THE CARRYING CAPACITY ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OF LAND USE CHANGE AT BORDER ENTIKONG

R. Irsan, L. Muta’ali, S. Sudrajat
{"title":"THE CARRYING CAPACITY ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES OF LAND USE CHANGE AT BORDER ENTIKONG","authors":"R. Irsan, L. Muta’ali, S. Sudrajat","doi":"10.19184/GEOSI.V3I2.7896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entikong Region is located in Sanggau Regency, West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia, which is directly adjacent to Malaysia. Land use in the Border Area, which is massive and irregular, results in environmental degradation, deculturization, and lack of living standards of the community. High population growth in the border areas leads to excessive use of natural resources, and used land is not appropriately allocated. The land has limited function, and if the demand for the land is greater than the carrying capacity, there will be an imbalance that results in land degradation and its environment. The purpose of this study is to identify the type and extent of land function switch, analyze provider services as part of the Land Support Capacity Ecosystem services, and identify the Accuracy of Image Interpretation. The results showed that the increasing area of massive land use comes from a mixed plantation in 2017 increased by 60.6% of the total area of Entikong District. Degradation occurs in primary forest land use component which is only 18.6% of Entikong's total area in 2017. This indicates that the use of mixed plantation land acquires the protected forest, with many palm, rubber, and pepper. Similarly, the percentage of accuracy test from the interpretation result reaches 83.33% from 42 sample points in accordance with the real conditions. The Value of Clean Water Ecosystem Service Providers in 2011 was 0.36 and was 0.33 in 2017. Then within the period of almost 7 years, it is decreased by 0.03. Thus, the Ecosystem Service Index of clean water providers has a value less than 1, it means the function of the area as a provider of clean water is very small. Similarly, the Provider Ecosystem Services Index for Foodstuffs, the Value of Food Ecosystem Services Index in 2011 was 0.32 and was 0.31 in 2017, then within the nearly 7-year period, it is decreased by 0.01. The ecosystem services index as a food supply provider for the Entikong border area is very low (less than 1) which means the carrying capacity of the environment is not good enough for supplying food needs in Entikong. This indicates that there is a reduction in the availability of environmental services, and if it continues, then Environmental Assets declines sharply and services derived from nature will be lost or will be expensive in the near future. Thus, optimization and revitalization of land use are necessary by applying various policies related to development in the border area in Entikong District. \nKeywords: Borders, Land Use, Ecosystem Provider Services. \n  \nReferences \nAdmadhani, D. N., Hajil, A. H. S., & Susanawati, L. D. (2013). Analysis of Water Supply and Water Demand for Carrying Capacity Assessment ( Case Study of Malang ). Journal of Natural Resources and Environment. \nAsdak, C., & Salim, H. (2006). Water Resource Capacity As a Spatial Planning Consideration. Journal of Environmental Engineering P3TL-BPPT. \nErnan Rustiadi, Sunsus Saefulhakim, D. R. P. (2011). Planning and Regional Development. Restpent Press. \nGhozali. (2013). Referral of Land Use Utilization Through Ecological Footprint in Gresik Regency. Territory and Environment, 1 No.1, 67–78. \nHamidy, Z. (2003). Land Cover Change, Composition, and Life Type in Suakaidupan Cikepuh. Faculty of Forestry, IPB. \nMuta’ali, L. (2015). Regional Analysis Techniques For Regional Planning, Spatial Planning, and Environment (Februari). Yogyakarta: Faculty of Geography UGM. \nNational Standardization Department. (2010). Classification of Land Cover. \nPurwadhi. (2008). Introduction Remote Sensing Imagery Interpretation. Semarang: LAPAN. \nRiqqi, A. (2014). Design Concept Techniques Determination of Supporting Capacity and Capacity of the National Environment and Islands / Islands And Provinces. Bali: KLH. \nSaripin, I. (2003). Identify Land Use Using Landsat TM Imagery. Agricultural Engineering Bulletin. \nVarika. (2015). Monitoring of Ecosystem Service-Based Ecotourism (Recreation and Ecotourism) Capacity in 2000 and 2015 Using Landsat Image in Badung Regency, Bali. \nViska. (2012). Land Use Direction in Batu City Based on Ecological Ecosystem Approach. Pomits Technique, 1 No.1, 1–6. \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":33276,"journal":{"name":"Geosfera Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosfera Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19184/GEOSI.V3I2.7896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Entikong Region is located in Sanggau Regency, West Kalimantan Province, Indonesia, which is directly adjacent to Malaysia. Land use in the Border Area, which is massive and irregular, results in environmental degradation, deculturization, and lack of living standards of the community. High population growth in the border areas leads