The beginner’s odyssey: ethics, participant observation and its challenges in native ethnography

U. Ugwu
{"title":"The beginner’s odyssey: ethics, participant observation and its challenges in native ethnography","authors":"U. Ugwu","doi":"10.4314/ijma.v2i18.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classic anthropological fieldwork emphasized working „abroad‟ – that is, doing fieldwork in societies that were culturally and geographically distant from that of the ethnographer. More recent discussions of anthropological fieldwork have drawn attention to significance of working „at home‟ – including paying attention to the forms of social differentiation and marginalization present in the society to which the ethnographer belongs. There are arguments that native anthropologists are better qualified to study issues involving their group than outsiders are. This paper discusses the researcher’s field experience conducting native ethnography among the Nrobo of Southeastern Nigeria. This study adopted ethnographic methods of participant observation – adopting chitchatting and semi-structured interviews. Also, focus group discussion (FGD) was used to cross-check the validity of data from the other instrument. This study found among other things, that conducting native ethnography is a challenge to the ethnographer. The mutual intelligibility does not guarantee quick rapport instead it sets up suspicion. Furthermore, ethical issues in ethnographic research are culturally relative. The Nrobo case stipulates time value and as such reward is expected for every task that takes up their time. Also security threat poses challenges to native ethnography. This study, to the best of my knowledge, is the first attempt to conducting native ethnography among this group. As such it adds to the corpus of ethnographies on the Igbo of Southeastern Nigeria.","PeriodicalId":14088,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Modern Anthropology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Modern Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ijma.v2i18.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Classic anthropological fieldwork emphasized working „abroad‟ – that is, doing fieldwork in societies that were culturally and geographically distant from that of the ethnographer. More recent discussions of anthropological fieldwork have drawn attention to significance of working „at home‟ – including paying attention to the forms of social differentiation and marginalization present in the society to which the ethnographer belongs. There are arguments that native anthropologists are better qualified to study issues involving their group than outsiders are. This paper discusses the researcher’s field experience conducting native ethnography among the Nrobo of Southeastern Nigeria. This study adopted ethnographic methods of participant observation – adopting chitchatting and semi-structured interviews. Also, focus group discussion (FGD) was used to cross-check the validity of data from the other instrument. This study found among other things, that conducting native ethnography is a challenge to the ethnographer. The mutual intelligibility does not guarantee quick rapport instead it sets up suspicion. Furthermore, ethical issues in ethnographic research are culturally relative. The Nrobo case stipulates time value and as such reward is expected for every task that takes up their time. Also security threat poses challenges to native ethnography. This study, to the best of my knowledge, is the first attempt to conducting native ethnography among this group. As such it adds to the corpus of ethnographies on the Igbo of Southeastern Nigeria.
初学者的奥德赛:伦理学、参与者观察及其在本土民族志中的挑战
经典的人类学田野调查强调在“国外”工作——也就是说,在文化和地理上与民族志学家相距遥远的社会中进行田野调查。最近对人类学田野调查的讨论引起了人们对“在家工作”意义的关注,包括关注民族志学家所属社会中存在的社会分化和边缘化形式。有观点认为,本土人类学家比外来者更有资格研究涉及他们群体的问题。本文讨论了研究者在尼日利亚东南部的Nrobo地区进行本土民族志研究的实地经验。本研究采用了参与观察的人种学方法——闲聊和半结构化访谈。此外,焦点小组讨论(FGD)用于交叉检查来自其他工具的数据的有效性。这项研究发现,开展本土民族志研究对民族志学家来说是一项挑战。相互理解并不能保证迅速建立融洽关系,反而会引起怀疑。此外,民族志研究中的伦理问题在文化上是相对的。Nrobo案例规定了时间价值,因此,每一项占用他们时间的任务都会得到奖励。安全威胁也对本土民族志构成挑战。据我所知,这项研究是在这一群体中进行本土民族志研究的第一次尝试。因此,它增加了尼日利亚东南部伊博人的民族志语料库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信