Reading Peterloo as Social Practice: the Lexical Representation of Social Actors in Three London-based Papers

IF 0.1 4区文学 0 POETRY

KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/09524142.2021.1977512

A. Anselmo

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article provides a keyword in context analysis of three editorials published in London-based papers regarding the events of 16 August 1819 in Manchester: one daily paper, The Courier, and two weeklies, Sherwin’s Political Register and The Examiner. It aims to offer lexical evidence of the struggle for the cultural-political appropriation and representation of Peterloo ‘in public consciousness’. To this end, insights from critical discourse analysis, specifically social actor theory, are used, and elements of rhetorical and argumentative analysis are presented.

查看原文本刊更多论文

将彼得罗解读为社会实践：三篇伦敦论文中社会行动者的词汇表征

摘要本文对伦敦报纸上发表的三篇关于1819年8月16日曼彻斯特事件的社论进行了关键词语境分析：一篇日报《信使报》，两篇周刊《舍温政治纪事报》和《审查者报》。它旨在为争夺文化政治挪用和彼得罗“在公众意识中”的代表性提供词汇证据。为此，我们运用了批判性话语分析，特别是社会行动者理论的见解，并提出了修辞和议论文分析的要素。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

KEATS-SHELLEY REVIEW POETRY-

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Keats-Shelley Review has been published by the Keats-Shelley Memorial Association for almost 100 years. It has a unique identity and broad appeal, embracing Romanticism, English Literature and Anglo-Italian relations. A diverse range of items are published within the Review, including notes, prize-winning essays and contemporary poetry of the highest quality, around a core of peer-reviewed academic articles, essays and reviews. The editor, Professor Nicholas Roe, along with the newly established editorial board, seeks to develop the depth and quality of the contributions, whilst retaining the Review’s distinctive and accessible nature.