Awareness and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines and associated factors among pharmacy students in Zambia.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Steward Mudenda, Moses Mukosha, Christabel Nang'andu Hikaambo, Johanna Catharina Meyer, Joseph Fadare, Martin Kampamba, Aubrey Chichonyi Kalungia, Sody Munsaka, Roland Nnaemeka Okoro, Victor Daka, Misheck Chileshe, Ruth Lindizyani Mfune, Webrod Mufwambi, Bwalya Angel Witika, Brian Godman
{"title":"Awareness and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines and associated factors among pharmacy students in Zambia.","authors":"Steward Mudenda, Moses Mukosha, Christabel Nang'andu Hikaambo, Johanna Catharina Meyer, Joseph Fadare, Martin Kampamba, Aubrey Chichonyi Kalungia, Sody Munsaka, Roland Nnaemeka Okoro, Victor Daka, Misheck Chileshe, Ruth Lindizyani Mfune, Webrod Mufwambi, Bwalya Angel Witika, Brian Godman","doi":"10.4314/mmj.v34i4.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the awareness and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines and associated factors among pharmacy students in Zambia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study among 326 undergraduate pharmacy students in Lusaka, Zambia, from February to April 2021. Data were analysed using Stata version 16.1. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine key factors influencing vaccine acceptance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 326 participants, 98.8% were aware of the COVID-19 vaccines, but only 24.5% would accept vaccination. Compared to other religions, being of Christian faith was associated with reduced odds of awareness of the COVID-19 vaccine (aOR=0.01, 95% CI: 0.01-0.20). Conversely, factors associated with vaccine acceptance were being male, single and unemployed. Compared to females, male respondents were 86% more likely to accept the vaccine if it was made available (aOR=1.86, 95% CI: 1.10-3.14). In addition, unmarried respondents were 2.65 times as likely to accept vaccination than married respondents (aOR=2.65, 95% CI: 1.06-6.63). Conversely, unemployed respondents were less likely to accept vaccination than their employed counterparts (aOR=0.32, 95% CI: 0.16-0.46). Barriers to the acceptability of the vaccine were possible side effects (78.5%) and scepticism about its effectiveness (10.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was significant vaccine hesitancy toward COVID-19 vaccines among Zambian pharmacy students despite their awareness of the vaccines. Health authorities must work collaboratively with training institutions to mitigate vaccine hesitancy, especially with healthcare students being a key part of the future healthcare workforce overseeing disease prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":18185,"journal":{"name":"Malawi Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10645825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malawi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v34i4.8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to assess the awareness and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines and associated factors among pharmacy students in Zambia.

Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among 326 undergraduate pharmacy students in Lusaka, Zambia, from February to April 2021. Data were analysed using Stata version 16.1. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine key factors influencing vaccine acceptance.

Results: Of the 326 participants, 98.8% were aware of the COVID-19 vaccines, but only 24.5% would accept vaccination. Compared to other religions, being of Christian faith was associated with reduced odds of awareness of the COVID-19 vaccine (aOR=0.01, 95% CI: 0.01-0.20). Conversely, factors associated with vaccine acceptance were being male, single and unemployed. Compared to females, male respondents were 86% more likely to accept the vaccine if it was made available (aOR=1.86, 95% CI: 1.10-3.14). In addition, unmarried respondents were 2.65 times as likely to accept vaccination than married respondents (aOR=2.65, 95% CI: 1.06-6.63). Conversely, unemployed respondents were less likely to accept vaccination than their employed counterparts (aOR=0.32, 95% CI: 0.16-0.46). Barriers to the acceptability of the vaccine were possible side effects (78.5%) and scepticism about its effectiveness (10.2%).

Conclusion: There was significant vaccine hesitancy toward COVID-19 vaccines among Zambian pharmacy students despite their awareness of the vaccines. Health authorities must work collaboratively with training institutions to mitigate vaccine hesitancy, especially with healthcare students being a key part of the future healthcare workforce overseeing disease prevention strategies.

赞比亚药学专业学生对COVID-19疫苗的认识和接受程度及其相关因素
目的本研究旨在评估赞比亚药学学生对新冠肺炎疫苗的认识和接受程度以及相关因素。材料和方法2021年2月至4月,我们在赞比亚卢萨卡的326名药学本科生中进行了一项横断面研究。使用Stata 16.1版对数据进行了分析。采用多变量逻辑回归法确定影响疫苗接受度的关键因素。结果在326名参与者中,98.8%的人知道新冠肺炎疫苗,但只有24.5%的人会接受疫苗接种。与其他宗教相比,信奉基督教与对新冠肺炎疫苗的认识率降低有关(aOR=0.01,95%CI:0.0.01-0.20)。相反,与接受疫苗有关的因素是男性、单身和失业。与女性相比,男性受访者接受疫苗的可能性比女性高86%(aOR=1.86,95%CI:1.10-3.14)。此外,未婚受访者接受疫苗接种的可能性是已婚受访者的2.65倍(aOR=2.65,95%CI:1.06-6.63)。相反,失业的受访者比在职的受访者更不可能接受疫苗接种(aOR=0.32,95%CI:0.16-0.46)。疫苗可接受性的障碍是可能的副作用(78.5%)和对其有效性的怀疑(10.2%)。卫生当局必须与培训机构合作,缓解对疫苗的犹豫,尤其是在医疗保健学生是未来监督疾病预防策略的医疗保健工作人员的关键组成部分的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Malawi Medical Journal
Malawi Medical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Driven and guided by the priorities articulated in the Malawi National Health Research Agenda, the Malawi Medical Journal publishes original research, short reports, case reports, viewpoints, insightful editorials and commentaries that are of high quality, informative and applicable to the Malawian and sub-Saharan Africa regions. Our particular interest is to publish evidence-based research that impacts and informs national health policies and medical practice in Malawi and the broader region. Topics covered in the journal include, but are not limited to: - Communicable diseases (HIV and AIDS, Malaria, TB, etc.) - Non-communicable diseases (Cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, etc.) - Sexual and Reproductive Health (Adolescent health, education, pregnancy and abortion, STDs and HIV and AIDS, etc.) - Mental health - Environmental health - Nutrition - Health systems and health policy (Leadership, ethics, and governance) - Community systems strengthening research - Injury, trauma, and surgical disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信