Comparison of flower-visiting behaviour of bumblebees and swallowtail butterflies to the Japanese azalea (Rhododendron japonicum)

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Keigo D. Takahashi, T. Itino
{"title":"Comparison of flower-visiting behaviour of bumblebees and swallowtail butterflies to the Japanese azalea (Rhododendron japonicum)","authors":"Keigo D. Takahashi, T. Itino","doi":"10.26786/1920-7603(2020)595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Examination of the efficacy of pollinators that are not morphologically matched to a flower’s shape can deepen our understanding of the main pollinators of a plant species. In central Japan, Rhododendron japonicum is visited much more frequently by bumblebees than by butterflies although its flower shape is more suited for pollination by large butterflies . Here, we observed flower-visiting behaviour of Bombus diversus queens and the alpine black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio maackii, and compared their efficacy as pollinators. Papilio maackii always touched the stigma during a flower visit, whereas B. diversus queens did so during just 54% of their flower visits. As bumblebees visit neighboring flowers of a R. japonicum tree in sequence not like Papilio maackii , we hypothesized that they deliver self pollen to R. japonicum so that the fruit set would be low. However, the fruit set in a bumblebee-dominated area was 72.5%, significantly higher than that by hand-pollination with self pollen (31.4%). This suggests that R. japonicum can obtain sufficient fruits by B. diversus queens although its flower shape morphologically matches to pollination by swallowtail butterflies.","PeriodicalId":30194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pollination Ecology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pollination Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2020)595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Examination of the efficacy of pollinators that are not morphologically matched to a flower’s shape can deepen our understanding of the main pollinators of a plant species. In central Japan, Rhododendron japonicum is visited much more frequently by bumblebees than by butterflies although its flower shape is more suited for pollination by large butterflies . Here, we observed flower-visiting behaviour of Bombus diversus queens and the alpine black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio maackii, and compared their efficacy as pollinators. Papilio maackii always touched the stigma during a flower visit, whereas B. diversus queens did so during just 54% of their flower visits. As bumblebees visit neighboring flowers of a R. japonicum tree in sequence not like Papilio maackii , we hypothesized that they deliver self pollen to R. japonicum so that the fruit set would be low. However, the fruit set in a bumblebee-dominated area was 72.5%, significantly higher than that by hand-pollination with self pollen (31.4%). This suggests that R. japonicum can obtain sufficient fruits by B. diversus queens although its flower shape morphologically matches to pollination by swallowtail butterflies.
大黄蜂、燕尾蝶与日本杜鹃访花行为的比较
对形态上与花朵形状不匹配的传粉昆虫的功效进行检查,可以加深我们对植物物种主要传粉昆虫的理解。在日本中部,大黄蜂造访日本杜鹃的频率远高于蝴蝶,尽管其花朵形状更适合大型蝴蝶授粉。在这里,我们观察了斑蝶和高山黑燕尾蝶Papilio maackii的访花行为,并比较了它们作为传粉昆虫的功效。凤蝶在访花期间总是接触柱头,而B.diversus女王在访花时只有54%接触柱头。当大黄蜂以不同于凤蝶的顺序造访日本血吸虫树的相邻花朵时,我们假设它们会将自身花粉传递给日本血吸虫,因此坐果会很低。大黄蜂占优势区的坐果率为72.5%,明显高于自花粉人工授粉(31.4%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pollination Ecology
Journal of Pollination Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信