Listiyono Budi, A. Widodo, B. Haryadi, Bambang Endroyo, D. Wicaksono, Triono Subagio
{"title":"Optimization Analysis of The Strength Capacity and The Economic Value Comparison of Castellated Steel Beam and Its Equivalent IWF Beam","authors":"Listiyono Budi, A. Widodo, B. Haryadi, Bambang Endroyo, D. Wicaksono, Triono Subagio","doi":"10.15294/jtsp.v23i2.31942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research is aimed to figure out the comparison of the strength capacity and economic value comparison of castellated steel beam to its equivalent IWF beam. The profile of the castellated steel beam in this study included all profiles of castellated steel beam on the market based on the products catalog of the castellated steel beam from PT. Gunung Garuda. The finite element method was used in this study with the aid from Abaqus program to get a comparison of the strength capacity of castellated steel beam to its equivalent IWF beam. The next stage next involved the calculation of a comparison of the economic value of the castellated steel beam with hexagonal holes with to its equivalent IWF beam. The results of the study showed that the castellated steel beam experienced an increase in the strength capacity of 1,189 up to 2,330 times compared to its equivalent IWF beam. The comparison of the strength capacity between the castellated steel beam and its equivalent IWF beam is at 1,010 up to 1,539. Based on the combination between the comparison of strength capacity and the economic value, there are 14 (58.33%) profiles of the castellated steel beam which is categorized as efficient in terms of the design of the structure and cost, there are four (16.67%) profiles of the castellated steel beam which is categorized as efficient in terms of the design of the structure but not efficient in terms of cost, and there are 6 (25.00%) profiles of the castellated steel beam which is categorized as inefficient in terms of the design of the structure and cost. The results of this study indicate that the castellated steel beam can replace its equivalent IWF beam. Selection of profile of the castellated steel beam is appropriate to provide efficiency in terms of weight of the structure between 58.5% to 15.1% and can provide efficiency in terms of cost of between 48.4% to 0.9%.","PeriodicalId":31108,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jtsp.v23i2.31942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The research is aimed to figure out the comparison of the strength capacity and economic value comparison of castellated steel beam to its equivalent IWF beam. The profile of the castellated steel beam in this study included all profiles of castellated steel beam on the market based on the products catalog of the castellated steel beam from PT. Gunung Garuda. The finite element method was used in this study with the aid from Abaqus program to get a comparison of the strength capacity of castellated steel beam to its equivalent IWF beam. The next stage next involved the calculation of a comparison of the economic value of the castellated steel beam with hexagonal holes with to its equivalent IWF beam. The results of the study showed that the castellated steel beam experienced an increase in the strength capacity of 1,189 up to 2,330 times compared to its equivalent IWF beam. The comparison of the strength capacity between the castellated steel beam and its equivalent IWF beam is at 1,010 up to 1,539. Based on the combination between the comparison of strength capacity and the economic value, there are 14 (58.33%) profiles of the castellated steel beam which is categorized as efficient in terms of the design of the structure and cost, there are four (16.67%) profiles of the castellated steel beam which is categorized as efficient in terms of the design of the structure but not efficient in terms of cost, and there are 6 (25.00%) profiles of the castellated steel beam which is categorized as inefficient in terms of the design of the structure and cost. The results of this study indicate that the castellated steel beam can replace its equivalent IWF beam. Selection of profile of the castellated steel beam is appropriate to provide efficiency in terms of weight of the structure between 58.5% to 15.1% and can provide efficiency in terms of cost of between 48.4% to 0.9%.
本研究旨在对蜂窝钢梁与其等效IWF梁的强度承载力和经济价值进行比较。根据PT Gunung Garuda的槽型钢梁产品目录,本研究中的槽型钢型材包括市场上所有的槽型钢构件。本研究采用有限元方法,借助Abaqus程序,对蜂窝钢梁与其等效IWF梁的强度承载力进行了比较。下一阶段是计算具有六角孔的蜂窝钢梁与其等效IWF梁的经济价值的比较。研究结果表明,与等效IWF梁相比,蜂窝钢梁的强度承载力提高了1189倍,达到2330倍。蜂窝钢梁与其等效IWF梁之间的强度承载力比较为1010至1539。根据强度承载力与经济价值的比较,共有14种(58.33%)槽形钢梁型材在结构设计和成本方面被归类为有效型材,有四个(16.67%)槽形钢梁型材在结构设计方面被分类为有效但在成本方面不有效,有六个(25.00%)槽形主梁型材在结构和成本设计方面被归类为低效。研究结果表明,蜂窝钢梁可以取代其等效的IWF梁。蜂窝钢梁的轮廓的选择适合于提供58.5%至15.1%的结构重量方面的效率,并且可以提供48.4%至0.9%的成本方面的效率。