Thrombectomy Use in the United States for Basilar Artery Occlusion in the Era of Neutral Clinical Trials: 2018 to 2020 Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
J. Siegler, Karan Patel, Kamil Taneja, Matthew B. Obusan, M. Koneru, S. Yaghi, F. Al‐Mufti, T. Kass-Hout, Thanh N. Nguyen
{"title":"Thrombectomy Use in the United States for Basilar Artery Occlusion in the Era of Neutral Clinical Trials: 2018 to 2020 Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample","authors":"J. Siegler, Karan Patel, Kamil Taneja, Matthew B. Obusan, M. Koneru, S. Yaghi, F. Al‐Mufti, T. Kass-Hout, Thanh N. Nguyen","doi":"10.1161/svin.123.000945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n In 2019 and 2020, 2 randomized trials of basilar artery occlusion (BAO) thrombectomy reported no improvement in functional outcomes with thrombectomy, despite observational evidence and weak guidelines recommending thrombectomy. The objective of this study was to assess whether neutral clinical trials may have influenced BAO thrombectomy practice.\n \n \n \n The National Inpatient Sample (2018–2020) was queried for US patients with BAO, and comparisons were made between patients admitted in 2020 versus 2018 to 2019 for the primary outcome of thrombectomy. Unadjusted and adjusted multivariable regression was used, accounting for demographic and clinical covariates, with propensity‐score matching to balance clinical and hospital‐level characteristics between years.\n \n \n \n \n Of the 14 945 patients with BAO, 2345 (15.6%) underwent thrombectomy, with no differences in the unadjusted rate of thrombectomy between 2020 and 2018 to 2019 (14.9% versus 16.1%;\n P\n =0.41). Following multivariable adjustment, BAO thrombectomy was independently associated with a private insurance beneficiary (odds ratio [OR] 1.46, 95% CI 1.16–1.85) as compared with Medicare beneficiary; having a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 10–19 (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.39–2.50) or >19 (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.25–2.26) versus <10; but not with year of admission (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60–1.01;\n P\n =0.06). These relationships were preserved in the propensity‐score matching cohort, and admission year lacked association with thrombectomy for BAO (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.73–1.33;\n P\n =0.92).\n \n \n \n \n Following publication of neutral BAO randomized clinical trials in late 2019 and 2020, there was no significant change in thrombectomy rate among US patients with BAO. The latest trials support thrombectomy for select patients with moderate‐to‐severe BAO symptoms, and this appears consistent with the practice of US clinicians before these trials.\n","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.123.000945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2019 and 2020, 2 randomized trials of basilar artery occlusion (BAO) thrombectomy reported no improvement in functional outcomes with thrombectomy, despite observational evidence and weak guidelines recommending thrombectomy. The objective of this study was to assess whether neutral clinical trials may have influenced BAO thrombectomy practice. The National Inpatient Sample (2018–2020) was queried for US patients with BAO, and comparisons were made between patients admitted in 2020 versus 2018 to 2019 for the primary outcome of thrombectomy. Unadjusted and adjusted multivariable regression was used, accounting for demographic and clinical covariates, with propensity‐score matching to balance clinical and hospital‐level characteristics between years. Of the 14 945 patients with BAO, 2345 (15.6%) underwent thrombectomy, with no differences in the unadjusted rate of thrombectomy between 2020 and 2018 to 2019 (14.9% versus 16.1%; P =0.41). Following multivariable adjustment, BAO thrombectomy was independently associated with a private insurance beneficiary (odds ratio [OR] 1.46, 95% CI 1.16–1.85) as compared with Medicare beneficiary; having a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 10–19 (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.39–2.50) or >19 (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.25–2.26) versus <10; but not with year of admission (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60–1.01; P =0.06). These relationships were preserved in the propensity‐score matching cohort, and admission year lacked association with thrombectomy for BAO (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.73–1.33; P =0.92). Following publication of neutral BAO randomized clinical trials in late 2019 and 2020, there was no significant change in thrombectomy rate among US patients with BAO. The latest trials support thrombectomy for select patients with moderate‐to‐severe BAO symptoms, and this appears consistent with the practice of US clinicians before these trials.
中性临床试验时代美国应用血栓切除术治疗基底动脉闭塞:2018年至2020年全国住院患者样本分析
2019年和2020年,2项基底动脉闭塞(BAO)血栓切除术的随机试验报告称,尽管有观察证据和薄弱的指南建议血栓切除术,但血栓切除术后的功能结果没有改善。本研究的目的是评估中性临床试验是否影响BAO血栓切除术的实践。对美国BAO患者的全国住院患者样本(2018-2020)进行了查询,并对2020年与2018-2019年入院的患者进行了血栓切除术主要结果的比较。使用未经调整和调整的多变量回归,考虑人口统计学和临床协变量,倾向评分匹配,以平衡不同年份的临床和医院水平特征。在14945名BAO患者中,2345名(15.6%)接受了血栓切除术,在2020年至2018年至2019年期间,未经调整的血栓切除率没有差异(14.9%对16.1%;P=0.41)。经过多变量调整,与医疗保险受益人相比,BAO血栓切除术与私人保险受益人独立相关(比值比[OR]1.46,95%CI 1.16-1.85);美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表为10-19(OR 1.89,95%CI 1.39-2.50)或>19(OR 1.67,95%CI 1.25-2.26),而<10;但与入院年份无关(OR 0.78,95%CI 0.60–1.01;P=0.06)。这些关系在倾向评分匹配队列中得到了保留,入院年份与BAO血栓切除术缺乏相关性(OR 0.98,95%CI 0.73–1.33;P=0.92)。在2019年末和2020年发表中性BAO随机临床试验后,在美国BAO患者中血栓切除率没有显著变化。最新的试验支持对有中度至重度BAO症状的患者进行血栓切除术,这似乎与这些试验前美国临床医生的做法一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信