One Year Clinical Evaluation Of Translucent Zirconia Crowns In Dental Esthetic Zone With Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique Versus Conventional Preparation (RCT)

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Kareem Talaat, Amina Zaki, Samaa Kotb, Rasha Sami
{"title":"One Year Clinical Evaluation Of Translucent Zirconia Crowns In Dental Esthetic Zone With Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique Versus Conventional Preparation (RCT)","authors":"Kareem Talaat, Amina Zaki, Samaa Kotb, Rasha Sami","doi":"10.47750/pnr.2022.13.s08.511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statement of the problem: Tooth preparation with horizontal finish line requires removal of reasonable amount of tooth structure at the cervical area which affects the remaining tooth structure at this area. Therefore, more conservative preparation design such as biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT) might be needed to save tooth structure at the cervical area.\nThe Purpose: To Evaluate the effect of Conventional preparation design (horizontal), and Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique (BOPT), on Marginal adaptation, fracture and gingival inflammation score of the translucent zirconia crown in dental esthetic zone.\nMethodology:, 44 monolithic translucent zirconia single crowns were fabricated inn dental esthetic zone . The patients were separated randomly into two groups. Group1: (horizontal preparation design) Group2: BOPT. After final cementation. The Modified United States Public Health Service (MUSPH) criteria for restoration clinical evaluations were used to assess marginal adaption. Gingival inflammation was assessed using gingival inflammation index. Evaluation of the restoration was at intervals of three, six, nine, and twelve months.\nResults: Comparison between two groups at different intervals regarding marginal adaptation, fracture and gingival inflammation score revealed statistically insignificant difference.\nConclusions: Within limitations of the present one year follow up randomized clinical trial, the following conclusions could be drawn:\n1.The conventional and BOPT preparation designs both clinically accepted to provide successful dental restoration\n\nThe lower gingival inflammation score of the restored teeth with the conventional preparation design compared to that of the BOPT, may not be conclusive as regard the study time frame, indicating that increasing the follow-up period might alter the present finding.\n\nClinical implications: Beyond of all the prosthodontic preparation techniques, knowledge of B.O.P.T. (Biological Oriented Preparation Technique) allows us to achieve predictable and consistent results in terms of periodontal health and gingiva architecture surrounding ceramic restoration. Nevertheless, long term studies are necessary to ensure the benefits of this techniques.","PeriodicalId":16728,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.s08.511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of the problem: Tooth preparation with horizontal finish line requires removal of reasonable amount of tooth structure at the cervical area which affects the remaining tooth structure at this area. Therefore, more conservative preparation design such as biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT) might be needed to save tooth structure at the cervical area. The Purpose: To Evaluate the effect of Conventional preparation design (horizontal), and Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique (BOPT), on Marginal adaptation, fracture and gingival inflammation score of the translucent zirconia crown in dental esthetic zone. Methodology:, 44 monolithic translucent zirconia single crowns were fabricated inn dental esthetic zone . The patients were separated randomly into two groups. Group1: (horizontal preparation design) Group2: BOPT. After final cementation. The Modified United States Public Health Service (MUSPH) criteria for restoration clinical evaluations were used to assess marginal adaption. Gingival inflammation was assessed using gingival inflammation index. Evaluation of the restoration was at intervals of three, six, nine, and twelve months. Results: Comparison between two groups at different intervals regarding marginal adaptation, fracture and gingival inflammation score revealed statistically insignificant difference. Conclusions: Within limitations of the present one year follow up randomized clinical trial, the following conclusions could be drawn: 1.The conventional and BOPT preparation designs both clinically accepted to provide successful dental restoration The lower gingival inflammation score of the restored teeth with the conventional preparation design compared to that of the BOPT, may not be conclusive as regard the study time frame, indicating that increasing the follow-up period might alter the present finding. Clinical implications: Beyond of all the prosthodontic preparation techniques, knowledge of B.O.P.T. (Biological Oriented Preparation Technique) allows us to achieve predictable and consistent results in terms of periodontal health and gingiva architecture surrounding ceramic restoration. Nevertheless, long term studies are necessary to ensure the benefits of this techniques.
生物定向制备技术与常规制备技术在口腔美观区半透明氧化锆冠1年临床评价(RCT)
问题陈述:水平终点线预备牙需要在颈椎区域去除合理数量的牙齿结构,这会影响该区域剩余的牙齿结构。因此,可能需要更保守的预备设计,如生物定向预备技术(BOPT),以保存颈椎区域的牙齿结构。目的:评价常规制备设计(水平)和生物定向制备技术(BOPT)对口腔美观区半透明氧化锆冠边缘适应、断裂和牙龈炎症评分的影响。方法:在口腔美观区制作44个整体半透明氧化锆单冠。患者随机分为两组。组1:(水平制备设计)组2:BOPT。最后胶结后。采用改良的美国公共卫生服务(MUSPH)修复临床评估标准来评估边缘适应。采用牙龈炎症指数评估牙龈炎症。修复的评估间隔为3个月、6个月、9个月和12个月。结果:两组在不同时间间隔的边缘适应、骨折、牙龈炎症评分比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论:在目前为期一年的随机随访临床试验的限制下,可以得出以下结论:常规和BOPT制备设计均被临床认可为提供成功的牙齿修复。与BOPT相比,常规制备设计修复的牙齿牙龈炎症评分较低,在研究时间框架方面可能不是决定性的,表明增加随访时间可能会改变目前的发现。临床意义:在所有修复准备技术之外,B.O.P.T.(生物定向准备技术)的知识使我们能够在牙周健康和牙龈结构方面获得可预测和一致的结果。然而,长期的研究是必要的,以确保这种技术的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信