Change management in business organization: A literature review

IF 1.5 Q3 MANAGEMENT

Human systems management Pub Date : 2023-06-16 DOI:10.3233/hsm-230031

Tareq Abu Orabi, Ghaith Abu Alfalayeh, Wael Basheer Abdul Kareem Alhyasat, Ahmad Ababne, R. Alkhawaldah, M. Qteishat

{"title":"Change management in business organization: A literature review","authors":"Tareq Abu Orabi, Ghaith Abu Alfalayeh, Wael Basheer Abdul Kareem Alhyasat, Ahmad Ababne, R. Alkhawaldah, M. Qteishat","doi":"10.3233/hsm-230031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of the paper’s bibliometric analysis and systematic assessment of change management research in administrative and technological studies may open the way for more study in this field. This study may be the first of its type, and its findings will be useful to other academics working in the subject of change management. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this literature study is to identify essential ideas that might influence change management and to lay the groundwork for future research in change management that uses bibliometric analysis. The evaluation determines the most important and frequently used terms connected with change management. METHODS: The method used in this study is a systematic review of change management publications from Web of Science. RESULTS: The most often used terms in change management research, according to the survey, were Leadership, Organizational Change, Organizational Development, Organizational Culture, Performance, Innovation, Framework, Technology, and Transformation. Change management papers were mostly published in the United States, China, Pakistan, Germany, Australia, and Finland. IMPLICATIONS: The study’s findings may be used to generate articles on change management in the market discipline, notably in the domains of business and technology.","PeriodicalId":13113,"journal":{"name":"Human systems management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human systems management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/hsm-230031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of the paper’s bibliometric analysis and systematic assessment of change management research in administrative and technological studies may open the way for more study in this field. This study may be the first of its type, and its findings will be useful to other academics working in the subject of change management. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this literature study is to identify essential ideas that might influence change management and to lay the groundwork for future research in change management that uses bibliometric analysis. The evaluation determines the most important and frequently used terms connected with change management. METHODS: The method used in this study is a systematic review of change management publications from Web of Science. RESULTS: The most often used terms in change management research, according to the survey, were Leadership, Organizational Change, Organizational Development, Organizational Culture, Performance, Innovation, Framework, Technology, and Transformation. Change management papers were mostly published in the United States, China, Pakistan, Germany, Australia, and Finland. IMPLICATIONS: The study’s findings may be used to generate articles on change management in the market discipline, notably in the domains of business and technology.

查看原文本刊更多论文

企业组织中的变革管理：文献综述

背景：本文对行政和技术研究中变革管理研究的文献计量分析和系统评估的有效性可能为该领域的更多研究开辟道路。这项研究可能是此类研究中的第一项，其发现将对从事变革管理学科的其他学者有用。目的：本文献研究的目的是确定可能影响变革管理的基本思想，并为未来使用文献计量分析的变革管理研究奠定基础。评估确定了与变更管理相关的最重要和最常用的术语。方法：本研究采用的方法是对科学网的变革管理出版物进行系统综述。结果：根据调查，变革管理研究中最常用的术语是领导力、组织变革、组织发展、组织文化、绩效、创新、框架、技术和转型。变革管理论文大多发表在美国、中国、巴基斯坦、德国、澳大利亚和芬兰。启示：这项研究的发现可以用来撰写关于市场纪律中的变革管理的文章，尤其是在商业和技术领域。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Human systems management MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

30.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Human Systems Management (HSM) is an interdisciplinary, international, refereed journal, offering applicable, scientific insight into reinventing business, civil-society and government organizations, through the sustainable development of high-technology processes and structures. Adhering to the highest civic, ethical and moral ideals, the journal promotes the emerging anthropocentric-sociocentric paradigm of societal human systems, rather than the pervasively mechanistic and organismic or medieval corporatism views of humankind’s recent past. Intentionality and scope Their management autonomy, capability, culture, mastery, processes, purposefulness, skills, structure and technology often determine which human organizations truly are societal systems, while others are not. HSM seeks to help transform human organizations into true societal systems, free of bureaucratic ills, along two essential, inseparable, yet complementary aspects of modern management: a) the management of societal human systems: the mastery, science and technology of management, including self management, striving for strategic, business and functional effectiveness, efficiency and productivity, through high quality and high technology, i.e., the capabilities and competences that only truly societal human systems create and use, and b) the societal human systems management: the enabling of human beings to form creative teams, communities and societies through autonomy, mastery and purposefulness, on both a personal and a collegial level, while catalyzing people’s creative, inventive and innovative potential, as people participate in corporate-, business- and functional-level decisions. Appreciably large is the gulf between the innovative ideas that world-class societal human systems create and use, and what some conventional business journals offer. The latter often pertain to already refuted practices, while outmoded business-school curricula reinforce this problematic situation.