Outcomes of use of the quality outcome measure for individuals with dementia (QOMID) with people with Down’s syndrome and dementia

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Aoife Ryan, Karen Dodd
{"title":"Outcomes of use of the quality outcome measure for individuals with dementia (QOMID) with people with Down’s syndrome and dementia","authors":"Aoife Ryan, Karen Dodd","doi":"10.1108/amhid-01-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to describe the outcomes of the use of the Quality Outcome Measure for individuals with dementia (QOMID) within a dementia pathway for people with Down’s syndrome (DS). The QOMID is a tool for clinicians to use with 17 outcome domains, each with descriptors for early, mid and late stage dementia, rated on a four point scale from rarely achieved for the person (1) to consistently and completely achieved for the person (4).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData from first time use of the QOMID with 49 people with DS and dementia was analysed to determine if specific outcome domains are more achievable than others, if this differs by stage of dementia and what recommendations are suggested.\n\n\nFindings\nResults suggest that there were significant differences in achievability across the domains but that achievability did not vary between early and mid-stages of dementia. The themes with most recommendations were: quality of paperwork and documentation; improving communication with the person with DS and dementia; and working together with health and social care professionals.\n\n\nPractical implications\nResults suggest that outcomes which fall outside of the typical learning disabilities skillset and are dementia specific are being achieved less often. Primarily, recommendations focused on practical solutions such as using visual timetables to communicate with the person and adapting their environment. Further work on integrating the QOMID and stage-related team training for care staff is underway.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first detailed analysis of the use of the QOMID in clinical practice with people with DS and dementia.\n","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/amhid-01-2023-0002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to describe the outcomes of the use of the Quality Outcome Measure for individuals with dementia (QOMID) within a dementia pathway for people with Down’s syndrome (DS). The QOMID is a tool for clinicians to use with 17 outcome domains, each with descriptors for early, mid and late stage dementia, rated on a four point scale from rarely achieved for the person (1) to consistently and completely achieved for the person (4). Design/methodology/approach Data from first time use of the QOMID with 49 people with DS and dementia was analysed to determine if specific outcome domains are more achievable than others, if this differs by stage of dementia and what recommendations are suggested. Findings Results suggest that there were significant differences in achievability across the domains but that achievability did not vary between early and mid-stages of dementia. The themes with most recommendations were: quality of paperwork and documentation; improving communication with the person with DS and dementia; and working together with health and social care professionals. Practical implications Results suggest that outcomes which fall outside of the typical learning disabilities skillset and are dementia specific are being achieved less often. Primarily, recommendations focused on practical solutions such as using visual timetables to communicate with the person and adapting their environment. Further work on integrating the QOMID and stage-related team training for care staff is underway. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first detailed analysis of the use of the QOMID in clinical practice with people with DS and dementia.
痴呆症患者与唐氏综合征和痴呆症患者使用质量结果测量的结果
目的本文旨在描述在唐氏综合征(DS)患者痴呆途径中使用痴呆个体质量结果测量(QOMID)的结果。QOMID是临床医生使用的工具,有17个结果域,每个结果域都有早期、中期和晚期痴呆的描述符,以4分制评分,从很少实现(1)到持续和完全实现(4)。设计/方法/方法分析了49名DS和痴呆患者首次使用QOMID的数据,以确定特定结果域是否比其他结果域更容易实现。这是否因痴呆的不同阶段而不同,建议是什么。研究结果表明,各个领域的可实现性存在显著差异,但在痴呆症的早期和中期阶段,可实现性没有变化。建议最多的主题是:文书工作和文件的质量;改善与退行性痴呆患者的沟通;并与卫生和社会保健专业人员共同努力。实际意义结果表明,在典型的学习障碍技能之外的结果和痴呆症特有的结果越来越少。首先,建议侧重于实际的解决方案,例如使用可视化时间表与人沟通并适应他们的环境。将QOMID与护理人员阶段相关团队培训结合起来的进一步工作正在进行中。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是首次详细分析QOMID在退行性痴呆和痴呆患者临床实践中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信