Benchmarking blood sugar control in the small rural intensive care unit

A. McCague, J. Bautista
{"title":"Benchmarking blood sugar control in the small rural intensive care unit","authors":"A. McCague, J. Bautista","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2019.1677408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: We sought to determine a benchmark for our blood glucose monitoring and compare our data to published data. Methods: Natividad Medical Center is a 172-bed rural hospital located in Salinas, California. Point of care blood glucose (POC-BG) data was extracted from our EMR for all ICU patients greater than 18 years of age between January 2014 and May 2018. Patient day-weighted mean POC-BGs were calculated for each patient by calculating the average POC-BG per day for each patient. Proportion measurements for each of our measurements groups were recorded (>180 mg/dL, <70 mg/dL, >250 mg/dL and <50 mg/dL). Monthly averages were plotted for visual comparison. Benchmarks were calculated by using 2x Standard Deviation for each measurement group. Results: A total of 3164 patients were found with 21,006 POC-BG measurements. The average POC-BG was 136 mg/dL and median 119 mg/dL. Proportion measurements of monthly day-weighted mean POC-BGs ranged from 0–1.2%, 5.3–44.8%, 0–0.3% and 0.6–16.5%, respectively for less than 70 mg/dL, greater than 180 mg/dL, less than 50 mg/dL and greater than 250 mg/dL. A 2x Standard Deviation was used to calculate our benchmark cut offs which provides a 95% confidence interval and includes 97.5% when neglecting the lower range. Our calculated benchmark values are 1.2, 38.2, 0.19, and 13.1% respectively for measurement groups less than 70 mg/dL, greater than 180 mg/dL, less than 50 mg/dL and greater than 250 mg/dL. Conclusion: Here we present data from a small rural hospital in the Western United States. We calculated benchmarks that could be used to track our ongoing hyper/hypoglycemia improvement projects. We found that when compared to published data, our hyper/hypoglycemia data was comparable to national data.","PeriodicalId":75913,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice","volume":"47 1","pages":"177 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21548331.2019.1677408","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2019.1677408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: We sought to determine a benchmark for our blood glucose monitoring and compare our data to published data. Methods: Natividad Medical Center is a 172-bed rural hospital located in Salinas, California. Point of care blood glucose (POC-BG) data was extracted from our EMR for all ICU patients greater than 18 years of age between January 2014 and May 2018. Patient day-weighted mean POC-BGs were calculated for each patient by calculating the average POC-BG per day for each patient. Proportion measurements for each of our measurements groups were recorded (>180 mg/dL, <70 mg/dL, >250 mg/dL and <50 mg/dL). Monthly averages were plotted for visual comparison. Benchmarks were calculated by using 2x Standard Deviation for each measurement group. Results: A total of 3164 patients were found with 21,006 POC-BG measurements. The average POC-BG was 136 mg/dL and median 119 mg/dL. Proportion measurements of monthly day-weighted mean POC-BGs ranged from 0–1.2%, 5.3–44.8%, 0–0.3% and 0.6–16.5%, respectively for less than 70 mg/dL, greater than 180 mg/dL, less than 50 mg/dL and greater than 250 mg/dL. A 2x Standard Deviation was used to calculate our benchmark cut offs which provides a 95% confidence interval and includes 97.5% when neglecting the lower range. Our calculated benchmark values are 1.2, 38.2, 0.19, and 13.1% respectively for measurement groups less than 70 mg/dL, greater than 180 mg/dL, less than 50 mg/dL and greater than 250 mg/dL. Conclusion: Here we present data from a small rural hospital in the Western United States. We calculated benchmarks that could be used to track our ongoing hyper/hypoglycemia improvement projects. We found that when compared to published data, our hyper/hypoglycemia data was comparable to national data.
小型农村重症监护室血糖控制基准
摘要目的:我们试图确定血糖监测的基准,并将我们的数据与已公布的数据进行比较。方法:Natividad医疗中心是一家拥有172张床位的乡村医院,位于加利福尼亚州萨利纳斯。2014年1月至2018年5月期间,从我们的电子病历中提取了所有18岁以上ICU患者的护理点血糖(POC-BG)数据。通过计算每个患者每天的平均POC-BG来计算每个患者的患者日加权平均POC-BGs。记录了我们每个测量组的比例测量值(>180 mg/dL、250 mg/dL和<50 mg/dL)。绘制月平均值以进行视觉比较。通过使用每个测量组的2倍标准偏差来计算基准。结果:共发现3164名患者的POC-BG测量值为21006。平均POC-BG为136 mg/dL,中位数为119 mg/dL。月日加权平均POC BG的比例测量范围分别为0–1.2%、5.3–44.8%、0–0.3%和0.6–16.5%,适用于小于70 mg/dL、大于180 mg/dL,小于50 mg/dL和大于250 mg/dL。使用2倍标准偏差来计算我们的基准截止值,该截止值提供了95%的置信区间,在忽略较低范围时包括97.5%。对于小于70 mg/dL、大于180 mg/dL,小于50 mg/dL和大于250 mg/dL的测量组,我们计算的基准值分别为1.2、38.2、0.19和13.1%。结论:这里我们提供了美国西部一家小型农村医院的数据。我们计算了可用于跟踪我们正在进行的超/低血糖改善项目的基准。我们发现,与公布的数据相比,我们的高血糖/低血糖数据与全国数据相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信