Where does the Coronavirus come from? On the mechanisms underlying the endorsement of conspiracy theories on the origin of SARS-CoV-2

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
C. Vezzoni, G. M. Dotti Sani, A. Chiesi, Riccardo Ladini, Ferruccio Biolcati, S. Guglielmi, N. Maggini, M. Maraffi, F. Molteni, A. Pedrazzani, P. Segatti
{"title":"Where does the Coronavirus come from? On the mechanisms underlying the endorsement of conspiracy theories on the origin of SARS-CoV-2","authors":"C. Vezzoni, G. M. Dotti Sani, A. Chiesi, Riccardo Ladini, Ferruccio Biolcati, S. Guglielmi, N. Maggini, M. Maraffi, F. Molteni, A. Pedrazzani, P. Segatti","doi":"10.1017/ipo.2021.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While official science has given its answer to the question on the origin of the Coronavirus (animal to human transmission), alternative theories on human creation of the virus – purposely or inadvertently – have flourished. Those alternative theories can be easily located among the family of conspiracy theories, as they always assume some secretive activity of some groups acting on their self-interest and against the good of the many. The article assesses the prevalence of these beliefs during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy, studies its development during the pandemic, and investigates its potential determinants. In particular, it analyses the relationship between beliefs in alternative theories on the origin of the virus and political orientation, by arguing that the association cannot be attributed to (politically) motivated reasoning, as the issue has not been highly politicized in the Italian context. Alternatively, the article suggests that the main factor driving beliefs in alternative accounts on the origins of the virus is institutional trust. Political orientation moderates its effects, depending on specific conditions (e.g. cue taking, position of the supported party either in government or opposition), and eventually reinforcing scepticism towards epistemic authorities for those with low trust in institutions. Data come from the ResPOnsE COVID-19 survey, carried out with daily samples from April to July 2020 (N > 15.000) to monitor the development of the Italian public opinion during the Coronavirus pandemic.","PeriodicalId":43368,"journal":{"name":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","volume":"52 1","pages":"51 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/ipo.2021.19","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2021.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Abstract While official science has given its answer to the question on the origin of the Coronavirus (animal to human transmission), alternative theories on human creation of the virus – purposely or inadvertently – have flourished. Those alternative theories can be easily located among the family of conspiracy theories, as they always assume some secretive activity of some groups acting on their self-interest and against the good of the many. The article assesses the prevalence of these beliefs during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy, studies its development during the pandemic, and investigates its potential determinants. In particular, it analyses the relationship between beliefs in alternative theories on the origin of the virus and political orientation, by arguing that the association cannot be attributed to (politically) motivated reasoning, as the issue has not been highly politicized in the Italian context. Alternatively, the article suggests that the main factor driving beliefs in alternative accounts on the origins of the virus is institutional trust. Political orientation moderates its effects, depending on specific conditions (e.g. cue taking, position of the supported party either in government or opposition), and eventually reinforcing scepticism towards epistemic authorities for those with low trust in institutions. Data come from the ResPOnsE COVID-19 survey, carried out with daily samples from April to July 2020 (N > 15.000) to monitor the development of the Italian public opinion during the Coronavirus pandemic.
冠状病毒从何而来?关于支持关于SARS-CoV-2起源的阴谋论的机制
虽然官方科学已经给出了冠状病毒起源(动物向人类传播)的答案,但关于人类有意或无意制造病毒的其他理论却蓬勃发展。这些另类理论很容易被归类于阴谋论家族,因为它们总是假设一些团体为了自己的利益而进行一些秘密活动,违背了大多数人的利益。本文评估了这些信念在意大利COVID-19大流行期间的流行程度,研究了其在大流行期间的发展,并调查了其潜在的决定因素。特别是,它分析了对病毒起源的其他理论的信仰与政治倾向之间的关系,认为这种联系不能归因于(政治)动机推理,因为这个问题在意大利的情况下没有高度政治化。另外,这篇文章表明,促使人们相信关于病毒起源的其他说法的主要因素是机构信任。政治倾向会根据具体情况(例如,接受暗示、支持的政党在政府或反对党中的地位)缓和其影响,并最终加强对机构信任度较低的人对认知权威的怀疑。数据来自2019冠状病毒病应对调查,该调查从2020年4月至7月(1.5万欧元)每天抽样进行,以监测冠状病毒大流行期间意大利公众舆论的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信