Conversion of open varicose veins surgery unit into a modern one-stop shop endo-venous unit: strategies and cost-effectiveness

IF 0.2 Q4 SURGERY
M. Elkassaby, A. Hassanin, A. Elmallah
{"title":"Conversion of open varicose veins surgery unit into a modern one-stop shop endo-venous unit: strategies and cost-effectiveness","authors":"M. Elkassaby, A. Hassanin, A. Elmallah","doi":"10.4103/ejs.ejs_73_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose to provide a road map for converting varicose veins service to endovenous ablation and assess its process and outcome on patients with varicose veins. Patients and methods Retrospective assessment of prospectively recorded data for converting vein unit which exclusively did open varicose veins surgery (OS) (39 patients from September 2019 to February 2020) to endovenous radiofrequency ablation (ERFA) service (44 patients from March 2020 to January 2021). Results There was no statistical difference in theatre time between both interventions despite dealing with more complex cases in the ERFA group with more truncal veins (χ2=11.950FNx01, P<0.001FNx01) and a higher number of stab avulsions (V number) (χ2=217.889, P<0.001FNx01). On the other hand, the overall cost was significantly lower in open group compared to ERFA (Mean±SD 1261±386 US$ and 1519.2±392 US$ respectively, P<0.001FNx01. This statistical difference was reduced to P=0.041 when subgroup analysis only included cases with higher number of avulsions. In multivariate analysis, cost was associated with surgical duration and using ERFA however, less complications were recorded in ERFA group (χ2=4.419FNx01 P=0.036FNx01) and recovery time was significantly longer in open group (8.90±2.44) than in ERFA group (6.0±1.06), P<0.001FNx01 Conclusion Converting varicose veins service to a modern ERFA is safe and effective when properly planned. ERFA is associated with shorter recovery and less theatre time and complications despite higher cost which becomes more cost-effective in cases with more truncal veins and avulsion sites.","PeriodicalId":43393,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Surgery","volume":"42 1","pages":"409 - 417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_73_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose to provide a road map for converting varicose veins service to endovenous ablation and assess its process and outcome on patients with varicose veins. Patients and methods Retrospective assessment of prospectively recorded data for converting vein unit which exclusively did open varicose veins surgery (OS) (39 patients from September 2019 to February 2020) to endovenous radiofrequency ablation (ERFA) service (44 patients from March 2020 to January 2021). Results There was no statistical difference in theatre time between both interventions despite dealing with more complex cases in the ERFA group with more truncal veins (χ2=11.950FNx01, P<0.001FNx01) and a higher number of stab avulsions (V number) (χ2=217.889, P<0.001FNx01). On the other hand, the overall cost was significantly lower in open group compared to ERFA (Mean±SD 1261±386 US$ and 1519.2±392 US$ respectively, P<0.001FNx01. This statistical difference was reduced to P=0.041 when subgroup analysis only included cases with higher number of avulsions. In multivariate analysis, cost was associated with surgical duration and using ERFA however, less complications were recorded in ERFA group (χ2=4.419FNx01 P=0.036FNx01) and recovery time was significantly longer in open group (8.90±2.44) than in ERFA group (6.0±1.06), P<0.001FNx01 Conclusion Converting varicose veins service to a modern ERFA is safe and effective when properly planned. ERFA is associated with shorter recovery and less theatre time and complications despite higher cost which becomes more cost-effective in cases with more truncal veins and avulsion sites.
将开放性静脉曲张手术单位转变为现代一站式静脉内单位:策略和成本效益
目的为将静脉曲张服务转化为静脉内消融术提供路线图,并评估其对静脉曲张患者的治疗过程和结果。患者和方法前瞻性记录数据的回顾性评估,将专门进行静脉曲张开放手术(OS)的静脉单位(2019年9月至2020年2月,39名患者)转换为静脉内射频消融(ERFA)服务(2020年3月至2021年1月,44名患者)。结果尽管ERFA组处理了更复杂的病例,但两种干预措施的手术时间没有统计学差异,ERFA组有更多的干静脉(χ2=11.950FNx01,P<0.0001FNx01)和更高的刺伤撕裂次数(V数)(χ2=217.889,P<0.0001PNx01),开放组的总成本显著低于ERFA(平均值±SD分别为1261±386美元和1519.2±392美元,P<0.001FNx01)。当亚组分析仅包括撕脱次数较多的病例时,这一统计差异降至P=0.041。在多变量分析中,费用与手术时间和使用ERFA有关。然而,ERFA组的并发症较少(χ2=4.419FNx01 P=0.036FNx01),开放组的恢复时间(8.90±2.44)明显长于ERFA组(6.0±1.06),P<0.001FNx01。ERFA与更短的恢复期、更少的手术时间和并发症有关,尽管成本更高,但在干静脉和撕脱部位较多的情况下,这变得更具成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书