Calibration transfer methodology for cloud radars based on ice cloud observations

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, OCEAN
Susana Jorquera, Felipe Toledo Bittner, J. Delanoë, A. Berne, Anne-Claire Billault-Roux, A. Schwarzenboeck, F. Dezitter, N. Viltard, A. Martini
{"title":"Calibration transfer methodology for cloud radars based on ice cloud observations","authors":"Susana Jorquera, Felipe Toledo Bittner, J. Delanoë, A. Berne, Anne-Claire Billault-Roux, A. Schwarzenboeck, F. Dezitter, N. Viltard, A. Martini","doi":"10.1175/jtech-d-22-0087.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article presents a calibration transfer methodology between radars of the same and different frequency bands. This method enables the absolute calibration of a meteorological radar by transferring it from another co-located instrument with known calibration, by simultaneously measuring vertical cloud reflectivity profiles. The advantage is that the added uncertainty in the newly calibrated instrument can reach the magnitude of the reference instrument calibration. This is achieved by carefully selecting comparable data, including the identification of the reflectivity range that avoids the disparities introduced by differences in sensitivity or scattering regime. The result is a correction coefficient used to compensate measurement bias in the uncalibrated instrument. Calibration transfer uncertainty can be reduced by increasing the number of sampling periods. The methodology was applied between co-located W-band radars deployed during the ICE-GENESIS campaign (Switzerland 2020-2021). A difference of 2.2 dB was found in their reflectivity measurements, with an uncertainty of 0.7 dB. The calibration transfer was also applied to radars of different frequency, an X-band radar with unknown calibration and aW-band radar with manufacturer calibration, the difference found was -16.7 dB with an uncertainty of 1.2 dB. The method was validated through closure, by transferring calibration between three different radars in two different case studies. For the first case, involving three W-band radars, the bias found was of 0.2 dB. In the second case, involving two W-band and one X-band radar, the bias found was of 0.3 dB. These results imply that the biases introduced by performing the calibration transfer with this method are negligible.","PeriodicalId":15074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-22-0087.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, OCEAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a calibration transfer methodology between radars of the same and different frequency bands. This method enables the absolute calibration of a meteorological radar by transferring it from another co-located instrument with known calibration, by simultaneously measuring vertical cloud reflectivity profiles. The advantage is that the added uncertainty in the newly calibrated instrument can reach the magnitude of the reference instrument calibration. This is achieved by carefully selecting comparable data, including the identification of the reflectivity range that avoids the disparities introduced by differences in sensitivity or scattering regime. The result is a correction coefficient used to compensate measurement bias in the uncalibrated instrument. Calibration transfer uncertainty can be reduced by increasing the number of sampling periods. The methodology was applied between co-located W-band radars deployed during the ICE-GENESIS campaign (Switzerland 2020-2021). A difference of 2.2 dB was found in their reflectivity measurements, with an uncertainty of 0.7 dB. The calibration transfer was also applied to radars of different frequency, an X-band radar with unknown calibration and aW-band radar with manufacturer calibration, the difference found was -16.7 dB with an uncertainty of 1.2 dB. The method was validated through closure, by transferring calibration between three different radars in two different case studies. For the first case, involving three W-band radars, the bias found was of 0.2 dB. In the second case, involving two W-band and one X-band radar, the bias found was of 0.3 dB. These results imply that the biases introduced by performing the calibration transfer with this method are negligible.
基于冰云观测的云雷达标定转移方法
本文提出了一种同频段和不同频段雷达之间的标定传递方法。这种方法通过同时测量垂直云反射率廓线,从另一台已知校准的仪器转移气象雷达的绝对校准。优点是新校准仪器中增加的不确定度可以达到参考仪器校准的幅度。这是通过仔细选择可比较的数据来实现的,包括确定反射率范围,以避免因灵敏度或散射状态的差异而产生的差异。结果是一个校正系数,用于补偿未校准仪器中的测量偏差。可通过增加采样周期数来减小校准传递不确定度。该方法在ICE-GENESIS活动(瑞士2020-2021年)期间部署的同位置w波段雷达之间应用。在他们的反射率测量中发现了2.2 dB的差异,不确定度为0.7 dB。将标定传递应用于不同频率的雷达,未知标定的x波段雷达和制造商标定的aw波段雷达,差值为-16.7 dB,不确定度为1.2 dB。在两个不同的案例研究中,通过在三个不同的雷达之间传递校准,通过闭合验证了该方法。对于第一种情况,涉及三个w波段雷达,发现的偏差为0.2 dB。在第二种情况下,涉及两个w波段和一个x波段雷达,发现的偏差为0.3 dB。这些结果表明,用这种方法进行校准转移所带来的偏差可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
135
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology (JTECH) publishes research describing instrumentation and methods used in atmospheric and oceanic research, including remote sensing instruments; measurements, validation, and data analysis techniques from satellites, aircraft, balloons, and surface-based platforms; in situ instruments, measurements, and methods for data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation and assimilation in numerical models; and information systems and algorithms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信