Determinación de la calidad del semen criopreservado con lecitina de soya o yema de huevo, en machos cabríos

IF 0.3 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES
S. Moreno-Avalos, F. G. Véliz-Deras, Guadalupe Calderón-Leyva, Viridiana Contreras-Villarreal, J. M. Guillen-Muñoz, Oscar Ángel-García
{"title":"Determinación de la calidad del semen criopreservado con lecitina de soya o yema de huevo, en machos cabríos","authors":"S. Moreno-Avalos, F. G. Véliz-Deras, Guadalupe Calderón-Leyva, Viridiana Contreras-Villarreal, J. M. Guillen-Muñoz, Oscar Ángel-García","doi":"10.21929/abavet2021.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective was to compare the quality of cryopreserved goat semen with soy lecithin or egg yolk. The semen was collected from male goats (n=4), two commercial diluents AndroMed® (1% soy lecithin, SL); Optidyl (20% (v/v) Tris-egg yolk; TY), and a citrate-egg yolk-based diluent (CY) were used in fresh semen (FS) and then cooled from 37 to 4 °C for 2 h (refrigerated semen, RS), afterwards straws were filled with semen and frozen in liquid nitrogen at -196 °C (FS). There were no differences (p>0.05) between diluents in the FS in the mass motility (MM; 4.7±0.26), sperm viability (SV; 74.1±1.66) and individual motility (MI; 62.3±4.0). In the same sense, for the RS there was no difference (p>0.05) between diluents with respect to MM (3.83±0.4) and MI (52.1±6.0), however, the SV varied (p<0.05) according to the diluent, observing the lowest viability in SL vs CY and TY (51.0±13.0 vs 71.3±3.0 and 69.0±3.1). Regarding FS the MM, MI and SV obtained better values (p<0.05) with the diluent TY vs SL and CY (2.4±0.5, 32.5±8.3, 41.3±13.0). The results showed a better cryopreservation of goat semen with the diluent Tris-yolk compared to that of soy lecithin.","PeriodicalId":7052,"journal":{"name":"Abanico Veterinario","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abanico Veterinario","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21929/abavet2021.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective was to compare the quality of cryopreserved goat semen with soy lecithin or egg yolk. The semen was collected from male goats (n=4), two commercial diluents AndroMed® (1% soy lecithin, SL); Optidyl (20% (v/v) Tris-egg yolk; TY), and a citrate-egg yolk-based diluent (CY) were used in fresh semen (FS) and then cooled from 37 to 4 °C for 2 h (refrigerated semen, RS), afterwards straws were filled with semen and frozen in liquid nitrogen at -196 °C (FS). There were no differences (p>0.05) between diluents in the FS in the mass motility (MM; 4.7±0.26), sperm viability (SV; 74.1±1.66) and individual motility (MI; 62.3±4.0). In the same sense, for the RS there was no difference (p>0.05) between diluents with respect to MM (3.83±0.4) and MI (52.1±6.0), however, the SV varied (p<0.05) according to the diluent, observing the lowest viability in SL vs CY and TY (51.0±13.0 vs 71.3±3.0 and 69.0±3.1). Regarding FS the MM, MI and SV obtained better values (p<0.05) with the diluent TY vs SL and CY (2.4±0.5, 32.5±8.3, 41.3±13.0). The results showed a better cryopreservation of goat semen with the diluent Tris-yolk compared to that of soy lecithin.
用大豆卵磷脂或蛋黄冷冻保存的公山羊精液质量的测定
目的是比较冷冻保存的山羊精液与大豆卵磷脂或蛋黄的质量。精液采集自雄性山羊(n=4),两种商业稀释剂AndroMed®(1%大豆卵磷脂,SL);Optidyl(20%(v/v)Tris蛋黄;TY)和柠檬酸蛋黄基稀释剂(CY)用于新鲜精液(FS)中,然后从37℃冷却至4℃2小时(冷冻精液,RS),然后用精液填充吸管并在-196℃的液氮中冷冻(FS)。FS中稀释液在质量运动性(MM;4.7±0.26)、精子活力(SV;74.1±1.66)和个体运动性(MI;62.3±4.0)方面没有差异(p>0.05)。同样,RS中稀释液对MM(3.83±0.4)和MI(52.1±6.0)没有差异(p>0.05),但SV因稀释液而异(p<0.05),SL与CY和TY的存活力最低(51.0±13.0vs71.3±3.0和69.0±3.1)。在FS方面,稀释液TY与SL和CY的MM、MI和SV值更好(p<0.05)(2.4±0.5、32.5±8.3、41.3±13.0)。结果表明,稀释液Tris卵黄对山羊精液的冷冻保存效果优于大豆卵磷脂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abanico Veterinario
Abanico Veterinario VETERINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信