Comparison of shear viscosity and normal stress measurements by rotational and on-line slit rheometers with tube model predictions

IF 2.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS
Paulo F. Teixeira, Loic Hilliou, Jose A. Covas, Esmaeil Narimissa, Leslie Poh, Manfred H. Wagner
{"title":"Comparison of shear viscosity and normal stress measurements by rotational and on-line slit rheometers with tube model predictions","authors":"Paulo F. Teixeira,&nbsp;Loic Hilliou,&nbsp;Jose A. Covas,&nbsp;Esmaeil Narimissa,&nbsp;Leslie Poh,&nbsp;Manfred H. Wagner","doi":"10.1007/s00397-022-01374-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\n</h2><div><p>In-extruder measurements of shear viscosity and normal stresses are important as these measurement techniques allow determining the rheological state of the polymer melt at processing conditions up to high shear rates. However, validation of viscosity and normal stress data obtained by in-line slit rheometers at high shear rates is difficult due to a lack of overlap of the in-line data and the off-line measurements by rotational rheometers limited to lower shear rates. Here, shear viscosity and normal stress data measured in-line at large shear rates during extrusion and off-line at low shear rates are compared to predictions of the Doi-Edwards model and the Hierarchical Multi-Mode Molecular Stress Function (HMMSF) model using linear-viscoelastic off-line small amplitude oscillating shear data of two polystyrenes and a low-density polyethylene as input parameters. For polystyrene, the results of this investigation do not only validate the experimental data obtained by rotational as well as slit-die rheometry, but also demonstrate the agreement between experiments and models up to very high shear rates, which were not experimentally accessible earlier. The low-density polyethylene shows a more complex behaviour, which follows the HMMSF model at low shear rates, but approaches the Doi-Edwards model at high shear rates.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":755,"journal":{"name":"Rheologica Acta","volume":"61 11-12","pages":"799 - 809"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00397-022-01374-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheologica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00397-022-01374-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract

In-extruder measurements of shear viscosity and normal stresses are important as these measurement techniques allow determining the rheological state of the polymer melt at processing conditions up to high shear rates. However, validation of viscosity and normal stress data obtained by in-line slit rheometers at high shear rates is difficult due to a lack of overlap of the in-line data and the off-line measurements by rotational rheometers limited to lower shear rates. Here, shear viscosity and normal stress data measured in-line at large shear rates during extrusion and off-line at low shear rates are compared to predictions of the Doi-Edwards model and the Hierarchical Multi-Mode Molecular Stress Function (HMMSF) model using linear-viscoelastic off-line small amplitude oscillating shear data of two polystyrenes and a low-density polyethylene as input parameters. For polystyrene, the results of this investigation do not only validate the experimental data obtained by rotational as well as slit-die rheometry, but also demonstrate the agreement between experiments and models up to very high shear rates, which were not experimentally accessible earlier. The low-density polyethylene shows a more complex behaviour, which follows the HMMSF model at low shear rates, but approaches the Doi-Edwards model at high shear rates.

Abstract Image

用旋转和在线狭缝流变仪测量剪切粘度和法向应力与管模型预测的比较
挤出机剪切粘度和法向应力的测量很重要,因为这些测量技术允许在高剪切速率的加工条件下确定聚合物熔体的流变状态。然而,在高剪切速率下,由于在线数据缺乏重叠,而旋转流变仪的离线测量仅限于较低的剪切速率,因此很难验证由在线狭缝流变仪获得的粘度和法向应力数据。在这里,剪切粘度和法向应力数据在大剪切速率下在线测量,在低剪切速率下离线测量,与Doi-Edwards模型和分层多模式分子应力函数(HMMSF)模型的预测进行比较,该模型使用线性粘弹性离线小振幅振荡剪切数据作为输入参数,两种聚苯乙烯和一种低密度聚乙烯。对于聚苯乙烯,本研究的结果不仅验证了通过旋转和狭缝模流变学获得的实验数据,而且还证明了实验和模型之间的一致性,直到非常高的剪切速率,这在以前的实验中是无法获得的。低密度聚乙烯表现出更复杂的行为,在低剪切速率下遵循HMMSF模型,但在高剪切速率下接近Doi-Edwards模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheologica Acta
Rheologica Acta 物理-力学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
55
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: "Rheologica Acta is the official journal of The European Society of Rheology. The aim of the journal is to advance the science of rheology, by publishing high quality peer reviewed articles, invited reviews and peer reviewed short communications. The Scope of Rheologica Acta includes: - Advances in rheometrical and rheo-physical techniques, rheo-optics, microrheology - Rheology of soft matter systems, including polymer melts and solutions, colloidal dispersions, cement, ceramics, glasses, gels, emulsions, surfactant systems, liquid crystals, biomaterials and food. - Rheology of Solids, chemo-rheology - Electro and magnetorheology - Theory of rheology - Non-Newtonian fluid mechanics, complex fluids in microfluidic devices and flow instabilities - Interfacial rheology Rheologica Acta aims to publish papers which represent a substantial advance in the field, mere data reports or incremental work will not be considered. Priority will be given to papers that are methodological in nature and are beneficial to a wide range of material classes. It should also be noted that the list of topics given above is meant to be representative, not exhaustive. The editors welcome feedback on the journal and suggestions for reviews and comments."
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信