Critical leisure as an alternative politics of prosperity: a political economy approach to the good life

IF 2.1 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Jeff Rose
{"title":"Critical leisure as an alternative politics of prosperity: a political economy approach to the good life","authors":"Jeff Rose","doi":"10.1080/11745398.2021.1938156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By most accounts in popular press and in academic journals, we are in crisis. Regardless of the geographical scale in question, there are pressing social crises concerning soaring rates of wealth inequality, racial injustices, institutional corruption, educational inequities, displacement of Indigenous peoples, social isolation, and political instability, to name a few examples. Further, by nearly any sober account, we are in the midst of an ecological crisis as well. While climate change is the overarching behemoth that encompasses most of these concerns, there are more specific worries associated with species loss, desertification, overfishing, topsoil despoliation, paradoxical drought and flooding, agricultural monocultures, ocean acidification, and many others. Most assessments are that we have passed a ‘point of no return’ in our warming climate, as we have already exceeded many of the supposed tipping points (polar sea ice loss, melting of Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, tundra methane release, etc.), accelerating a disastrous feedback loop. In short, assessing our social and environmental world often paints a grim picture. What, then, are we to do? The weight of these contemporary social and environmental concerns are so totalizing that they regularly feel overwhelming, if not paralyzing (Robbins and Moore 2013). We see them, we consider them, and often, we move on, hoping that others undertake the significant work to address them. Because, after all, these problems are just too much to take on. This collective feeling of anxiety and inadequacy in the face of insurmountable problems seems to have gripped our contemporary culture (Remes et al. 2016), and an unevenly experienced global pandemic has only worsened this condition (Salari et al. 2020). In this essay, I make the case that a critical political economy approach can address not only the crises at hand, but also these feelings of inadequacy, paralysis, and complacency that all too often accompany the facing of crises. A critical political economy approach places the structure of the economy and sets of power-laden relationships as primary drivers of these socioenvironmental phenomena that mark our crises. I address these pressing, materialist concerns through a critical philosophy of leisure, of all things. I make that case that our neoliberal political economy masks and obfuscates the social and environmental exploitation at the heart of capitalism, a system that has an explicit goal to ‘rob us of our capacity to recognize that we are in crisis’ (Stewart 2021, 263). Understanding leisure, and a recentering and perhaps a reconceptualization of the good life, is one necessary and materialist confrontation that we can and should make.","PeriodicalId":47015,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Leisure Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Leisure Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2021.1938156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

By most accounts in popular press and in academic journals, we are in crisis. Regardless of the geographical scale in question, there are pressing social crises concerning soaring rates of wealth inequality, racial injustices, institutional corruption, educational inequities, displacement of Indigenous peoples, social isolation, and political instability, to name a few examples. Further, by nearly any sober account, we are in the midst of an ecological crisis as well. While climate change is the overarching behemoth that encompasses most of these concerns, there are more specific worries associated with species loss, desertification, overfishing, topsoil despoliation, paradoxical drought and flooding, agricultural monocultures, ocean acidification, and many others. Most assessments are that we have passed a ‘point of no return’ in our warming climate, as we have already exceeded many of the supposed tipping points (polar sea ice loss, melting of Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, tundra methane release, etc.), accelerating a disastrous feedback loop. In short, assessing our social and environmental world often paints a grim picture. What, then, are we to do? The weight of these contemporary social and environmental concerns are so totalizing that they regularly feel overwhelming, if not paralyzing (Robbins and Moore 2013). We see them, we consider them, and often, we move on, hoping that others undertake the significant work to address them. Because, after all, these problems are just too much to take on. This collective feeling of anxiety and inadequacy in the face of insurmountable problems seems to have gripped our contemporary culture (Remes et al. 2016), and an unevenly experienced global pandemic has only worsened this condition (Salari et al. 2020). In this essay, I make the case that a critical political economy approach can address not only the crises at hand, but also these feelings of inadequacy, paralysis, and complacency that all too often accompany the facing of crises. A critical political economy approach places the structure of the economy and sets of power-laden relationships as primary drivers of these socioenvironmental phenomena that mark our crises. I address these pressing, materialist concerns through a critical philosophy of leisure, of all things. I make that case that our neoliberal political economy masks and obfuscates the social and environmental exploitation at the heart of capitalism, a system that has an explicit goal to ‘rob us of our capacity to recognize that we are in crisis’ (Stewart 2021, 263). Understanding leisure, and a recentering and perhaps a reconceptualization of the good life, is one necessary and materialist confrontation that we can and should make.
批判休闲作为繁荣政治的另一种选择:通向美好生活的政治经济学途径
根据大众媒体和学术期刊的大多数报道,我们正处于危机之中。无论地理范围如何,都存在一些紧迫的社会危机,如财富不平等加剧、种族不公正、机构腐败、教育不平等、土著人民流离失所、社会孤立和政治不稳定等。此外,从几乎任何清醒的角度来看,我们也处于一场生态危机之中。虽然气候变化是一个包管一切的庞然大物,包含了大多数这些担忧,但还有更多具体的担忧与物种丧失、荒漠化、过度捕捞、表土掠夺、矛盾的干旱和洪水、农业单一栽培、海洋酸化等有关。大多数评估认为,我们已经越过了气候变暖的“不归路”,因为我们已经超过了许多假定的临界点(极地海冰损失、格陵兰岛和南极冰盖融化、冻土带甲烷释放等),加速了灾难性的反馈循环。简而言之,评估我们的社会和环境世界往往描绘出一幅严峻的画面。那么,我们该怎么办呢?这些当代社会和环境问题的重要性是如此的全面,以至于它们经常让人感到势不可挡,如果不是瘫痪的话(罗宾斯和摩尔,2013)。我们看到它们,我们考虑它们,我们常常继续前进,希望其他人承担重要的工作来解决它们。因为,毕竟,这些问题太多了,无法承担。面对无法克服的问题,这种焦虑和不足的集体感觉似乎已经笼罩了我们的当代文化(Remes et al. 2016),而一场经历不均匀的全球大流行只会加剧这种情况(Salari et al. 2020)。在这篇文章中,我提出了一种批判性的政治经济学方法,它不仅可以解决手头的危机,还可以解决在面对危机时经常出现的不足感、麻痹感和自满感。一种批判性的政治经济学方法将经济结构和一系列充满权力的关系视为这些社会环境现象的主要驱动力,这些现象标志着我们的危机。我通过对闲暇和所有事物的批判哲学来解决这些紧迫的唯物主义问题。我认为,我们的新自由主义政治经济掩盖和模糊了资本主义核心的社会和环境剥削,这个制度的明确目标是“剥夺我们认识到我们处于危机中的能力”(Stewart 2021, 263)。对休闲的理解,以及对美好生活的重新认识,或许是对美好生活的重新概念化,是一种必要的、唯物主义的对抗,我们可以也应该这样做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Leisure Research
Annals of Leisure Research HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信