DOES MIDDLE INCOME TRAP EXIST?: EVIDENCE FROM EMERGING ECONOMIES: E7 COUNTRIES FOR 1969-2015

IF 0.3 Q4 ECONOMICS
Burcu Yavuz Tiftikçigil, Burak Güriş, Yaşar Serhat Yaşgül
{"title":"DOES MIDDLE INCOME TRAP EXIST?: EVIDENCE FROM EMERGING ECONOMIES: E7 COUNTRIES FOR 1969-2015","authors":"Burcu Yavuz Tiftikçigil, Burak Güriş, Yaşar Serhat Yaşgül","doi":"10.15304/RGE.27.1.5234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The E7 countries (China, India, Brazil, Russia, Mexico, Indonesia and Turkey)that have been growing fast since 1990s have been under the middle income countrycategory according to the income category classification of the World Bank for a longperiod of time. Researchers have been interested especially in emerging economies thathave not been able to move up from the middle income category to the high incomecategory and this has led to the initiation of what’s called the ‘middle income trap’ (MIT)discussions in literature. The MIT is generally defined as the countries under the middleincome category failing to move up to the high income category. Therefore, the purpose ofthis study is to identify the presence of MIT in E7 countries that hold an importantposition in global economy. The unit root tests were used in the empirical phase of thestudy. This study’s difference from other studies is the fact that both the time series andthe panel data unit root tests were used both in linear and nonlinear forms, thuspreventing the misleading results created by choosing the wrong model specification.The USA was taken as the reference country in the study and the GNI per capitaaccording to the Atlas method (current US$) data of the World Bank was used for the E7countries for the period 1969-2015. To achieve consistency in the analysis results, Russiawas not included in the model as there were no data available for the same period forRussia given the fact that the same timeframe should be taken as the basis for allcountries. The empirical analysis showed that the E7 countries do not fall into the MIT.","PeriodicalId":35769,"journal":{"name":"Revista Galega de Economia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Galega de Economia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15304/RGE.27.1.5234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The E7 countries (China, India, Brazil, Russia, Mexico, Indonesia and Turkey)that have been growing fast since 1990s have been under the middle income countrycategory according to the income category classification of the World Bank for a longperiod of time. Researchers have been interested especially in emerging economies thathave not been able to move up from the middle income category to the high incomecategory and this has led to the initiation of what’s called the ‘middle income trap’ (MIT)discussions in literature. The MIT is generally defined as the countries under the middleincome category failing to move up to the high income category. Therefore, the purpose ofthis study is to identify the presence of MIT in E7 countries that hold an importantposition in global economy. The unit root tests were used in the empirical phase of thestudy. This study’s difference from other studies is the fact that both the time series andthe panel data unit root tests were used both in linear and nonlinear forms, thuspreventing the misleading results created by choosing the wrong model specification.The USA was taken as the reference country in the study and the GNI per capitaaccording to the Atlas method (current US$) data of the World Bank was used for the E7countries for the period 1969-2015. To achieve consistency in the analysis results, Russiawas not included in the model as there were no data available for the same period forRussia given the fact that the same timeframe should be taken as the basis for allcountries. The empirical analysis showed that the E7 countries do not fall into the MIT.
中等收入陷阱存在吗?来自新兴经济体的证据:1969-2015年的e7个国家
根据世界银行的收入类别分类,自20世纪90年代以来增长迅速的E7国家(中国、印度、巴西、俄罗斯、墨西哥、印度尼西亚和土耳其)长期处于中等收入国家类别之下。研究人员尤其对那些未能从中等收入类别上升到高收入类别的新兴经济体感兴趣,这导致了文献中所谓的“中等收入陷阱”(MIT)的讨论。麻省理工学院通常被定义为中等收入类别下未能晋升为高收入类别的国家。因此,本研究的目的是确定麻省理工学院在全球经济中占有重要地位的E7国家的存在。单位根检验用于本研究的经验阶段。本研究与其他研究的不同之处在于,时间序列和面板数据单位根检验都以线性和非线性形式使用,从而避免了由于选择错误的模型规范而产生的误导性结果。本研究以美国为参考国家,根据世界银行阿特拉斯法(当前美元)数据,E7国家在1969-2015年期间使用了人均国民总收入。为了实现分析结果的一致性,俄罗斯不包括在模型中,因为没有俄罗斯同期的数据,因为所有国家都应该以相同的时间段为基础。实证分析表明,E7国家不属于麻省理工学院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Galega de Economia
Revista Galega de Economia Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Galega de Economía es una plataforma editorial para la publicación de artículos de investigación sobre cualquiera de las especialidades del campo de la Economía y de la Administración y Dirección de Empresas. Los trabajos deberán ser originales, inéditos y no estar sometidos a consideración para su publicación en ninguna otra plataforma editorial. El autor o autores de los textos publicados en la Revista Galega de Economía le ceden a ésta los derechos de reproducción.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信