Evaluation of Micro and Macro-level Coherence of Students Argumentative Essays in ESAWEEK Writing Competition

Shofyatul Fuadiyah, Sri Wuli Fitriati, Widhiyanto Widhiyanto
{"title":"Evaluation of Micro and Macro-level Coherence of Students Argumentative Essays in ESAWEEK Writing Competition","authors":"Shofyatul Fuadiyah, Sri Wuli Fitriati, Widhiyanto Widhiyanto","doi":"10.15294/eej.v12i1.54523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most important aspects of writing a meaningful text is to achieve its coherence within the text. This study evaluated students' argumentative essays' micro and macro-level coherence in the ESA WEEK writing competition. This research is a qualitative study in the form of a discourse analysis approach by using the theory through the lens of micro and macro-level coherence (Thornburry, 2005). This study reveals several findings. Almost all the texts are sufficient to have good logical relations. The most frequent connections are additive and causal ties. In terms of logical relationships, the most frequent pattern in the texts was the zig-zag pattern, and the rarely used was the multiple rheme pattern. Even though all patterns were in texts, some rogue sentences were still found in each text. The keywords could represent the texts' topic or theme in almost every paragraph. It made readers guess the main issue quickly. Some writers could build a schema well, but others could not. Most of the texts organized in argumentative essays structure has Introduction-Body-Conclusion. This study can be used as a consideration to write meaningful and coherent text and references in the same field of discourse analysis.","PeriodicalId":30982,"journal":{"name":"English Education Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v12i1.54523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most important aspects of writing a meaningful text is to achieve its coherence within the text. This study evaluated students' argumentative essays' micro and macro-level coherence in the ESA WEEK writing competition. This research is a qualitative study in the form of a discourse analysis approach by using the theory through the lens of micro and macro-level coherence (Thornburry, 2005). This study reveals several findings. Almost all the texts are sufficient to have good logical relations. The most frequent connections are additive and causal ties. In terms of logical relationships, the most frequent pattern in the texts was the zig-zag pattern, and the rarely used was the multiple rheme pattern. Even though all patterns were in texts, some rogue sentences were still found in each text. The keywords could represent the texts' topic or theme in almost every paragraph. It made readers guess the main issue quickly. Some writers could build a schema well, but others could not. Most of the texts organized in argumentative essays structure has Introduction-Body-Conclusion. This study can be used as a consideration to write meaningful and coherent text and references in the same field of discourse analysis.
ESAWEEK写作竞赛学生议论文微观与宏观连贯性评价
要写出一篇有意义的文章,最重要的一个方面是在文章中实现连贯。本研究评估了ESA WEEK写作比赛中学生议论文的微观和宏观层面的连贯性。本研究采用语篇分析法的形式,通过微观和宏观层面的连贯视角运用理论进行定性研究(thornbury, 2005)。这项研究揭示了几个发现。几乎所有的文本都足以具有良好的逻辑关系。最常见的联系是加法和因果关系。在逻辑关系方面,文本中使用频率最高的是“之”字模式,使用频率最低的是“多”字模式。尽管所有的模式都在文本中,但仍然在每个文本中发现了一些流氓句子。关键词几乎可以代表文本的每一段的主题或主题。它让读者很快猜到了主要问题。有些作家可以很好地构建一个图式,但其他人不能。大多数议论文的结构是引言-主体-结论。本研究可作为在同一话语分析领域中撰写有意义且连贯的语篇和参考文献的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信