to excessive use of natural resources, and used land is not appropriately allocated. The land has limited function, and if the demand for the land is greater than the carrying capacity, there will be an imbalance that results in land degradation and its environment. The purpose of this study is to identify the type and extent of land function switch, analyze provider services as part of the Land Support Capacity Ecosystem services, and identify the Accuracy of Image Interpretation. The results showed that the increasing area of massive land use comes from a mixed plantation in 2017 increased by 60.6% of the total area of Entikong District. Degradation occurs in primary forest land use component which is only 18.6% of Entikong's total area in 2017. This indicates that the use of mixed plantation land acquires the protected forest, with many palm, rubber, and pepper. Similarly, the percentage of accuracy test from the interpretation result reaches 83.33% from 42 sample points in accordance with the real conditions. The Value of Clean Water Ecosystem Service Providers in 2011 was 0.36 and was 0.33 in 2017. Then within the period of almost 7 years, it is decreased by 0.03. Thus, the Ecosystem Service Index of clean water providers has a value less than 1, it means the function of the area as a provider of clean water is very small. Similarly, the Provider Ecosystem Services Index for Foodstuffs, the Value of Food Ecosystem Services Index in 2011 was 0.32 and was 0.31 in 2017, then within the nearly 7-year period, it is decreased by 0.01. The ecosystem services index as a food supply provider for the Entikong border area is very low (less than 1) which means the carrying capacity of the environment is not good enough for supplying food needs in Entikong. This indicates that there is a reduction in the availability of environmental services, and if it continues, then Environmental Assets declines sharply and services derived from nature will be lost or will be expensive in the near future. Thus, optimization and revitalization of land use are necessary by applying various policies related to development in the border area in Entikong District. Keywords: Borders, Land Use, Ecosystem Provider Services.   References Admadhani, D. N., Hajil, A. H. S., & Susanawati, L. D. (2013). Analysis of Water Supply and Water Demand for Carrying Capacity Assessment ( Case Study of Malang ). Journal of Natural Resources and Environment. Asdak, C., & Salim, H. (2006). Water Resource Capacity As a Spatial Planning Consideration. Journal of Environmental Engineering P3TL-BPPT. Ernan Rustiadi, Sunsus Saefulhakim, D. R. P. (2011). Planning and Regional Development. Restpent Press. Ghozali. (2013). Referral of Land Use Utilization Through Ecological Footprint in Gresik Regency. Territory and Environment, 1 No.1, 67–78. Hamidy, Z. (2003). Land Cover Change, Composition, and Life Type in Suakaidupan Cikepuh. Faculty of Forestry, IPB. Muta’ali, L. (2015). Regional Analysis Techniques For Regional Planning, Spatial Planning, and Environment (Februari). Yogyakarta: Faculty of Geography UGM. National Standardization Department. (2010). Classification of Land Cover. Purwadhi. (2008). Introduction Remote Sensing Imagery Interpretation. Semarang: LAPAN. Riqqi, A. (2014). Design Concept Techniques Determination of Supporting Capacity and Capacity of the National Environment and Islands / Islands And Provinces. Bali: KLH. Saripin, I. (2003). Identify Land Use Using Landsat TM Imagery. Agricultural Engineering Bulletin. Varika. (2015). Monitoring of Ecosystem Service-Based Ecotourism (Recreation and Ecotourism) Capacity in 2000 and 2015 Using Landsat Image in Badung Regency, Bali. Viska. (2012). Land Use Direction in Batu City Based on Ecological Ecosystem Approach. Pomits Technique, 1 No.1, 1–6.    
边境地区土地利用变化对生态系统服务的承载力
恩提孔地区位于印度尼西亚西加里曼丹省的Sanggau县,与马来西亚直接相邻。边境地区土地利用的大规模和不规则性导致了环境退化、非文化化和社区生活水平的低下。边境地区人口增长过快,导致资源过度利用,土地分配不合理。土地的功能是有限的,如果对土地的需求大于其承载能力,就会出现不平衡,导致土地退化及其环境。本研究的目的是识别土地功能转换的类型和程度,分析提供者服务作为土地支持能力生态系统服务的一部分,并确定图像解译的准确性。结果表明:2017年恩恩孔区大规模土地利用面积增加主要来自混合人工林,增加面积占该区总面积的60.6%;2017年,恩蒂孔市的原始林地利用部分发生退化,仅占总面积的18.6%。这表明使用混合种植园的土地获得了受保护的森林,有许多棕榈、橡胶和胡椒。同样,42个样本点对解译结果的准确率检验达到83.33%,符合实际情况。2011年清洁水生态系统服务提供者的价值为0.36,2017年为0.33。然后在近7年的时间里,下降了0.03。因此,洁净水供给者生态系统服务指数小于1,说明该区域作为洁净水供给者的功能很小。同样,食品供应商生态系统服务指数,2011年为0.32,2017年为0.31,近7年间下降了0.01。作为恩恩孔边境地区粮食供应提供者的生态系统服务指数很低(小于1),表明环境的承载能力不足以满足恩恩孔地区的粮食需求。这表明环境服务的可得性正在减少,如果这种情况继续下去,那么环境资产将急剧减少,来自大自然的服务将在不久的将来丧失或变得昂贵。因此,优化和振兴土地使用是必要的,通过应用与恩提孔区边境地区发展有关的各种政策。关键词:边界,土地利用,生态系统提供者服务Admadhani, D. N, Hajil, A. H. S, and Susanawati, L. D.(2013)。承载能力评价中的供需分析(以麻郎为例)。自然资源与环境学报。Asdak, C, and Salim, H.(2006)。水资源容量作为空间规划的考虑。环境工程学报[j]。Ernan Rustiadi, Sunsus Saefulhakim, d.r.p.(2011)。规划及区域发展。Restpent出版社。Ghozali。(2013)。基于生态足迹的Gresik县域土地利用参考研究。国土与环境,1(1),67-78。Hamidy, Z.(2003)。苏阿凯都潘慈克普土地覆盖变化、组成与生命类型IPB林业学院。穆塔阿里,L.(2015)。区域规划、空间规划和环境的区域分析技术(2月)。日惹:澳门大学地理学系。国家标准化司。(2010)。土地覆盖分类。Purwadhi。(2008)。遥感图像解译。一直以来:拉潘。李琪,A.(2014)。国家环境与岛屿/岛屿与省份的承载力与承载力的设计概念、技术确定。巴厘岛:KLH。萨里平,I.(2003)。利用Landsat TM影像识别土地用途。农业工程通报。Varika。(2015)。巴厘巴东县2000年和2015年基于生态系统服务的生态旅游(游憩和生态旅游)能力的Landsat图像监测Viska。(2012)。基于生态系统方法的巴都市土地利用方向研究极限技巧,1,1,1 - 6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信