Laudatio. In Honour of Distinguished Professor Gail Kligman, University of California, Los Angeles, on the Occasion of Being Awarded the Doctor Honoris Causa Title of the Babeș-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca

Q4 Social Sciences
M. Lazăr
{"title":"Laudatio. In Honour of Distinguished Professor Gail Kligman, University of California, Los Angeles, on the Occasion of Being Awarded the Doctor Honoris Causa Title of the Babeș-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca","authors":"M. Lazăr","doi":"10.1515/subbs-2017-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It so happens that I am giving this laudatio towards the end of a semester when I teach a course on the History of Romanian Social Thought, in which I discuss the stages of thinking and the main accomplishments of the most remarkable Romanian sociologists. In the last lectures, I come to speak about the development of sociology in the years after the political changes of 1989 and I necessarily refer to the contributions of the numerous foreign researchers who have produced substantial studies from and about Romania. Their studies are already social documents. Their reports on the state of the Romanian society in the communist period, shared with the wider Romanian public only after 1989, are even more important for having been written under very particular circumstances, when autochthonous research was either repressed or distorted by censorship or self-censorship. These studies are embraced by the Romanian colleagues who salute in them an honest and objective reflection of the country under the communist regime observed by these professional witnesses. These analyses save the honour of the profession, partly lost and then partly regained after 1989, notably due to the essential contribution of these researchers. In a wider perspective, they continue along the lines of the Romanian sociological tradition and its production from even before 1945 – the field research of the Sociological School of Bucharest, of Gh. Em. Marica in Cluj and of others, work that has become today a collection of documents of an era and of the manner in which this era was able to gaze upon itself. All these","PeriodicalId":53506,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/subbs-2017-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It so happens that I am giving this laudatio towards the end of a semester when I teach a course on the History of Romanian Social Thought, in which I discuss the stages of thinking and the main accomplishments of the most remarkable Romanian sociologists. In the last lectures, I come to speak about the development of sociology in the years after the political changes of 1989 and I necessarily refer to the contributions of the numerous foreign researchers who have produced substantial studies from and about Romania. Their studies are already social documents. Their reports on the state of the Romanian society in the communist period, shared with the wider Romanian public only after 1989, are even more important for having been written under very particular circumstances, when autochthonous research was either repressed or distorted by censorship or self-censorship. These studies are embraced by the Romanian colleagues who salute in them an honest and objective reflection of the country under the communist regime observed by these professional witnesses. These analyses save the honour of the profession, partly lost and then partly regained after 1989, notably due to the essential contribution of these researchers. In a wider perspective, they continue along the lines of the Romanian sociological tradition and its production from even before 1945 – the field research of the Sociological School of Bucharest, of Gh. Em. Marica in Cluj and of others, work that has become today a collection of documents of an era and of the manner in which this era was able to gaze upon itself. All these
Lauditio。加州大学洛杉矶分校杰出教授Gail Kligman在被授予贝贝荣誉博士称号之际
碰巧,我在学期末教授罗马尼亚社会思想史课程时给予了这种赞扬,在课程中,我讨论了罗马尼亚最杰出社会学家的思维阶段和主要成就。在最后的讲座中,我谈到了1989年政治变革后几年社会学的发展,我必须提到许多外国研究人员的贡献,他们对罗马尼亚和罗马尼亚进行了大量研究。他们的研究已经是社会文献。他们关于共产主义时期罗马尼亚社会状况的报告,直到1989年后才与广大罗马尼亚公众分享,因为这些报告是在非常特殊的情况下撰写的,当时本地研究要么被审查或自我审查压制或扭曲。这些研究受到了罗马尼亚同事的欢迎,他们在研究中向这些专业目击者观察到的共产主义政权下的国家的诚实和客观反映致敬。这些分析挽救了该行业的荣誉,1989年后,由于这些研究人员的重要贡献,该行业部分失去,部分恢复。从更广泛的角度来看,他们延续了罗马尼亚社会学传统及其1945年之前的成果——布加勒斯特社会学学院、克卢日的马里卡学院和其他人的实地研究,这些工作今天已经成为一个时代的文献集,以及这个时代能够凝视自己的方式。所有这些
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia
Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信