Perceptions of Corruption: An Empirical Study Controlling for Survey Bias

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS
Klaus S. Friesenbichler, Eva Selenko, G. Clarke
{"title":"Perceptions of Corruption: An Empirical Study Controlling for Survey Bias","authors":"Klaus S. Friesenbichler, Eva Selenko, G. Clarke","doi":"10.1177/0260107917723787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Survey data on corruption are widely used to construct corruption indices, but are hardly questioned. How do individual experiences shape perceptions of corruption? Do more work-engaged respondents perceive corruption as a bigger obstacle to business operations than others? What role does answer bias play in corruption surveys? This article brings together several strands of literature to discuss these questions, and tests them empirically with survey data from Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. We find that individuals who are more work engaged report corruption as a bigger obstacle. So did respondents who were previously exposed to corruption. We control for possible answer bias by implementing a randomized response technique, and find that corruption tends to be under-reported. The effects of work engagement and prior exposure to corruption are more pronounced when the bias indicator is considered, and again become stronger once we control for answer bias affecting past experiences with corruption. JEL: C83, D03, D73, O12","PeriodicalId":42664,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0260107917723787","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0260107917723787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Survey data on corruption are widely used to construct corruption indices, but are hardly questioned. How do individual experiences shape perceptions of corruption? Do more work-engaged respondents perceive corruption as a bigger obstacle to business operations than others? What role does answer bias play in corruption surveys? This article brings together several strands of literature to discuss these questions, and tests them empirically with survey data from Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. We find that individuals who are more work engaged report corruption as a bigger obstacle. So did respondents who were previously exposed to corruption. We control for possible answer bias by implementing a randomized response technique, and find that corruption tends to be under-reported. The effects of work engagement and prior exposure to corruption are more pronounced when the bias indicator is considered, and again become stronger once we control for answer bias affecting past experiences with corruption. JEL: C83, D03, D73, O12
腐败认知:控制调查偏差的实证研究
腐败调查数据被广泛用于构建腐败指数,但很少受到质疑。个人经历如何塑造对腐败的看法?是否有更多从事工作的受访者认为腐败是企业运营的更大障碍?答案偏见在腐败调查中扮演什么角色?本文汇集了几股文献来讨论这些问题,并通过孟加拉国和斯里兰卡的调查数据进行实证检验。我们发现,从事更多工作的个人认为腐败是一个更大的障碍。之前有过腐败经历的受访者也是如此。我们通过实施随机反应技术来控制可能的答案偏差,并发现腐败倾向于被低估。当考虑到偏见指标时,工作投入和先前接触腐败的影响更为明显,一旦我们控制了影响过去腐败经历的答案偏见,这种影响再次变得更强。Jel: c83, d03, d73, o12
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: The explosion of information and research that has taken place in recent years has had a profound effect upon a variety of existing academic disciplines giving rise to the dissolution of barriers between some, mergers between others, and the creation of entirely new fields of enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信