Factors affecting the accuracy of molecular delimitation in minute herbivorous mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea)

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Yue Yin, Yue Hu, Zi-Kai Shao, L. Yao, Ni Li, P. Hebert, X. Xue
{"title":"Factors affecting the accuracy of molecular delimitation in minute herbivorous mites (Acari: Eriophyoidea)","authors":"Yue Yin, Yue Hu, Zi-Kai Shao, L. Yao, Ni Li, P. Hebert, X. Xue","doi":"10.1111/zsc.12612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Single‐locus molecular delimitation plays a key role in meeting the need to expedite the exploration and description of the species on our planet. Multiple methods have been developed to aid data interpretation over the past 20 years, but species delimitation remains difficult due to their varying performance. In this study, we examine the accuracy of five widely used delimitation methods (i.e. BIN, ABGD, ASAP, GMYC and mPTP) in analysing 63 empirical data sets that included 1850 mitochondrial COI sequences derived from eriophyoid mites assigned to 456 morphospecies. Our results establish that all five methods resolve approximately 90% of morphospecies. We investigated some factors which might affect the species delimitation results, that is taxonomic rank, number of haplotypes per species, mean number of host plants per species, and geographical distance among sampling sites. We found complex interactions between these factors which affected delimitation effectiveness. An increase in haplotype number negatively affected delimitation accuracy, while increased geographical distance improved delimitation accuracy. BIN was influenced by the number of host plants per species as cryptic speciation linked to host plant usage might be prevalent in eriophyoid mites, while ABGD was not significantly impacted by other factors. Our results highlight multiple factors that affect molecular species delimitation and underline the value of employing multiple analytical approaches to aid species delimitation.","PeriodicalId":49334,"journal":{"name":"Zoologica Scripta","volume":"52 1","pages":"531 - 542"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoologica Scripta","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12612","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Single‐locus molecular delimitation plays a key role in meeting the need to expedite the exploration and description of the species on our planet. Multiple methods have been developed to aid data interpretation over the past 20 years, but species delimitation remains difficult due to their varying performance. In this study, we examine the accuracy of five widely used delimitation methods (i.e. BIN, ABGD, ASAP, GMYC and mPTP) in analysing 63 empirical data sets that included 1850 mitochondrial COI sequences derived from eriophyoid mites assigned to 456 morphospecies. Our results establish that all five methods resolve approximately 90% of morphospecies. We investigated some factors which might affect the species delimitation results, that is taxonomic rank, number of haplotypes per species, mean number of host plants per species, and geographical distance among sampling sites. We found complex interactions between these factors which affected delimitation effectiveness. An increase in haplotype number negatively affected delimitation accuracy, while increased geographical distance improved delimitation accuracy. BIN was influenced by the number of host plants per species as cryptic speciation linked to host plant usage might be prevalent in eriophyoid mites, while ABGD was not significantly impacted by other factors. Our results highlight multiple factors that affect molecular species delimitation and underline the value of employing multiple analytical approaches to aid species delimitation.
影响微小草食性螨分子划界准确性的因素(Acari:Eriophyoidea)
单位点分子划界在满足加快对地球上物种的探索和描述的需要方面起着关键作用。在过去的20年中,已经开发了多种方法来帮助解释数据,但由于其不同的性能,物种划分仍然很困难。在这项研究中,我们检验了五种广泛使用的划分方法(即BIN, ABGD, ASAP, GMYC和mPTP)的准确性,并分析了63个经验数据集,其中包括来自456个形态种的1850个线粒体COI序列。我们的研究结果表明,所有五种方法都可以解决大约90%的形态物种。研究了可能影响物种划界结果的因素,包括分类等级、单倍型数量、寄主植物数量和采样点之间的地理距离。我们发现这些影响划界有效性的因素之间存在复杂的相互作用。单倍型数量的增加对定界精度有负面影响,而地理距离的增加提高了定界精度。BIN受每个物种寄主植物数量的影响,因为与寄主植物利用有关的隐物种形成可能普遍存在于类羽翼螨中,而ABGD不受其他因素的显著影响。我们的研究结果强调了影响分子物种划界的多种因素,并强调了采用多种分析方法来辅助物种划界的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zoologica Scripta
Zoologica Scripta 生物-动物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zoologica Scripta publishes papers in animal systematics and phylogeny, i.e. studies of evolutionary relationships among taxa, and the origin and evolution of biological diversity. Papers can also deal with ecological interactions and geographic distributions (phylogeography) if the results are placed in a wider phylogenetic/systematic/evolutionary context. Zoologica Scripta encourages papers on the development of methods for all aspects of phylogenetic inference and biological nomenclature/classification. Articles published in Zoologica Scripta must be original and present either theoretical or empirical studies of interest to a broad audience in systematics and phylogeny. Purely taxonomic papers, like species descriptions without being placed in a wider systematic/phylogenetic context, will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信