Capillary Electrophoresis and its Basic Principles in Historical Retrospect. Part 4. Svante Arrhenius´ Electrolyte Dissociation. From 56 Theses (1884) to Theory (1887)

Q1 Arts and Humanities
E. Kenndler
{"title":"Capillary Electrophoresis and its Basic Principles in Historical Retrospect. Part 4. Svante Arrhenius´ Electrolyte Dissociation. From 56 Theses (1884) to Theory (1887)","authors":"E. Kenndler","doi":"10.36253/substantia-1679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the main interest of Svante Arrhenius, a student at Uppsala University, was the electrical conductivity of highly dilute electrolyte solutions, which had not yet been determined at the beginning of the 1880s, he decided to determine experimentally the molecular conductivities of aqueous solutions of about fifty electrolytes and their dependence on the dilution. In his dissertation, which he began in the winter of 1882/1883, he summarized his results and considerations in 56 \"theses\". He observed that strong acids had a high molecular conductivity, which increased only slightly with increasing dilution. Weak acids, in contrast, had low molecular conductivities, but these increased abruptly above a certain dilution. Arrhenius' innovative hypothesis was that electrolyte molecules are composed from two parts, \"an active (electrolytic) and an inactive (non-electrolytic) part,\" with the proportion of the active part increasing with increasing dilution at the expense of the inactive part. Moreover, the electrically active part, which conducts electricity, was also the chemically active part. Arrhenius introduced the activity coefficient, later quoted as the degree of dissociation, which indicated the proportion of active molecules to the sum of active and inactive molecules. He tentatively related activity coefficient to molecular conductivity. He assumed that the higher the activity coefficients of different acids at the same equivalent concentrations, the stronger they are. Arrhenius tested his hypothesis taking the heat of neutralization of acids with a strong base measured by Thomsen and Berthelot. Strong acids developed the highest neutralization heats, i.e., the activation heat of water, since they consisted entirely of active H+ and OH- ions, which combined to inactive H2O. Weak acids developed correspondingly less. The established parallelism between the molecular conductivities of acids and their heats of neutralization was the first proof of Arrhenius' hypothesis. He relied on thermochemistry and completed his dissertation. He presented his dissertation in June 1883 and published it in 1884 to obtain his doctorate. At that time, Wilhelm Ostwald was investigating the affinities of acids to bases, i.e. the intensity of the effects of acids on the rates of reactions they cause. He took the rate constants as a measure of the relative strength of the acids. After receiving Arrhenius' thesis, he measured the acid´s molecular conductivities and found a remarkable proportionality to the reaction rate constants of the hydrolysis of methyl acetate and the inversion of cane sugar caused by them. This was the second proof of Arrhenius' hypothesis, based on the results of chemical kinetics. A memoir presented in 1885 by J. H. van 't Hoff on the analogy between the osmotic pressure of a highly dilute solution separated from the pure solvent by a semipermeable membrane and the pressure of an ideal gas containing the same number of particles as the solution led to probably the most convincing proof of the Arrhenius hypothesis. This analogy corresponded to Avogadro's well-known law, which is PV=RT. He found that the pressure for non-conductors such as glucose followed this law, but was higher for electrolytes. This deviation was accounted for by the van 't Hoff factor i, which indicates into how many particles the solute - at least partially - has dissociated, so that the modified law is PV=iRT. The factor i could be deduced from Raoult's freezing point depression, and could also be calculated using Arrhenius' degree of dissociation α. The degree of dissociation, in turn, was determined from the ratio of the conductivity of a dilute electrolyte solution and that under limiting conditions. The agreement found between the factors i determined by the two independent methods was the third proof of the Arrhenius hypothesis. There was a fourth proof, namely the additivity of physical properties. With these four nonelectrical and independent proofs, the 56 theses of Arrhenius' dissertation became the groundbreaking theory of dissociation of substances dissolved in water, which he published in 1887. In 1903 the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to him \"in recognition of the extraordinary services he has rendered to the advancement of chemistry by his electrolytic theory of dissociation”.","PeriodicalId":32750,"journal":{"name":"Substantia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substantia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/substantia-1679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the main interest of Svante Arrhenius, a student at Uppsala University, was the electrical conductivity of highly dilute electrolyte solutions, which had not yet been determined at the beginning of the 1880s, he decided to determine experimentally the molecular conductivities of aqueous solutions of about fifty