Listening in to a conversation enhances theory of mind

Emanuele Castano , Alison Jane Martingano , Gabriana Basile , Elly Bergen , Evelyn Hye Kyung Jeong
{"title":"Listening in to a conversation enhances theory of mind","authors":"Emanuele Castano ,&nbsp;Alison Jane Martingano ,&nbsp;Gabriana Basile ,&nbsp;Elly Bergen ,&nbsp;Evelyn Hye Kyung Jeong","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Activities that require mentalizing, such as meditating or reading literary fiction, have been shown to enhance Theory of Mind (ToM) (e.g., Tan, Lo, and Macrae, 2014; Kidd &amp; Castano, 2013). In this article, we conjecture that relatively greater mentalizing effort also occurs when individuals can only listen in on a conversation, compared to those who actively participate in it. Therefore, those who listen in should show better performance on subsequent ToM tasks. Participants (<em>N</em> = 77) were divided into triads and randomly assigned to be Interlocutors (a Director and a Matcher) or Listeners. In each triad, Interlocutors completed a collaborative figure matching task while talking to each other, while Listeners completed the same task while listening to live audio of the Interlocutors' conversation. All participants then completed two Theory of Mind measures. Multivariate analyses show that Listeners outperformed Interlocutors on both measures, but the pattern is significant only for one measure. These results complement existing theorizing and findings regarding the potential benefit of participating in activities that train ToM and may also help explain the often-observed stronger ToM performance of those (e.g., women) who, at least in certain contexts, have typically been discouraged from participating actively in conversations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622723000217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Activities that require mentalizing, such as meditating or reading literary fiction, have been shown to enhance Theory of Mind (ToM) (e.g., Tan, Lo, and Macrae, 2014; Kidd & Castano, 2013). In this article, we conjecture that relatively greater mentalizing effort also occurs when individuals can only listen in on a conversation, compared to those who actively participate in it. Therefore, those who listen in should show better performance on subsequent ToM tasks. Participants (N = 77) were divided into triads and randomly assigned to be Interlocutors (a Director and a Matcher) or Listeners. In each triad, Interlocutors completed a collaborative figure matching task while talking to each other, while Listeners completed the same task while listening to live audio of the Interlocutors' conversation. All participants then completed two Theory of Mind measures. Multivariate analyses show that Listeners outperformed Interlocutors on both measures, but the pattern is significant only for one measure. These results complement existing theorizing and findings regarding the potential benefit of participating in activities that train ToM and may also help explain the often-observed stronger ToM performance of those (e.g., women) who, at least in certain contexts, have typically been discouraged from participating actively in conversations.

Abstract Image

听谈话可以增强心智理论
需要心智化的活动,如冥想或阅读文学小说,已被证明可以增强心智理论(ToM)(例如,Tan, Lo, and Macrae, 2014;基德,Castano, 2013)。在这篇文章中,我们推测,与那些积极参与谈话的人相比,当个人只能倾听谈话时,也会产生相对更大的心理努力。因此,那些听讲的人应该在随后的ToM任务中表现得更好。参与者(N = 77)被分成三人组,随机分配为对话者(指导者和匹配者)或倾听者。在每个三人组中,对话者在彼此交谈的同时完成了一个协作的人物匹配任务,而听众在听对话者对话的实时音频时完成了相同的任务。然后,所有参与者都完成了两项心理理论测试。多变量分析表明,倾听者在这两个方面的表现都优于对话者,但这种模式仅在一个方面是显著的。这些结果补充了现有的理论和发现,关于参加训练ToM的活动的潜在好处,也可能有助于解释经常观察到的那些(例如,女性)的ToM表现更强,至少在某些情况下,通常不鼓励积极参与对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
140 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信