Je Eulerova explanácia nemožnosti prechodu kráľoveckých mostov symetrická alebo asymetrická?

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Dalibor Makovník
{"title":"Je Eulerova explanácia nemožnosti prechodu kráľoveckých mostov symetrická alebo asymetrická?","authors":"Dalibor Makovník","doi":"10.31577/filozofia.2022.77.7.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is Euler’s Explanation of the Non-traversability of Königs-berg’s Bridges Symmetric or Asymmetric? 77, 2022, No 7, pp. 531 – 544 In this article I will focus on the analysis of a scientific explanation of an empi-rical event that has at least three different incompatible interpretations / recon-structions. This example in philosophical and scientific literature is known as Euler's explanation. However, this work will only follow the differences be-tween Reutlinger’s and Lange’s and Woodwardʼs reconstruction. The paper at-tempts to show that Euler’s explanation can only by reconstructed as an asym-metric non-causal explanation. It does so with the help of Lange’s and Wood-ward’s main key ideas of their theories of explanation. Subsequently these ideas are put up against Reutlinger’s conclusion that Euler’s explanation constitutes a symmetric non-causal explanation. In the end the paper argues that ultimately this is a wrong conclusion because Reutlinger’s account omitted certain aspects of Euler’s explanation.","PeriodicalId":44340,"journal":{"name":"FILOZOFIA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FILOZOFIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2022.77.7.4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Is Euler’s Explanation of the Non-traversability of Königs-berg’s Bridges Symmetric or Asymmetric? 77, 2022, No 7, pp. 531 – 544 In this article I will focus on the analysis of a scientific explanation of an empi-rical event that has at least three different incompatible interpretations / recon-structions. This example in philosophical and scientific literature is known as Euler's explanation. However, this work will only follow the differences be-tween Reutlinger’s and Lange’s and Woodwardʼs reconstruction. The paper at-tempts to show that Euler’s explanation can only by reconstructed as an asym-metric non-causal explanation. It does so with the help of Lange’s and Wood-ward’s main key ideas of their theories of explanation. Subsequently these ideas are put up against Reutlinger’s conclusion that Euler’s explanation constitutes a symmetric non-causal explanation. In the end the paper argues that ultimately this is a wrong conclusion because Reutlinger’s account omitted certain aspects of Euler’s explanation.
欧拉对不可能穿越皇家桥梁的解释是对称的还是不对称的?
欧拉对Königs-berg桥不可穿越性的解释是对称的还是不对称的?在本文中,我将重点分析对至少有三种不同的不相容解释/重建的经验事件的科学解释。这个例子在哲学和科学文献中被称为欧拉解释。然而,本工作将只遵循Reutlinger和Lange以及Woodward的重建之间的差异。本文试图证明欧拉解释只能被重构为非对称的非因果解释。它是在兰格和伍德沃德的解释理论的主要思想的帮助下做到这一点的。随后,这些观点被用来反对罗伊特林格的结论,即欧拉的解释构成了对称的非因果解释。最后,本文认为这最终是一个错误的结论,因为罗伊特林格的叙述忽略了欧拉解释的某些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FILOZOFIA
FILOZOFIA PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
66.70%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Filozofia publishes original articles in a wide range of areas including metaphysics, epistemology, history of philosophy, social and political philosophy, philosophy of mind, ethics, philosophy of religion and related disciplines. The journal is published monthly, with the exception of July and August, i.e. ten issues yearly. The articles are accepted in Slovak, Czech and English languages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信