Post-Auschwitz Dramaturgy: Toward the Later Edward Bond

IF 0.4 2区 艺术学 0 THEATER
MODERN DRAMA Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.3138/md-65-3-1121
Chien‐Cheng Chen
{"title":"Post-Auschwitz Dramaturgy: Toward the Later Edward Bond","authors":"Chien‐Cheng Chen","doi":"10.3138/md-65-3-1121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Although British playwright Edward Bond is well known for his early plays during the 1960s–80s, his later works, from the late 1990s onward, have been relatively overlooked and underexplored. In this article, I aim to bridge these two phases and propose a theoretical framework to approach Bond’s evolution as a playwright. I will first examine Bond’s critical engagement with Brecht, and then I will proceed to analyse Bond’s evolving dramaturgy of the Holocaust, which will help to demonstrate how Bond has developed what we might call his post-Auschwitz dramaturgy. While criticizing Brecht’s theatre for being the “Theatre of Auschwitz,” Bond bases his post-Brechtian dramaturgy on his specific understanding of the infamous Nazi concentration camp. Bond regards Auschwitz as not only a localized historical event but also a trans-historical structure of biopolitics, manifested in both the camp and an ensuing neoliberal capitalist system. By drawing on two pivotal passages of the Palermo improvisation (which took place in 1983) and the Russian guard’s story, both of which Bond describes in “Commentary on The War Plays” (1991), I will elucidate how these examples herald a “ post-Auschwitz” dramaturgical model that can be understood through Emmanuel Levi-nas’s ethics and Giorgio Agamben’s biopolitics. Building on this analysis, I will analyse Bond’s plays The Crime of the Twenty-First Century (1999) and Born (2006) to argue that it is the dissonance between the biopolitical paradigm exemplified in Auschwitz and the human subject’s fundamental creativity that defines Bond’s later works.","PeriodicalId":43301,"journal":{"name":"MODERN DRAMA","volume":"65 1","pages":"429 - 448"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN DRAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/md-65-3-1121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:Although British playwright Edward Bond is well known for his early plays during the 1960s–80s, his later works, from the late 1990s onward, have been relatively overlooked and underexplored. In this article, I aim to bridge these two phases and propose a theoretical framework to approach Bond’s evolution as a playwright. I will first examine Bond’s critical engagement with Brecht, and then I will proceed to analyse Bond’s evolving dramaturgy of the Holocaust, which will help to demonstrate how Bond has developed what we might call his post-Auschwitz dramaturgy. While criticizing Brecht’s theatre for being the “Theatre of Auschwitz,” Bond bases his post-Brechtian dramaturgy on his specific understanding of the infamous Nazi concentration camp. Bond regards Auschwitz as not only a localized historical event but also a trans-historical structure of biopolitics, manifested in both the camp and an ensuing neoliberal capitalist system. By drawing on two pivotal passages of the Palermo improvisation (which took place in 1983) and the Russian guard’s story, both of which Bond describes in “Commentary on The War Plays” (1991), I will elucidate how these examples herald a “ post-Auschwitz” dramaturgical model that can be understood through Emmanuel Levi-nas’s ethics and Giorgio Agamben’s biopolitics. Building on this analysis, I will analyse Bond’s plays The Crime of the Twenty-First Century (1999) and Born (2006) to argue that it is the dissonance between the biopolitical paradigm exemplified in Auschwitz and the human subject’s fundamental creativity that defines Bond’s later works.
后奥斯威辛戏剧:走向后来的爱德华·邦德
摘要:尽管英国剧作家爱德华·邦德在20世纪60年代至80年代以其早期戏剧而闻名,但从20世纪90年代末开始,他的后期作品却相对被忽视和发掘不足。在这篇文章中,我的目的是弥合这两个阶段,并提出一个理论框架来探讨邦德作为剧作家的演变。我将首先研究邦德与布莱希特的批判性接触,然后我将继续分析邦德对大屠杀不断演变的戏剧,这将有助于展示邦德是如何发展出我们可以称之为他的后奥斯威辛戏剧的。在批评布莱希特的剧院是“奥斯威辛剧院”的同时,邦德的后布莱希特戏剧创作建立在他对臭名昭著的纳粹集中营的具体理解之上。邦德认为奥斯威辛不仅是一个局部的历史事件,而且是一个跨历史的生物政治结构,表现在集中营和随后的新自由主义资本主义体系中。邦德在《战争剧评论》(1991年)中描述了巴勒莫即兴创作(发生在1983年)和俄罗斯卫队的故事中的两个关键段落,我将通过这两个段落来阐明这些例子如何预示着一种“后奥斯威辛”的戏剧模式,这种模式可以通过埃马纽埃尔·列维·纳斯的伦理学和乔治·阿甘本的传记政治来理解。在此分析的基础上,我将分析邦德的戏剧《二十一世纪之罪》(1999年)和《出生》(2006年),认为正是奥斯威辛集中营所体现的生物政治范式与人类主体的基本创造力之间的不和谐,定义了邦德后来的作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MODERN DRAMA
MODERN DRAMA THEATER-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信