Near-Stall Modelling of a Pitching Airfoil at High Incidence, Mach Number and Reduced Frequency

IF 1.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
C. Brandstetter, Sina Stapelfeldt
{"title":"Near-Stall Modelling of a Pitching Airfoil at High Incidence, Mach Number and Reduced Frequency","authors":"C. Brandstetter, Sina Stapelfeldt","doi":"10.3390/ijtpp7040026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prediction accuracy of aeroelastic stability in fans and compressors depends crucially on the accuracy of the underlying aerodynamic predictions. The prevalent approach in the field solves the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier—Stokes equations in the presence of blade vibration. Given the unsteady, three-dimensional and often separated nature of the flow in the regimes of aeroelastic interest, the confidence in URANS methods is questionable. This paper uses the simple test case of a pitching symmetric aerofoil with a sharp leading edge to illustrate the challenges of aeroelastic modelling. It compares coupled numerical simulations against time-resolved experimental measurements. The unsteady aerodynamic response of the pitching blade and its dependency on tip-clearance flow and time-averaged incidence angle are analyzed. The results indicate that differences in the unsteady aerodynamics between different numerical approaches close to stall can have a significant impact on local aerodynamic damping. Furthermore, for the chosen test case there is a strong correspondence between the local quasi-steady and unsteady behaviour which weakens, but is still present, towards stall.","PeriodicalId":36626,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtpp7040026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prediction accuracy of aeroelastic stability in fans and compressors depends crucially on the accuracy of the underlying aerodynamic predictions. The prevalent approach in the field solves the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier—Stokes equations in the presence of blade vibration. Given the unsteady, three-dimensional and often separated nature of the flow in the regimes of aeroelastic interest, the confidence in URANS methods is questionable. This paper uses the simple test case of a pitching symmetric aerofoil with a sharp leading edge to illustrate the challenges of aeroelastic modelling. It compares coupled numerical simulations against time-resolved experimental measurements. The unsteady aerodynamic response of the pitching blade and its dependency on tip-clearance flow and time-averaged incidence angle are analyzed. The results indicate that differences in the unsteady aerodynamics between different numerical approaches close to stall can have a significant impact on local aerodynamic damping. Furthermore, for the chosen test case there is a strong correspondence between the local quasi-steady and unsteady behaviour which weakens, but is still present, towards stall.
俯仰翼型在高入射、马赫数和降低频率下的近失速建模
风机和压气机气动弹性稳定性的预测精度在很大程度上取决于基础气动预测的准确性。目前常用的方法是求解存在叶片振动的非定常reynolds -average Navier-Stokes方程。考虑到非定常的、三维的和经常分离的流动性质,在气动弹性的兴趣区,对URANS方法的信心是值得怀疑的。本文以一个具有尖锐前缘的俯仰对称翼型的简单试验案例来说明气动弹性建模的挑战。它比较了耦合数值模拟与时间分辨实验测量。分析了俯仰叶片的非定常气动响应及其与叶尖间隙流和时间平均入射角的关系。结果表明,接近失速时不同数值方法的非定常气动特性差异会对局部气动阻尼产生显著影响。此外,对于所选的测试用例,在局部准稳态和非稳态行为之间存在很强的对应关系,这种对应关系减弱,但仍然存在,趋于失速。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
21.40%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信