The Triumphs’ Golden Age: a comparison between three European translations of Ilicino’s Commentary.

IF 0.2 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Leonardo Francalanci
{"title":"The Triumphs’ Golden Age: a comparison between three European translations of Ilicino’s Commentary.","authors":"Leonardo Francalanci","doi":"10.7203/mclm.7.17565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last part of the fifteenth and the first decades of the sixteenth centuries, the dissemination of Petrarch’s Trionfi – the so-called ‘second wave’ of Petrarchism – was characterized by the extraordinary editorial success, in Italy as well as in the rest of Western Europe, of Bernardo Ilicino’s Commento on the Trionfi. By promoting an erudite, encyclopedic, and moralizing reading of Petrarch’s poem, Ilicino’s commentary effectively became a lens through which generations of European readers approached the text. Nonetheless, the dissemination of the commentary proved not to be immune from the influence of sixteenth-century lyrical Petrarchism, which started developing almost at the same time but would not reach peak until few years later. A comparative study of the three known translations of Ilicino’s Commento in Catalan, French and Spanish – even more so, vis à vis the translation of the poem without the commentary – allows us to identify similarities among these translations, as well as important differences. Some of these differences reveal that while the commentary was still sought after by early sixteenth-century readers of Petrarch’s poem, the general approach towards the poem was already starting to shift in the direction of Petrarchism. The three European translations of Ilicino’s Commentary, when organized chronologically, help shed light on how much the reception of the Triumphs was influenced at the time by the parallel development of European Petrarchism, which promoted a more direct, literary approach towards the poem.","PeriodicalId":40390,"journal":{"name":"Magnificat Cultura i Literatura Medievals","volume":"7 1","pages":"165-185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnificat Cultura i Literatura Medievals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/mclm.7.17565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the last part of the fifteenth and the first decades of the sixteenth centuries, the dissemination of Petrarch’s Trionfi – the so-called ‘second wave’ of Petrarchism – was characterized by the extraordinary editorial success, in Italy as well as in the rest of Western Europe, of Bernardo Ilicino’s Commento on the Trionfi. By promoting an erudite, encyclopedic, and moralizing reading of Petrarch’s poem, Ilicino’s commentary effectively became a lens through which generations of European readers approached the text. Nonetheless, the dissemination of the commentary proved not to be immune from the influence of sixteenth-century lyrical Petrarchism, which started developing almost at the same time but would not reach peak until few years later. A comparative study of the three known translations of Ilicino’s Commento in Catalan, French and Spanish – even more so, vis à vis the translation of the poem without the commentary – allows us to identify similarities among these translations, as well as important differences. Some of these differences reveal that while the commentary was still sought after by early sixteenth-century readers of Petrarch’s poem, the general approach towards the poem was already starting to shift in the direction of Petrarchism. The three European translations of Ilicino’s Commentary, when organized chronologically, help shed light on how much the reception of the Triumphs was influenced at the time by the parallel development of European Petrarchism, which promoted a more direct, literary approach towards the poem.
《胜利者的黄金时代》:伊利奇诺评论的三个欧洲译本之比较。
在十五世纪末和十六世纪头几十年,彼特拉克的《Trionfi》——所谓的彼特拉克主义的“第二波”——的传播以贝尔纳多·伊利奇诺的《Triconfi评论》在意大利和西欧其他地区的非凡编辑成功为特征。通过提倡对彼特拉克诗歌的博学、百科全书式和道德化的阅读,伊利奇诺的评论有效地成为了一代又一代欧洲读者接触文本的镜头。尽管如此,事实证明,评论的传播并不能免受16世纪抒情佩特拉主义的影响,佩特拉主义几乎在同一时间开始发展,但直到几年后才达到顶峰。对伊利奇诺的《评论》的加泰罗尼亚语、法语和西班牙语三种已知翻译进行比较研究——更重要的是,与没有评论的诗歌翻译相比——可以让我们发现这些翻译之间的相似之处以及重要的差异。其中一些差异表明,尽管16世纪初佩特拉克诗歌的读者仍在寻求评论,但对这首诗的总体态度已经开始朝着佩特拉克主义的方向转变。伊利奇诺评论的三个欧洲译本,按时间顺序排列,有助于揭示当时对《胜利》的接受在多大程度上受到了欧洲彼特拉克主义的平行发展的影响,这促进了对这首诗采取更直接的文学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Magnificat Cultura i Literatura Medievals
Magnificat Cultura i Literatura Medievals MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Its coverage is threefold: (1) Cultural subjects for the Romance area, in the medieval and post-medieval era (up to 1600). (2) Literature, linguistics and cultural issues in general, concerning the Crown of Aragon and Occitania (and other related areas such as Naples and Navarre). (3) Digital humanities or otherwise methodological studies, provided that they may be of service to the medievalist. This annual publication has been created with the intention of serving as a platform for works that exceed the conventional length of journal articles. Therefore Magnificat CLM will preferably publish long articles, but articles of medium length are not excluded. Magnificat CLM is aimed at an audience of researchers and specialists in medieval studies, especially Romance philology, as well as of specialists in digital humanities. Magnificat CLM consists of a single section of articles, occasionally including a monographic dossier on particular subjects. All articles are indexed. Magnificat CLM published its first volume in 2014.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信