Nephrologist-Led Simulation-Based Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Workshop for Medical Students: Insights and Implications

Abhilash Koratala , Hari R. Paudel , Kevin R. Regner
{"title":"Nephrologist-Led Simulation-Based Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Workshop for Medical Students: Insights and Implications","authors":"Abhilash Koratala ,&nbsp;Hari R. Paudel ,&nbsp;Kevin R. Regner","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is being increasingly recognized as an adjunct to physical examination. However, limited availability of trained faculty in specialties other than emergency medicine and lack of universal training standards remain key barriers to its widespread integration into undergraduate and graduate medical curricula. In this study, we sought to explore the effectiveness of a short simulation-based workshop for medical students teaching basic cardiac ultrasound led by a nephrologist.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Workshops were conducted for 2 different groups of 4th-year medical students with a total of 25 attendees. The workshop consisted of a 1-hour lecture followed by 15 minutes of cardiac anatomy simulation and a 2- to 2.5-hour hands-on session in the simulation laboratory. An anonymous precourse questionnaire comprising 10 questions assessing the interpretation of common grayscale ultrasound findings encountered in patients with undifferentiated hypotension was performed. After the workshop, a postcourse exam and survey were conducted, retesting the same concepts and seeking the students’ feedback on the course.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 23 and 20 students answered the pre- and postcourse surveys, respectively. The mean total score on the pretest was 63.8% ± 13.6%, which significantly increased to 91.5% ± 10.5% on the posttest (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). About 90% of the respondents strongly agreed that the cardiac anatomy simulation improved their understanding of the cardiac sonographic anatomy; 75% strongly agreed that the hands-on simulation enhanced their confidence in image acquisition and interpretation; and 70% said they would choose nephrology elective if POCUS training was integrated with it.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A nephrologist-led diagnostic POCUS workshop using simulation techniques is effective in improving the learners’ knowledge, understanding of the sonographic cardiac anatomy, and confidence in image acquisition. Integration of POCUS training may increase medical student interest in nephrology elective rotations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medicine open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667036423000213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is being increasingly recognized as an adjunct to physical examination. However, limited availability of trained faculty in specialties other than emergency medicine and lack of universal training standards remain key barriers to its widespread integration into undergraduate and graduate medical curricula. In this study, we sought to explore the effectiveness of a short simulation-based workshop for medical students teaching basic cardiac ultrasound led by a nephrologist.

Methods

Workshops were conducted for 2 different groups of 4th-year medical students with a total of 25 attendees. The workshop consisted of a 1-hour lecture followed by 15 minutes of cardiac anatomy simulation and a 2- to 2.5-hour hands-on session in the simulation laboratory. An anonymous precourse questionnaire comprising 10 questions assessing the interpretation of common grayscale ultrasound findings encountered in patients with undifferentiated hypotension was performed. After the workshop, a postcourse exam and survey were conducted, retesting the same concepts and seeking the students’ feedback on the course.

Results

In total, 23 and 20 students answered the pre- and postcourse surveys, respectively. The mean total score on the pretest was 63.8% ± 13.6%, which significantly increased to 91.5% ± 10.5% on the posttest (P < .001). About 90% of the respondents strongly agreed that the cardiac anatomy simulation improved their understanding of the cardiac sonographic anatomy; 75% strongly agreed that the hands-on simulation enhanced their confidence in image acquisition and interpretation; and 70% said they would choose nephrology elective if POCUS training was integrated with it.

Conclusions

A nephrologist-led diagnostic POCUS workshop using simulation techniques is effective in improving the learners’ knowledge, understanding of the sonographic cardiac anatomy, and confidence in image acquisition. Integration of POCUS training may increase medical student interest in nephrology elective rotations.

肾病学家领导的医学生模拟聚焦心脏超声研讨会:见解和启示
背景:即时超声检查(POCUS)越来越被认为是身体检查的辅助手段。然而,急诊医学以外专业训练有素的教师数量有限,缺乏普遍的培训标准,仍然是将其广泛纳入本科和研究生医学课程的主要障碍。在这项研究中,我们试图探索由肾病专家领导的以模拟为基础的短期医学学生心脏超声教学研讨会的有效性。方法对两组四年级医学生进行研讨会,共25人参加。研讨会包括1小时的讲座,随后是15分钟的心脏解剖模拟和2至2.5小时的模拟实验室实践环节。一份包含10个问题的匿名术前问卷评估了未分化性低血压患者常见的灰度超声结果的解释。工作坊结束后,进行了课后考试和调查,重新测试相同的概念,并寻求学生对课程的反馈。结果共有23名学生参加了课前调查,20名学生参加了课后调查。前测平均总分为63.8%±13.6%,后测平均总分为91.5%±10.5% (P <措施)。约90%的受访者强烈同意心脏解剖模拟提高了他们对心脏超声解剖的理解;75%的人强烈同意,动手模拟增强了他们对图像采集和解释的信心;70%的人表示,如果POCUS培训与之相结合,他们会选择肾脏病选修课。结论肾内科医生主导的POCUS模拟诊断研习班能够有效提高学习者对超声心脏解剖的认识和理解,增强图像采集的信心。整合POCUS训练可能会增加医学生对肾脏学选修轮转的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of medicine open
American journal of medicine open Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信