Risk factors for cesarean section in women of urban Puducherry, India: A matched case–control study

S. Rajaa, Akkilangunta Sujiv, Sitanshu Sekar Kar
{"title":"Risk factors for cesarean section in women of urban Puducherry, India: A matched case–control study","authors":"S. Rajaa, Akkilangunta Sujiv, Sitanshu Sekar Kar","doi":"10.36922/ijps.v7i1.290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cesarean section (CS) is generally performed either to ensure maternal and child safety when vaginal delivery is not possible. The WHO has indicated that CS rates of more than 10% are considered overutilization. Increased CS rates can cause an increase in postpartum antibiotic treatment and longer hospital stay. In this research, we conducted a matched case–control study, including all women who gave birth through CS and resided in the study area over a 3-year period before the survey as cases and similar age- and year-matched women who had normal vaginal delivery during the same period as controls. The data were collected using a semi-structured pro forma through personal interviews and verified with discharge cards. We obtained a sample of 140 women (70 matched cases and controls) as study participants. Our results show that unadjusted analysis revealed socioeconomic status, history of gestational diabetes mellitus, previous lower segment CS (LSCS), and malpresentation emerged as risk factors, whereas in the adjusted analysis, we observed that previous LSCS (aOR 45.4 [4.3 – 483.6]), malpresentation (aOR 11.0 [1.6 – 73.8]), and belonging to middle (aOR 3.3 [1.0 – 10.8]) and upper class (aOR 23.55 [CI: 1.2 – 463.8]) remained as independent risk factors. Our study identified independent risk factors for CS that needs to be tackled for bringing down the CS rates.","PeriodicalId":73473,"journal":{"name":"International journal of population studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of population studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36922/ijps.v7i1.290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cesarean section (CS) is generally performed either to ensure maternal and child safety when vaginal delivery is not possible. The WHO has indicated that CS rates of more than 10% are considered overutilization. Increased CS rates can cause an increase in postpartum antibiotic treatment and longer hospital stay. In this research, we conducted a matched case–control study, including all women who gave birth through CS and resided in the study area over a 3-year period before the survey as cases and similar age- and year-matched women who had normal vaginal delivery during the same period as controls. The data were collected using a semi-structured pro forma through personal interviews and verified with discharge cards. We obtained a sample of 140 women (70 matched cases and controls) as study participants. Our results show that unadjusted analysis revealed socioeconomic status, history of gestational diabetes mellitus, previous lower segment CS (LSCS), and malpresentation emerged as risk factors, whereas in the adjusted analysis, we observed that previous LSCS (aOR 45.4 [4.3 – 483.6]), malpresentation (aOR 11.0 [1.6 – 73.8]), and belonging to middle (aOR 3.3 [1.0 – 10.8]) and upper class (aOR 23.55 [CI: 1.2 – 463.8]) remained as independent risk factors. Our study identified independent risk factors for CS that needs to be tackled for bringing down the CS rates.
印度普杜切里城市妇女剖宫产的危险因素:一项匹配的病例对照研究
剖宫产术(CS)通常在无法阴道分娩时进行,以确保产妇和儿童的安全。世界卫生组织表示,CS比率超过10%被视为过度使用。CS发病率的增加会导致产后抗生素治疗的增加和住院时间的延长。在这项研究中,我们进行了一项匹配的病例对照研究,包括所有通过CS分娩并在调查前居住在研究区域超过3年的女性作为病例,以及在同一时期正常阴道分娩的年龄和年份匹配的女性作为对照。数据是通过个人访谈使用半结构化形式收集的,并用出院卡进行验证。我们获得了140名女性(70名匹配病例和对照)作为研究参与者的样本。我们的结果表明,未经调整的分析显示,社会经济地位、妊娠期糖尿病史、既往下段CS(LSCS)和表现异常是风险因素,而在经调整的研究中,我们观察到既往LSCS(aOR 45.4[4.3-483.6])、表现异常(aOR 11.0[1.6-73.8])、,属于中等(aOR 3.3[1.0–10.8])和上层(aOR 23.55[CI:1.2–463.8])仍然是独立的风险因素。我们的研究确定了CS的独立风险因素,需要解决这些因素以降低CS发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信