electrolytes and their dependence on the dilution. In his dissertation, which he began in the winter of 1882/1883, he summarized his results and considerations in 56 "theses". He observed that strong acids had a high molecular conductivity, which increased only slightly with increasing dilution. Weak acids, in contrast, had low molecular conductivities, but these increased abruptly above a certain dilution. Arrhenius' innovative hypothesis was that electrolyte molecules are composed from two parts, "an active (electrolytic) and an inactive (non-electrolytic) part," with the proportion of the active part increasing with increasing dilution at the expense of the inactive part. Moreover, the electrically active part, which conducts electricity, was also the chemically active part. Arrhenius introduced the activity coefficient, later quoted as the degree of dissociation, which indicated the proportion of active molecules to the sum of active and inactive molecules. He tentatively related activity coefficient to molecular conductivity. He assumed that the higher the activity coefficients of different acids at the same equivalent concentrations, the stronger they are. Arrhenius tested his hypothesis taking the heat of neutralization of acids with a strong base measured by Thomsen and Berthelot. Strong acids developed the highest neutralization heats, i.e., the activation heat of water, since they consisted entirely of active H+ and OH- ions, which combined to inactive H2O. Weak acids developed correspondingly less. The established parallelism between the molecular conductivities of acids and their heats of neutralization was the first proof of Arrhenius' hypothesis. He relied on thermochemistry and completed his dissertation. He presented his dissertation in June 1883 and published it in 1884 to obtain his doctorate. At that time, Wilhelm Ostwald was investigating the affinities of acids to bases, i.e. the intensity of the effects of acids on the rates of reactions they cause. He took the rate constants as a measure of the relative strength of the acids. After receiving Arrhenius' thesis, he measured the acid´s molecular conductivities and found a remarkable proportionality to the reaction rate constants of the hydrolysis of methyl acetate and the inversion of cane sugar caused by them. This was the second proof of Arrhenius' hypothesis, based on the results of chemical kinetics. A memoir presented in 1885 by J. H. van 't Hoff on the analogy between the osmotic pressure of a highly dilute solution separated from the pure solvent by a semipermeable membrane and the pressure of an ideal gas containing the same number of particles as the solution led to probably the most convincing proof of the Arrhenius hypothesis. This analogy corresponded to Avogadro's well-known law, which is PV=RT. He found that the pressure for non-conductors such as glucose followed this law, but was higher for electrolytes. This deviation was accounted for by the van 't Hoff factor i, which indicates into how many particles the solute - at least partially - has dissociated, so that the modified law is PV=iRT. The factor i could be deduced from Raoult's freezing point depression, and could also be calculated using Arrhenius' degree of dissociation α. The degree of dissociation, in turn, was determined from the ratio of the conductivity of a dilute electrolyte solution and that under limiting conditions. The agreement found between the factors i determined by the two independent methods was the third proof of the Arrhenius hypothesis. There was a fourth proof, namely the additivity of physical properties. With these four nonelectrical and independent proofs, the 56 theses of Arrhenius' dissertation became the groundbreaking theory of dissociation of substances dissolved in water, which he published in 1887. In 1903 the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to him "in recognition of the extraordinary services he has rendered to the advancement of chemistry by his electrolytic theory of dissociation”.
毛细管电泳及其基本原理的历史回顾第4部分。Svante Arrhenius的电解质解离。从《56篇论纲》(1884)到《理论》(1887)
由于乌普萨拉大学的学生Svante Arrhenius的主要兴趣是高度稀释的电解质溶液的电导率,这在19世纪80年代初还没有被确定,他决定通过实验来确定大约50种电解质水溶液的分子电导率及其对稀释度的依赖。在他的论文中,他开始于1882/1883年的冬天,他总结了他的56个“论文”的结果和考虑。他观察到强酸具有很高的分子电导率,随着稀释度的增加,电导率仅略有增加。相反,弱酸的分子电导率低,但在一定稀释度以上会突然增加。阿伦尼乌斯的创新假设是,电解质分子由“活性(电解)部分和非活性(非电解)部分”两部分组成,随着稀释度的增加,活性部分的比例增加,而非活性部分的比例则降低。此外,导电的电活性部分也是化学活性部分。阿伦尼乌斯引入活度系数,后来被引用为解离度,表示活性分子与活性分子和非活性分子之和的比例。他试探性地把活度系数与分子电导率联系起来。他认为在相同的浓度下,不同酸的活度系数越高,它们的活性就越强。阿伦尼乌斯用汤姆逊和贝特洛测量的强碱中和酸的热来验证他的假设。强酸产生了最高的中和热,即水的活化热,因为它们完全由活性H+和OH-离子组成,它们结合成非活性H2O。弱酸的发展相对较少。酸的分子电导率和中和热之间的平行关系是阿累尼乌斯假说的第一个证明。他依靠热化学完成了他的论文。他于1883年6月提交了论文,并于1884年发表,获得了博士学位。当时,威廉·奥斯特瓦尔德(Wilhelm Ostwald)正在研究酸与碱的亲和力,即酸对其引起的反应速率的影响强度。他用速率常数来衡量酸的相对强度。在收到阿伦尼乌斯的论文后,他测量了酸的分子电导率,发现其与醋酸甲酯水解和蔗糖转化的反应速率常数成显著的比例关系。这是基于化学动力学结果的阿累尼乌斯假设的第二个证明。范霍夫在1885年发表的一篇回忆录中,将半透膜从纯溶剂中分离出来的高度稀释溶液的渗透压与含有相同粒子数量的理想气体的压力进行了类比,这可能是对阿伦尼乌斯假说最有说服力的证明。这个类比符合阿伏伽德罗著名的PV=RT定律。他发现像葡萄糖这样的非导体的压力遵循这个规律,但电解质的压力更高。这种偏差是由范特霍夫因子i来解释的,它表明溶质至少部分地解离了多少粒子,因此修正后的定律是PV=iRT。因子i可由Raoult凝固点下降公式推导,也可由Arrhenius解离度α公式计算。反过来,解离程度由稀电解质溶液的电导率与极限条件下的电导率之比决定。由两种独立的方法确定的因素之间的一致性是阿累尼乌斯假说的第三个证明。还有第四个证明,即物理性质的可加性。有了这四个非电学和独立的证明,阿伦尼乌斯的56篇论文成为了溶解在水中的物质解离的开创性理论,他于1887年发表了这篇论文。1903年,诺贝尔化学奖授予他,“以表彰他通过电解离解理论对化学进步所做出的非凡贡献”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substantia
Substantia Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信