Indications for Caesarean Section for women of low obstetric risk - an audit

Murete Sanare Lukumay, Jane Kokushubila Muzo, A. Kikula, Peter J T Wangwe, A. Pembe
{"title":"Indications for Caesarean Section for women of low obstetric risk - an audit","authors":"Murete Sanare Lukumay, Jane Kokushubila Muzo, A. Kikula, Peter J T Wangwe, A. Pembe","doi":"10.4314/ssmj.v16i1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The Caesarean Section (CS) rate is dramatically increasing across obstetric populations. This study aimed to determine the adherence to  criteria for standard diagnosis of the common indications for CS among women of a low-risk group. This group, known as group 3 in the Robson  classification, is multiparous, term with singleton pregnancy and have not had a previous CS. \nMethods: We conducted a cross-sectional study at Muhimbili National Hospital from August to December 2018. The criteria for standard diagnosis of  foetal distress, obstructed labour, arrested labour and cephalopelvic disproportion were adopted from peer groups publications based on local expert  consensus. Data were analysed using a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 20. \nResults: A total of 1,670 emergency CS’s were performed during the study period, 392 (23.5%) were women of Robson group 3, of these women 101  (25.8%) had foetal distress, 92 (23.5%) obstructed labour, 88 (22.4%) arrested labour and 64 (16.4%) cephalopelvic disproportion. The proportion of CS’s  which met the criteria for standard diagnosis of indications for CS were 61.4% foetal distress, 52.2% obstructed labour, 58% arrested labour, and 45.3%  CPD with total average of 55.1%. \nConclusion: Generally, the standard criteria for audited indications of CS have been met by 55.1% during the study period. Thus, follow up, on the job  training and updating about adherence to standard criteria for best practice are recommended.","PeriodicalId":56200,"journal":{"name":"South Sudan Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Sudan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ssmj.v16i1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Caesarean Section (CS) rate is dramatically increasing across obstetric populations. This study aimed to determine the adherence to  criteria for standard diagnosis of the common indications for CS among women of a low-risk group. This group, known as group 3 in the Robson  classification, is multiparous, term with singleton pregnancy and have not had a previous CS. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study at Muhimbili National Hospital from August to December 2018. The criteria for standard diagnosis of  foetal distress, obstructed labour, arrested labour and cephalopelvic disproportion were adopted from peer groups publications based on local expert  consensus. Data were analysed using a statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 20. Results: A total of 1,670 emergency CS’s were performed during the study period, 392 (23.5%) were women of Robson group 3, of these women 101  (25.8%) had foetal distress, 92 (23.5%) obstructed labour, 88 (22.4%) arrested labour and 64 (16.4%) cephalopelvic disproportion. The proportion of CS’s  which met the criteria for standard diagnosis of indications for CS were 61.4% foetal distress, 52.2% obstructed labour, 58% arrested labour, and 45.3%  CPD with total average of 55.1%. Conclusion: Generally, the standard criteria for audited indications of CS have been met by 55.1% during the study period. Thus, follow up, on the job  training and updating about adherence to standard criteria for best practice are recommended.
低产科风险妇女剖腹产的适应症——一项审计
剖宫产率在产科人群中急剧上升。本研究旨在确定低危组女性CS常见适应症的标准诊断标准的依从性。这一组,在罗布森分类中被称为第三组,是多胎,单胎妊娠,以前没有CS。方法:我们于2018年8月至12月在Muhimbili国立医院进行了横断面研究。胎儿窘迫、难产、阵痛和头骨盆比例失调的标准诊断标准采用同行出版物,以当地专家共识为基础。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)第20版分析数据。结果:本研究期间共施行急诊CS 1670例,其中Robson组3 392例(23.5%),其中胎儿窘迫101例(25.8%),难产92例(23.5%),阵痛88例(22.4%),头骨盆比例失调64例(16.4%)。符合CS标准诊断指征的比例为胎儿窘迫61.4%,难产52.2%,阵痛停顿58%,CPD 45.3%,总平均55.1%。结论:总体而言,研究期间CS审计适应症的标准符合率为55.1%。因此,建议对最佳实践的标准标准进行跟踪、在职培训和更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书