Selecting Instructional Interventions for Students with Mild Disabilities in Inclusive Classrooms.

Marie C. Keel, H. Dangel, Sherie H. Owens
{"title":"Selecting Instructional Interventions for Students with Mild Disabilities in Inclusive Classrooms.","authors":"Marie C. Keel, H. Dangel, Sherie H. Owens","doi":"10.17161/FOEC.V31I8.6769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Of the many changes taking place in the field of education, one of the most significant is the movement toward inclusion (McLeskey, Henry, & Hodges, 1998). Students with mild disabilities are being served in the general education classroom to a greater extent. In addition to students with identified disabilities, many students are considered at risk for disabilities. To provide effective instruction for this wide array of students, general educators must be armed with the knowledge and skills to provide assessment and intervention strategies that are potent, yet efficient enough to be implemented in the general education classroom . . Research evidence on effective strategies for increasing the academic achievement of students with mild disabilities in inclusion classes is limited (Fisher, Schumaker, & Deshler, 1996). Relatively few studies have been conducted in inclusion settings, and the results are often disappointing and meager (Baker & Zigmond, 1995; Zigmond et al., 1995). In a multi-state study of the effectiveness of restructuring schools to provide effective inclusion programs, nearly half of the students with mild disabilities continued to fall farther behind (Zigmond et al., 1995). Although many texts are devoted to inclusion practices (Kochhar & West, 1996; McCoy, 1995; Meyen, Vergason, & Whelan, 1996; Stainback & Stainback, 1990, 1992, 1996; Thousand, Villa, & Nevin, 1994; Villa, Thousand, Stainback, & Stainback, 1992; Wang, 1992; Zionts, 1997), few provide specific information regarding academic interventions for students with mild disabilities in the general education classroom. Lawrence (1988) does provide some basic guidelines for teachers, such as using a set schedule, developing clear rules and expectations, being consistent, providing clear directions, structuring transition times, and developing positive relationships with parents. Some instructional strategies recommended for inclusion include, but are not limited to, direct instruction for the acquisition of new skills, peer tutoring, cooperative learning, and self-instructional strategies (Lawrence, 1988; Vergason & Anderegg, 1991). In this article we will discuss inclusion intervention strategies and provide a rationale for each.","PeriodicalId":89924,"journal":{"name":"Focus on exceptional children","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus on exceptional children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/FOEC.V31I8.6769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Of the many changes taking place in the field of education, one of the most significant is the movement toward inclusion (McLeskey, Henry, & Hodges, 1998). Students with mild disabilities are being served in the general education classroom to a greater extent. In addition to students with identified disabilities, many students are considered at risk for disabilities. To provide effective instruction for this wide array of students, general educators must be armed with the knowledge and skills to provide assessment and intervention strategies that are potent, yet efficient enough to be implemented in the general education classroom . . Research evidence on effective strategies for increasing the academic achievement of students with mild disabilities in inclusion classes is limited (Fisher, Schumaker, & Deshler, 1996). Relatively few studies have been conducted in inclusion settings, and the results are often disappointing and meager (Baker & Zigmond, 1995; Zigmond et al., 1995). In a multi-state study of the effectiveness of restructuring schools to provide effective inclusion programs, nearly half of the students with mild disabilities continued to fall farther behind (Zigmond et al., 1995). Although many texts are devoted to inclusion practices (Kochhar & West, 1996; McCoy, 1995; Meyen, Vergason, & Whelan, 1996; Stainback & Stainback, 1990, 1992, 1996; Thousand, Villa, & Nevin, 1994; Villa, Thousand, Stainback, & Stainback, 1992; Wang, 1992; Zionts, 1997), few provide specific information regarding academic interventions for students with mild disabilities in the general education classroom. Lawrence (1988) does provide some basic guidelines for teachers, such as using a set schedule, developing clear rules and expectations, being consistent, providing clear directions, structuring transition times, and developing positive relationships with parents. Some instructional strategies recommended for inclusion include, but are not limited to, direct instruction for the acquisition of new skills, peer tutoring, cooperative learning, and self-instructional strategies (Lawrence, 1988; Vergason & Anderegg, 1991). In this article we will discuss inclusion intervention strategies and provide a rationale for each.
在包容性课堂中为轻度残疾学生选择教学干预措施。
在教育领域发生的许多变化中,最重要的变化之一是向包容的运动(McLeskey, Henry, & Hodges, 1998)。轻度残疾学生在通识教育课堂上得到了更大程度的服务。除了有残疾的学生外,许多学生被认为有残疾的风险。为了给广大学生提供有效的指导,通识教育工作者必须具备知识和技能,以提供有效的评估和干预策略,而这些策略又足够有效,可以在通识教育课堂上实施。关于在包容性课堂中提高轻度残疾学生学业成绩的有效策略的研究证据有限(Fisher, Schumaker, & Deshler, 1996)。在纳入环境中进行的研究相对较少,结果往往令人失望和贫乏(Baker & Zigmond, 1995;Zigmond et al., 1995)。在一项多州对重组学校以提供有效的包容性项目的有效性的研究中,近一半的轻度残疾学生继续落后(Zigmond et al., 1995)。尽管许多文本致力于包容性实践(Kochhar & West, 1996;麦科伊,1995;Meyen, Vergason, & Whelan, 1996;Stainback & Stainback, 1990,1992,1996;Thousand, Villa, & Nevin, 1994;Villa, Thousand, Stainback, & Stainback, 1992;王,1992;Zionts, 1997),很少有人提供关于在通识教育课堂上对轻度残疾学生进行学业干预的具体信息。Lawrence(1988)确实为教师提供了一些基本的指导方针,比如使用固定的时间表,制定明确的规则和期望,保持一致,提供明确的方向,组织过渡时间,以及与家长建立积极的关系。推荐的包容性教学策略包括,但不限于,获取新技能的直接指导,同伴辅导,合作学习和自我指导策略(Lawrence, 1988;Vergason & Anderegg, 1991)。在本文中,我们将讨论纳入干预策略,并提供每种策略的基本原理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信