{"title":"Crisis epistemologies: a case for queer feminist digital ethnography","authors":"Shraddha Chatterjee","doi":"10.1080/09589236.2023.2179606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Crisis marks our lives more than ever before. It defines the ongoing violence of capitalism, nationalism, neoliberalism, gendered and racialized oppressions, and life in the era of the Anthropocene. In addition to this, crisis plays a crucial role in queer and trans studies, which seeks to expose the crises inherent to regimes of ‘normativity’. Within this context, this article asks – what constitutes crisis epistemologies? How can we study the unpredictable effects of ongoing crises? What are the ethical imperatives of such research? I argue that queer feminist digital ethnographies can be one method to map crisis epistemologies, for three reasons. First, the interdisciplinarity of queer feminist digital ethnographies attunes them to the messiness of crisis. Second, these ethnographies reimagine the field as a rhizomatic network, enabling a mapping of how crisis resignifies relationalities. Third, queer feminist digital ethnographies deploy practices of speculation and fabulation that trace the ongoing resignations of crises alongside building imaginations of worlds without crises, therefore acting as a tool that constructs transformative futures.","PeriodicalId":15911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gender Studies","volume":"32 1","pages":"486 - 497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gender Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2023.2179606","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Crisis marks our lives more than ever before. It defines the ongoing violence of capitalism, nationalism, neoliberalism, gendered and racialized oppressions, and life in the era of the Anthropocene. In addition to this, crisis plays a crucial role in queer and trans studies, which seeks to expose the crises inherent to regimes of ‘normativity’. Within this context, this article asks – what constitutes crisis epistemologies? How can we study the unpredictable effects of ongoing crises? What are the ethical imperatives of such research? I argue that queer feminist digital ethnographies can be one method to map crisis epistemologies, for three reasons. First, the interdisciplinarity of queer feminist digital ethnographies attunes them to the messiness of crisis. Second, these ethnographies reimagine the field as a rhizomatic network, enabling a mapping of how crisis resignifies relationalities. Third, queer feminist digital ethnographies deploy practices of speculation and fabulation that trace the ongoing resignations of crises alongside building imaginations of worlds without crises, therefore acting as a tool that constructs transformative futures.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gender Studies is an interdisciplinary journal which publishes articles relating to gender from a feminist perspective covering a wide range of subject areas including the Social and Natural Sciences, Arts and Popular Culture. Reviews of books and details of forthcoming conferences are also included. The Journal of Gender Studies seeks articles from international sources and aims to take account of a diversity of cultural backgrounds and differences in sexual orientation. It encourages contributions which focus on the experiences of both women and men and welcomes articles, written from a feminist perspective, relating to femininity and masculinity and to the social constructions of relationships between men and women.