An evaluation of the distribution of imported lithics within the Yazoo-Mississippi Delta during the Poverty Point period

Q1 Social Sciences
W. Mitch
{"title":"An evaluation of the distribution of imported lithics within the Yazoo-Mississippi Delta during the Poverty Point period","authors":"W. Mitch","doi":"10.1080/0734578X.2023.2186766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n One cultural hallmark of the Poverty Point culture in the Yazoo-Mississippi Delta is the importation of lithic materials for fashioning everyday tools from sources in Arkansas, the Ohio and Tennessee River valleys, and southeastern Missouri. Previous research characterizing the distribution of imported cherts has documented a high intensity of imported chert usage at a cluster of sites near Poverty Point and at several other sites, suggesting that these sites served as centers from which imported lithics were disseminated to sites throughout the Delta. Since these studies focused on a limited number of sites in subsections of the Delta, it is difficult to gauge the importance of imported lithics basin wide. Assigning source regions to ∼57,000 chert artifacts from 81 collections from 46 Poverty Point sites, this study quantified the distribution of imported cherts throughout the Delta. The objective was to evaluate the areal extent of high-intensity usage of imported cherts, shedding light on both the density of imported cherts throughout the basin and the role of sites posited as dissemination hubs. The presence/absence of imported hematite, magnetite, quartz crystal, black chert, Tallahatta sandstone, and steatite were also noted. The analysis indicated that while the occurrence of imported cherts was widespread, sites featuring high densities of imported cherts were limited. The Poverty Point site and only a few sites located just east of Poverty Point exhibited high densities of northern gray flints. Arkansas novaculite usage was high within Arkansas but declined with distance from the Ouachita Mountain source region along the Ouachita and Arkansas River corridors. Missouri white cherts were less intensively exploited, but evidence suggests a decline with distance from the Mississippi River. While imported lithics were important at Jaketown and certain other sites in northwestern Mississippi, neighboring sites indicated low densities. Although the occurrence of imported cherts at sites throughout the Delta testifies to their widespread availability, densities typically were low except for a limited number of sites that may have served as economically or spiritually important aggregation centers.","PeriodicalId":34945,"journal":{"name":"Southeastern Archaeology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southeastern Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0734578X.2023.2186766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT One cultural hallmark of the Poverty Point culture in the Yazoo-Mississippi Delta is the importation of lithic materials for fashioning everyday tools from sources in Arkansas, the Ohio and Tennessee River valleys, and southeastern Missouri. Previous research characterizing the distribution of imported cherts has documented a high intensity of imported chert usage at a cluster of sites near Poverty Point and at several other sites, suggesting that these sites served as centers from which imported lithics were disseminated to sites throughout the Delta. Since these studies focused on a limited number of sites in subsections of the Delta, it is difficult to gauge the importance of imported lithics basin wide. Assigning source regions to ∼57,000 chert artifacts from 81 collections from 46 Poverty Point sites, this study quantified the distribution of imported cherts throughout the Delta. The objective was to evaluate the areal extent of high-intensity usage of imported cherts, shedding light on both the density of imported cherts throughout the basin and the role of sites posited as dissemination hubs. The presence/absence of imported hematite, magnetite, quartz crystal, black chert, Tallahatta sandstone, and steatite were also noted. The analysis indicated that while the occurrence of imported cherts was widespread, sites featuring high densities of imported cherts were limited. The Poverty Point site and only a few sites located just east of Poverty Point exhibited high densities of northern gray flints. Arkansas novaculite usage was high within Arkansas but declined with distance from the Ouachita Mountain source region along the Ouachita and Arkansas River corridors. Missouri white cherts were less intensively exploited, but evidence suggests a decline with distance from the Mississippi River. While imported lithics were important at Jaketown and certain other sites in northwestern Mississippi, neighboring sites indicated low densities. Although the occurrence of imported cherts at sites throughout the Delta testifies to their widespread availability, densities typically were low except for a limited number of sites that may have served as economically or spiritually important aggregation centers.
贫困点时期进口锂在Yazoo密西西比三角洲的分布评估
摘要密西西比三角洲雅祖贫困点文化的一个文化标志是从阿肯色州、俄亥俄州和田纳西河谷以及密苏里州东南部进口用于制作日常工具的石器材料。先前对进口燧石分布进行的研究表明,贫困点附近的一组地点和其他几个地点的进口燧石使用强度很高,这表明这些地点是进口锂石传播到整个三角洲地区的中心。由于这些研究的重点是三角洲分区中数量有限的地点,因此很难衡量全流域进口锂石的重要性。本研究对来自46个贫困点遗址的81个藏品中的~57000件燧石文物进行了来源区域划分,量化了整个三角洲进口燧石的分布。目的是评估进口燧石高强度使用的区域范围,揭示整个盆地进口燧石的密度以及作为传播中心的地点的作用。还注意到存在/不存在进口赤铁矿、磁铁矿、石英晶体、黑色燧石、塔拉哈塔砂岩和滑石。分析表明,虽然进口燧石的出现很普遍,但进口燧石密度高的地点有限。贫困点遗址和位于贫困点以东的少数几个遗址显示出高密度的北方灰色燧石。阿肯色州Novaculate在阿肯色州的使用率很高,但随着距离Ouachita和阿肯色河走廊沿线的Ouachitta山源区的距离而下降。密苏里州的白燧石开采较少,但有证据表明,随着距离密西西比河的距离,白燧石的开采量有所下降。虽然进口的锂在Jaketown和密西西比州西北部的某些其他地点很重要,但邻近地点的密度较低。尽管进口燧石在整个三角洲地区的出现证明了它们的广泛可用性,但密度通常很低,只有少数地区可能是经济或精神上重要的聚集中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Southeastern Archaeology
Southeastern Archaeology Social Sciences-Archeology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Southeastern Archaeology is a refereed journal that publishes works concerning the archaeology and history of southeastern North America and neighboring regions. It covers all time periods, from Paleoindian to recent history and defines the southeast broadly; this could be anything from Florida (south) to Wisconsin (North) and from Oklahoma (west) to Virginia (east). Reports or articles that cover neighboring regions such as the Northeast, Plains, or Caribbean would be considered if they had sufficient relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信