Artificial intelligence and art: Identifying the aesthetic judgment factors that distinguish human- and machine-generated artwork.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Andrew Samo, Scott Highhouse
{"title":"Artificial intelligence and art: Identifying the aesthetic judgment factors that distinguish human- and machine-generated artwork.","authors":"Andrew Samo, Scott Highhouse","doi":"10.1037/aca0000570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artistic creation hastraditionally been thought to be a uniquely human ability. Recent advancements in arti- fi cial intelligence (AI), however, have enabled algorithms to create art that is nearly indistinguishable from human artwork. Existing research suggests that people have a bias against AI artwork but cannot accurately identify it in blind comparisons. The current study extends this investigation to examine the aesthetic judg- ment factors differentiating human and machine art. Results indicate that people are unable to accurately identify artwork source but prefer human art and experience more positive emotions in response to human artwork. The aesthetic judgment factors differentiating human- and machine-generated art were all related to positive emotionality. This fi nding has several implications for this research area and limitation and avenues for future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47873,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000570","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artistic creation hastraditionally been thought to be a uniquely human ability. Recent advancements in arti- fi cial intelligence (AI), however, have enabled algorithms to create art that is nearly indistinguishable from human artwork. Existing research suggests that people have a bias against AI artwork but cannot accurately identify it in blind comparisons. The current study extends this investigation to examine the aesthetic judg- ment factors differentiating human and machine art. Results indicate that people are unable to accurately identify artwork source but prefer human art and experience more positive emotions in response to human artwork. The aesthetic judgment factors differentiating human- and machine-generated art were all related to positive emotionality. This fi nding has several implications for this research area and limitation and avenues for future research are discussed.
人工智能与艺术:识别区分人类和机器生成的艺术品的审美判断因素。
艺术创作历来被认为是人类独有的能力。然而,人工智能(AI)的最新进展使算法能够创造出与人类艺术品几乎无法区分的艺术。现有研究表明,人们对人工智能艺术品有偏见,但无法在盲目比较中准确识别。目前的研究扩展了这项调查,以检验区分人类艺术和机器艺术的审美判断因素。结果表明,人们无法准确识别艺术品来源,而是更喜欢人类艺术,并在对人类艺术的反应中体验到更积极的情绪。区分人和机器生成艺术的审美判断因素都与积极的情感有关。这一发现对该研究领域有几个影响,并讨论了未来研究的局限性和途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信