. Vertical network governance was favoured within NGOs’ own networks outside the state’s direct supervision, identifying a critical role played by local NGOs. The capacity of leadership of NGOs was promoted by the respondents who worked in decision-making positions within their organizations, whilst professionals with lack of experience within the NGO sector tended to favour state actors. The findings could be critical in understanding local capacities and in co-creating hazard specific plans using various stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":44690,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Urbanization ASIA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Urbanization ASIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09754253211040205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The roles and responsibilities of state-led organizations have remained the primary focus of disaster risk governance (DRG) literature. While integration of NGOs into formal disaster risk reduction (DRR) has been persistently promoted by the recent United Nations’ DRG frameworks to support state interventions, the low uptake of embracing core principles of DRR by NGOs is noted. Tension within network governance of DRG, including state and non-governmental actors, is also reported by several scholars, particularly in developing countries, but has not been investigated empirically with greater details. To contribute to this research agenda, the study aims to explore how NGOs perceive and value their contributions to DRG. Based on a structured questionnaire survey with development activists (DAs) from NGOs in the southwest coastal region of Bangladesh, the study found that reactive interventions (emergency response and post-disaster support) by them was perceived to be the most critical focus of DRG despite changing theoretical and global perspectives towards pre-disaster preparedness and mitigative measures. Vertical network governance was favoured within NGOs’ own networks outside the state’s direct supervision, identifying a critical role played by local NGOs. The capacity of leadership of NGOs was promoted by the respondents who worked in decision-making positions within their organizations, whilst professionals with lack of experience within the NGO sector tended to favour state actors. The findings could be critical in understanding local capacities and in co-creating hazard specific plans using various stakeholders.
孟加拉国的灾害风险治理:非政府组织如何在网络中找到自己?
国家领导的组织的作用和责任仍然是灾害风险治理文献的主要关注点。尽管最近联合国支持国家干预的灾害风险减少框架一直在推动非政府组织融入正式的灾害风险降低,但非政府组织对纳入灾害风险减少核心原则的接受率很低。一些学者,特别是发展中国家的学者,也报告了DRG网络治理内部的紧张关系,包括国家和非政府行为者,但尚未进行更详细的实证调查。为了促进这一研究议程,本研究旨在探讨非政府组织如何看待和重视其对DRG的贡献。根据对孟加拉国西南沿海地区非政府组织发展活动家的结构化问卷调查,该研究发现,尽管对灾前准备和缓解措施的理论和全球视角发生了变化,但他们的反应性干预措施(应急响应和灾后支持)被认为是DRG最关键的重点。垂直网络治理在国家直接监督之外的非政府组织自己的网络中受到青睐,这表明地方非政府组织发挥了关键作用。在非政府组织中担任决策职位的受访者提高了非政府组织的领导能力,而在非政府部门缺乏经验的专业人士则倾向于支持国家行为者。这些发现对于了解当地能力和利用各种利益攸关方共同制定针对特定危险的计划至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environment and Urbanization ASIA
Environment and Urbanization ASIA ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信