Hoarding essential products during the COVID-19 pandemic

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
A. Hassi, G. Storti
{"title":"Hoarding essential products during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"A. Hassi, G. Storti","doi":"10.1108/tcj-08-2021-0118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nResearch methodology\nThis case was created based on secondary sources available in the public domain (i.e. news articles). This case has been taught in an undergraduate course of principles of management under the chapter on ethics.\n\n\nCase overview/synopsis\nWhen the COVID-19 pandemic broke out, people panicked and rushed to purchase essential products such as hand sanitizers, antibacterial soaps, disinfectant wipes and face masks. The images of a panicked public inspired the brothers Matt and Noah Colvin who amassed and hoarded stockpiles of these essential products to make immense profit. They claimed that their trade approach was legitimate. Yet by an ironic twist of fate, their unorthodox acts were revealed in the media and consequences came in threes: the public vilified the hoarders, the online marketplaces kicked them out and the authorities opened an investigation about alleged price-gouging practices.\n\n\nComplexity academic level\nThis case study may be used in classroom discussions on the concepts of hoarding and price gouging in the following academic programs: bachelor’s in business administration, master of science in business administration and MBA programs. This case study may be used in the following academic courses: ethics in business, responsible management, fundamental of management and organizational behavior.\n","PeriodicalId":52298,"journal":{"name":"CASE Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CASE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tcj-08-2021-0118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research methodology This case was created based on secondary sources available in the public domain (i.e. news articles). This case has been taught in an undergraduate course of principles of management under the chapter on ethics. Case overview/synopsis When the COVID-19 pandemic broke out, people panicked and rushed to purchase essential products such as hand sanitizers, antibacterial soaps, disinfectant wipes and face masks. The images of a panicked public inspired the brothers Matt and Noah Colvin who amassed and hoarded stockpiles of these essential products to make immense profit. They claimed that their trade approach was legitimate. Yet by an ironic twist of fate, their unorthodox acts were revealed in the media and consequences came in threes: the public vilified the hoarders, the online marketplaces kicked them out and the authorities opened an investigation about alleged price-gouging practices. Complexity academic level This case study may be used in classroom discussions on the concepts of hoarding and price gouging in the following academic programs: bachelor’s in business administration, master of science in business administration and MBA programs. This case study may be used in the following academic courses: ethics in business, responsible management, fundamental of management and organizational behavior.
新冠肺炎大流行期间囤积必需品
研究方法本案例是根据公共领域的二级来源(即新闻文章)创建的。这一案例已在管理原理本科课程的伦理学章节中教授。病例概述/综述当新冠肺炎疫情爆发时,人们惊慌失措,争相购买洗手液、抗菌肥皂、消毒湿巾和口罩等基本产品。恐慌的公众形象激发了马特和诺亚·科尔文兄弟的灵感,他们积累并囤积了这些基本产品的库存,以赚取巨额利润。他们声称他们的贸易方式是合法的。然而,具有讽刺意味的是,他们的非正统行为被媒体曝光,后果是三重的:公众诋毁囤积者,网络市场将他们踢出市场,当局对涉嫌的价格欺诈行为展开调查。复杂性学术水平本案例研究可用于以下学术课程中囤积和哄抬价格概念的课堂讨论:工商管理学士、工商管理理学硕士和MBA课程。本案例研究可用于以下学术课程:商业伦理、负责任管理、管理基础和组织行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CASE Journal
CASE Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信