Societal resilience following terrorism: community and coordination in Christchurch

IF 1.3 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Nur Diyanah Binte Anwar, C. Sumpter
{"title":"Societal resilience following terrorism: community and coordination in Christchurch","authors":"Nur Diyanah Binte Anwar, C. Sumpter","doi":"10.1080/19434472.2020.1800785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The March 2019 assault on two mosques during Friday prayers in Christchurch, New Zealand, shocked a nation unaccustomed to the terrorist violence suffered elsewhere in recent years. The immediate reaction from political leaders and wider society was to stand in close solidarity with the targeted Muslim community, and a broad recovery process soon emerged which provided substantial ongoing support to anyone impacted by the incident. The authors spent two weeks in New Zealand in mid-2019 with the aim of understanding the apparent societal resilience displayed following the attack, and the ways in which the response was coordinated across different levels of government and civil society. It became clear that effective working relationships among national/municipal authorities and community members/associations established well before the tragedy facilitated communications, cooperation, and the appropriate targeting of support. High levels of institutional trust and authentic leadership enabled an organic, personable recovery process, and represents a pertinent example of societal resilience following an act of terrorism.","PeriodicalId":54174,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression","volume":"14 1","pages":"70 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19434472.2020.1800785","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2020.1800785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT The March 2019 assault on two mosques during Friday prayers in Christchurch, New Zealand, shocked a nation unaccustomed to the terrorist violence suffered elsewhere in recent years. The immediate reaction from political leaders and wider society was to stand in close solidarity with the targeted Muslim community, and a broad recovery process soon emerged which provided substantial ongoing support to anyone impacted by the incident. The authors spent two weeks in New Zealand in mid-2019 with the aim of understanding the apparent societal resilience displayed following the attack, and the ways in which the response was coordinated across different levels of government and civil society. It became clear that effective working relationships among national/municipal authorities and community members/associations established well before the tragedy facilitated communications, cooperation, and the appropriate targeting of support. High levels of institutional trust and authentic leadership enabled an organic, personable recovery process, and represents a pertinent example of societal resilience following an act of terrorism.
恐怖主义后的社会复原力:克赖斯特彻奇的社区与协调
摘要2019年3月,新西兰克赖斯特彻奇两座清真寺在周五祈祷时遭到袭击,震惊了一个不习惯近年来在其他地方遭受恐怖暴力的国家。政治领导人和更广泛的社会的直接反应是与目标穆斯林社区紧密团结,很快就出现了一个广泛的恢复进程,为任何受事件影响的人提供了持续的实质性支持。2019年年中,作者在新西兰呆了两周,目的是了解袭击后表现出的明显的社会韧性,以及政府和民间社会不同级别的应对措施的协调方式。很明显,早在悲剧发生之前,国家/市政当局与社区成员/协会之间就建立了有效的工作关系,促进了沟通、合作和适当的支持目标。高度的机构信任和真正的领导促成了一个有机的、有个性的恢复过程,并代表了恐怖主义行为后社会韧性的一个相关例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信