Composting municipal solid waste for agriculture in Northern Ghana: Rural farmers’ willingness to pay for compost quality and access attributes

Q open Pub Date : 2022-04-08 DOI:10.1093/qopen/qoac012
Edward B. Daadi, U. Latacz-Lohmann
{"title":"Composting municipal solid waste for agriculture in Northern Ghana: Rural farmers’ willingness to pay for compost quality and access attributes","authors":"Edward B. Daadi, U. Latacz-Lohmann","doi":"10.1093/qopen/qoac012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n While farmers in rural areas of northern Ghana find it difficult to obtain sufficient organic soil amendments to keep their soil healthy, there is not enough demand for city compost factories attempting to clean cities of organic solid waste to sustain composting rate at waste-clearing levels. In this study, 398 farmers in rural communities were surveyed in order to estimate the willingness-to-pay for different quality and access attributes of municipal solid waste (MSW) compost and examine how demand for it can be boosted among such farmers. Several specifications of the generalized multinomial logit (G-MNL) model, using farmers’ choice data, revealed that the compost quality and market access attributes surveyed in the study significantly affect farmers’ decision to buy MSW compost. The results also showed that preferences for the attributes vary widely among the farmers, mainly due to some unobserved personal factors. On average, the empirical estimates indicate that for a 50 kg compost bag, farmers are willing to pay GHS 9.43 for brand/label, GHS 5.76 for pelletized compost, GHS 4.49 for delivery in the community, and GHS 2.49 for sales when they have their cash windfall. Farmers face an average disutility of at least GHS 33.36 for deciding not to buy compost, regardless of its attributes, indicating that besides the attributes captured by the study, other factors important to farmers influence their purchase decisions. Significantly discounted prices together with improved compost quality increase the probability of compost purchase. Thus, overall the findings highlight the need to subsidize MSW compost by more than 50 per cent, to sell it in pelletized form and branded/labelled packages while making it accessible to rural farmers during their cash windfall.","PeriodicalId":87350,"journal":{"name":"Q open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Q open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoac012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While farmers in rural areas of northern Ghana find it difficult to obtain sufficient organic soil amendments to keep their soil healthy, there is not enough demand for city compost factories attempting to clean cities of organic solid waste to sustain composting rate at waste-clearing levels. In this study, 398 farmers in rural communities were surveyed in order to estimate the willingness-to-pay for different quality and access attributes of municipal solid waste (MSW) compost and examine how demand for it can be boosted among such farmers. Several specifications of the generalized multinomial logit (G-MNL) model, using farmers’ choice data, revealed that the compost quality and market access attributes surveyed in the study significantly affect farmers’ decision to buy MSW compost. The results also showed that preferences for the attributes vary widely among the farmers, mainly due to some unobserved personal factors. On average, the empirical estimates indicate that for a 50 kg compost bag, farmers are willing to pay GHS 9.43 for brand/label, GHS 5.76 for pelletized compost, GHS 4.49 for delivery in the community, and GHS 2.49 for sales when they have their cash windfall. Farmers face an average disutility of at least GHS 33.36 for deciding not to buy compost, regardless of its attributes, indicating that besides the attributes captured by the study, other factors important to farmers influence their purchase decisions. Significantly discounted prices together with improved compost quality increase the probability of compost purchase. Thus, overall the findings highlight the need to subsidize MSW compost by more than 50 per cent, to sell it in pelletized form and branded/labelled packages while making it accessible to rural farmers during their cash windfall.
加纳北部城市固体废物堆肥用于农业:农村农民愿意为堆肥质量和获取属性付费
虽然加纳北部农村地区的农民发现很难获得足够的有机土壤改良剂来保持土壤健康,但对试图清洁城市有机固体废物的城市堆肥厂的需求不足,无法将堆肥率维持在废物清理水平。在这项研究中,对农村社区的398名农民进行了调查,以评估他们为城市固体废物堆肥的不同质量和获取属性付费的意愿,并研究如何提高这些农民对堆肥的需求。使用农民选择数据的广义多项式logit(G-MNL)模型的几个规范表明,研究中调查的堆肥质量和市场准入属性显著影响农民购买城市生活垃圾堆肥的决定。研究结果还表明,农民对这些属性的偏好差异很大,主要是由于一些未观察到的个人因素。平均而言,经验估计表明,对于一个50公斤的堆肥袋,当农民有现金横财时,他们愿意为品牌/标签支付9.43 GHS,为颗粒堆肥支付5.76 GHS,在社区交付支付4.49 GHS,并为销售支付2.49 GHS。无论堆肥的属性如何,农民决定不购买堆肥的平均不效用至少为33.36 GHS,这表明除了研究所获得的属性外,其他对农民重要的因素也会影响他们的购买决定。大幅折扣的价格加上堆肥质量的提高,增加了购买堆肥的可能性。因此,总体而言,研究结果强调,有必要补贴50%以上的城市生活垃圾堆肥,以颗粒形式和品牌/标签包装出售,同时让农村农民在获得现金横财时可以获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信