Competent or Competitive? How Employee Representatives Gain Influence in Organizational Decision‐Making

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Ana Belén García, Lourdes Munduate, Patricia Elgoibar, Hein Wendt, M. Euwema
{"title":"Competent or Competitive? How Employee Representatives Gain Influence in Organizational Decision‐Making","authors":"Ana Belén García, Lourdes Munduate, Patricia Elgoibar, Hein Wendt, M. Euwema","doi":"10.1111/NCMR.12093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conflicts of interest between management and employees are part of organizational life. To manage these conflicts, employee representatives (ERs) often participate in organizational decision‐making. The objectives of this article were to investigate the relation between perceived competences of ERs and their influence on organizational decision‐making in different types of issues, and the mediating effect of ERs’ conflict behaviors on these relations. To test the hypotheses, which are based on theories of power and conglomerate conflict behavior, survey data from 614 human resources directors from 11 European countries were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results show that perceived competences are positively related to the influence of ERs on decision‐making, both for traditional and for innovative issues. Perceived competence is positively related to cooperative and negatively related to competitive conflict behavior. Conglomerate conflict behavior partly mediates the relation between perceived competences and influence. Implications for representative influence are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45732,"journal":{"name":"Negotiation and Conflict Management Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/NCMR.12093","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Negotiation and Conflict Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/NCMR.12093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Conflicts of interest between management and employees are part of organizational life. To manage these conflicts, employee representatives (ERs) often participate in organizational decision‐making. The objectives of this article were to investigate the relation between perceived competences of ERs and their influence on organizational decision‐making in different types of issues, and the mediating effect of ERs’ conflict behaviors on these relations. To test the hypotheses, which are based on theories of power and conglomerate conflict behavior, survey data from 614 human resources directors from 11 European countries were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results show that perceived competences are positively related to the influence of ERs on decision‐making, both for traditional and for innovative issues. Perceived competence is positively related to cooperative and negatively related to competitive conflict behavior. Conglomerate conflict behavior partly mediates the relation between perceived competences and influence. Implications for representative influence are discussed.
有能力还是有竞争力?员工代表如何在组织决策中获得影响力
管理层和员工之间的利益冲突是组织生活的一部分。为了管理这些冲突,员工代表(er)经常参与组织决策。本研究旨在探讨在不同类型的问题中,员工感知能力与其对组织决策的影响之间的关系,以及员工冲突行为对这种关系的中介作用。为了验证基于权力与集团冲突行为理论的假设,我们使用结构方程模型对来自11个欧洲国家的614名人力资源主管的调查数据进行了分析。结果表明,无论是在传统问题上还是在创新问题上,感知能力与企业绩效对决策的影响呈正相关。感知能力与合作冲突行为正相关,与竞争冲突行为负相关。集团冲突行为在感知能力与影响力的关系中起部分中介作用。讨论了代表性影响的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信