Evaluating Post-Injury Functional Status among Patients Presenting for Emergency Care in Kigali, Rwanda

Enyonam Odoom, S. Garbern, O. Tang, C. G. Marques, Aly Beeman, D. Uwamahoro, Andrew H. Stephen, Chantal Uwamahoro, A. Aluisio
{"title":"Evaluating Post-Injury Functional Status among Patients Presenting for Emergency Care in Kigali, Rwanda","authors":"Enyonam Odoom, S. Garbern, O. Tang, C. G. Marques, Aly Beeman, D. Uwamahoro, Andrew H. Stephen, Chantal Uwamahoro, A. Aluisio","doi":"10.3390/traumacare2030036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite high injury-related morbidity, approaches for evaluating post-injury functional status after emergency care are poorly characterized in resource-limited settings. This study evaluated the feasibility of standardized disability assessments among patients presenting with significant trauma to the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali ED in Rwanda from January–June 2020. The functional status at 28-days post-injury was assessed using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2), the Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale, and self-reported functional state. The primary outcome was a descriptive profile of the disability status at 28-days post-injury. The WHODAS 2.0, Katz ADL Scale and patients’ self-perceived functional status was compared using Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient. Twenty-four patients were included. The most common injury mechanism was road traffic accident (70.8%); 58.3% of patients had traumatic brain injury. The self-perception questionnaire and the Katz ADL scale were strongly correlated with the WHODAS 2.0 scale; however, self-perception was not well correlated with the ADL scale. Post-injury morbidity was high and morbidity assessment was feasible, with a strong correlation between patients’ self-perceived functional status and the WHODAS-2 scale. Structured post-injury assessments may serve to inform the development of rehabilitation services in Rwanda, although larger studies are needed to inform such initiatives.","PeriodicalId":75251,"journal":{"name":"Trauma care (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma care (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/traumacare2030036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite high injury-related morbidity, approaches for evaluating post-injury functional status after emergency care are poorly characterized in resource-limited settings. This study evaluated the feasibility of standardized disability assessments among patients presenting with significant trauma to the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Kigali ED in Rwanda from January–June 2020. The functional status at 28-days post-injury was assessed using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2), the Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale, and self-reported functional state. The primary outcome was a descriptive profile of the disability status at 28-days post-injury. The WHODAS 2.0, Katz ADL Scale and patients’ self-perceived functional status was compared using Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient. Twenty-four patients were included. The most common injury mechanism was road traffic accident (70.8%); 58.3% of patients had traumatic brain injury. The self-perception questionnaire and the Katz ADL scale were strongly correlated with the WHODAS 2.0 scale; however, self-perception was not well correlated with the ADL scale. Post-injury morbidity was high and morbidity assessment was feasible, with a strong correlation between patients’ self-perceived functional status and the WHODAS-2 scale. Structured post-injury assessments may serve to inform the development of rehabilitation services in Rwanda, although larger studies are needed to inform such initiatives.
卢旺达基加利急诊患者损伤后功能状态评估
尽管与损伤相关的发病率很高,但在资源有限的环境中,评估急救后损伤后功能状态的方法很少。这项研究评估了2020年1-6月在卢旺达基加利大学急诊中心接受严重创伤的患者进行标准化残疾评估的可行性。使用世界卫生组织残疾评估表2.0(WHODAS-2)、Katz日常生活活动量表(ADL)和自我报告的功能状态来评估受伤后28天的功能状态。主要结果是对受伤后28天的残疾状况进行描述。使用Kendall秩相关系数比较WHODAS2.0、Katz ADL量表和患者的自我感知功能状态。包括24名患者。最常见的伤害机制是道路交通事故(70.8%);58.3%的患者有创伤性脑损伤。自我感知问卷和Katz ADL量表与WHODAS 2.0量表呈强相关;然而,自我感觉与ADL量表的相关性并不好。损伤后发病率高,发病率评估是可行的,患者的自我感知功能状态与WHODAS-2量表之间有很强的相关性。结构化的受伤后评估可能有助于为卢旺达康复服务的发展提供信息,尽管需要进行更大规模的研究来为这些举措提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信