The role of ‘big data’ and ‘in silico’ New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in ending animal use – A commentary on progress

IF 3.1 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Rebecca N. Ram , Domenico Gadaleta , Timothy E.H. Allen
{"title":"The role of ‘big data’ and ‘in silico’ New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) in ending animal use – A commentary on progress","authors":"Rebecca N. Ram ,&nbsp;Domenico Gadaleta ,&nbsp;Timothy E.H. Allen","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>In silico</em><span> (computational) methods continue to evolve as part of a robust 21st century public health strategy in risk assessment, relevant to all sectors of chemical safety including preclinical drug discovery, industrial chemicals testing, food and cosmetics. Alongside </span><em>in vitro</em> methods as components of intelligent testing and pathway driven strategies, <em>in silico</em> models provide the potential for more human relevant solutions to the use of animals in safety testing and biomedical research. These are often termed ‘New Approach Methodologies’ (NAMs). Some NAMs incorporate the use of ‘big data’, for example the information provided from high throughput or high content <em>in vitro</em> screening assays or ‘omics’ technologies. Big data has increasing relevance to predictive toxicology but must be appropriately defined, particularly with regard to ‘quality vs quantity’. The purpose of this article is to provide a commentary on the progress of <em>in silico</em> human-based research methods within the context of NAMs, as well as discussion of the emerging use of big data with relevance to safety assessment. The current status of <em>in silico</em> methods is discussed, with input from researchers in the field. Scientific and legislative drivers for change are also considered, along with next steps to address challenges in funding and recognition, to achieve regulatory acceptance and uptake within the research community. To provide some wider context, the use of <em>in silico</em> methods alongside other relevant approaches (e.g., human-based <em>in vitro</em>) is also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111322000202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In silico (computational) methods continue to evolve as part of a robust 21st century public health strategy in risk assessment, relevant to all sectors of chemical safety including preclinical drug discovery, industrial chemicals testing, food and cosmetics. Alongside in vitro methods as components of intelligent testing and pathway driven strategies, in silico models provide the potential for more human relevant solutions to the use of animals in safety testing and biomedical research. These are often termed ‘New Approach Methodologies’ (NAMs). Some NAMs incorporate the use of ‘big data’, for example the information provided from high throughput or high content in vitro screening assays or ‘omics’ technologies. Big data has increasing relevance to predictive toxicology but must be appropriately defined, particularly with regard to ‘quality vs quantity’. The purpose of this article is to provide a commentary on the progress of in silico human-based research methods within the context of NAMs, as well as discussion of the emerging use of big data with relevance to safety assessment. The current status of in silico methods is discussed, with input from researchers in the field. Scientific and legislative drivers for change are also considered, along with next steps to address challenges in funding and recognition, to achieve regulatory acceptance and uptake within the research community. To provide some wider context, the use of in silico methods alongside other relevant approaches (e.g., human-based in vitro) is also discussed.

“大数据”和“计算机”新方法在终止动物使用中的作用——进展评述
计算机(计算)方法作为21世纪强有力的风险评估公共卫生战略的一部分继续发展,涉及化学品安全的所有部门,包括临床前药物发现、工业化学品测试、食品和化妆品。除了体外方法作为智能测试和途径驱动策略的组成部分外,计算机模型为在安全测试和生物医学研究中使用动物提供了更多与人类相关的解决方案的潜力。这些通常被称为“新方法方法”(NAMs)。一些NAMs结合了“大数据”的使用,例如高通量或高含量体外筛选分析或“组学”技术提供的信息。大数据与预测毒理学的相关性越来越大,但必须适当定义,特别是在“质量与数量”方面。本文的目的是对NAMs背景下基于计算机的人类研究方法的进展进行评论,并讨论与安全评估相关的大数据的新兴应用。讨论了计算机方法的现状,并听取了该领域研究人员的意见。还考虑了变革的科学和立法驱动因素,以及解决资助和认可方面的挑战的后续步骤,以实现科研界的监管接受和吸收。为了提供一些更广泛的背景,还讨论了计算机方法与其他相关方法(例如,基于人的体外)的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Toxicology
Computational Toxicology Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Computational Toxicology is an international journal publishing computational approaches that assist in the toxicological evaluation of new and existing chemical substances assisting in their safety assessment. -All effects relating to human health and environmental toxicity and fate -Prediction of toxicity, metabolism, fate and physico-chemical properties -The development of models from read-across, (Q)SARs, PBPK, QIVIVE, Multi-Scale Models -Big Data in toxicology: integration, management, analysis -Implementation of models through AOPs, IATA, TTC -Regulatory acceptance of models: evaluation, verification and validation -From metals, to small organic molecules to nanoparticles -Pharmaceuticals, pesticides, foods, cosmetics, fine chemicals -Bringing together the views of industry, regulators, academia, NGOs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信