Correlation of palatal volume with nasopharyngeal volume on computed tomography scans of an Iranian subpopulation

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ali Moshajari, Azin Irannezhad, Z. Kajan, N. K. Nasab, E. Rafiei, Pejman Kiani
{"title":"Correlation of palatal volume with nasopharyngeal volume on computed tomography scans of an Iranian subpopulation","authors":"Ali Moshajari, Azin Irannezhad, Z. Kajan, N. K. Nasab, E. Rafiei, Pejman Kiani","doi":"10.1080/13440241.2020.1712822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose: The nasopharynx is a common site of airway obstruction; thus, it is important to assess the nasopharyngeal airway dimensions. This study aimed to assess the correlation of the palatal volume with the nasopharyngeal volume on computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with different facial morphological patterns. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 93 CT scans of patients. The patients were divided into three groups based on the ANB angle, namely class I (2°≤ANB≤4°), class II (ANB>4°) and class III (ANB<2°). According to the lower anterior facial height/anterior facial height ratio, the patients were divided into three groups of high angle (hyperdivergent, >0.55), low angle (hypodivergent, <0.55) and normal (0.55). The CT scans of patients were analysed to measure the nasopharyngeal volume, palatal volume, palatal height, maxillary width, intercanine width and intermolar width. Data were analysed using the Pearson’s correlation test, ANOVA, independent t-test and Kruskal–Wallis test. Results: No significant correlation existed between the palatal volume and the nasopharyngeal volume (P = 0.806). The maxillary width (P = 0.971), palatal height (P = 0.945), intercanine width (P = 0.320) and intermolar width (P = 0.478) had no significant correlation with the nasopharyngeal volume either. The nasopharyngeal volume was not significantly different in the three classes of malocclusion (P = 0.987) and different facial height patterns (P = 0.331). Conclusion: The palatal volume had no significant correlation with the nasopharyngeal volume. The nasopharyngeal volume was not significantly different in patients with different patterns of facial morphology.","PeriodicalId":43169,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontic Waves","volume":"79 1","pages":"31 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13440241.2020.1712822","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontic Waves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13440241.2020.1712822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: The nasopharynx is a common site of airway obstruction; thus, it is important to assess the nasopharyngeal airway dimensions. This study aimed to assess the correlation of the palatal volume with the nasopharyngeal volume on computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with different facial morphological patterns. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 93 CT scans of patients. The patients were divided into three groups based on the ANB angle, namely class I (2°≤ANB≤4°), class II (ANB>4°) and class III (ANB<2°). According to the lower anterior facial height/anterior facial height ratio, the patients were divided into three groups of high angle (hyperdivergent, >0.55), low angle (hypodivergent, <0.55) and normal (0.55). The CT scans of patients were analysed to measure the nasopharyngeal volume, palatal volume, palatal height, maxillary width, intercanine width and intermolar width. Data were analysed using the Pearson’s correlation test, ANOVA, independent t-test and Kruskal–Wallis test. Results: No significant correlation existed between the palatal volume and the nasopharyngeal volume (P = 0.806). The maxillary width (P = 0.971), palatal height (P = 0.945), intercanine width (P = 0.320) and intermolar width (P = 0.478) had no significant correlation with the nasopharyngeal volume either. The nasopharyngeal volume was not significantly different in the three classes of malocclusion (P = 0.987) and different facial height patterns (P = 0.331). Conclusion: The palatal volume had no significant correlation with the nasopharyngeal volume. The nasopharyngeal volume was not significantly different in patients with different patterns of facial morphology.
伊朗亚群计算机断层扫描中腭体积与鼻咽体积的相关性
摘要目的:鼻咽部是气道梗阻的常见部位;因此,评估鼻咽气道的尺寸是很重要的。本研究旨在评估不同面部形态患者的腭体积与鼻咽体积在计算机断层扫描(CT)上的相关性。材料和方法:本横断面研究评估了93例患者的CT扫描。根据ANB角度将患者分为I类(2°≤ANB≤4°)、II类(ANB> ~ 4°)和III类(ANB0.55)、低角(低发散,<0.55)和正常(0.55)三组。对患者的CT扫描结果进行分析,测量鼻咽容积、腭容积、腭高、上颌宽度、犬齿间宽度和磨牙间宽度。数据分析采用Pearson相关检验、方差分析、独立t检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验。结果:腭容积与鼻咽容积无显著相关性(P = 0.806)。上颌宽度(P = 0.971)、腭高(P = 0.945)、犬齿间宽度(P = 0.320)、磨牙间宽度(P = 0.478)与鼻咽容积也无显著相关性。鼻咽容积在三类错颌和不同面部高度类型间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.987)。结论:腭容积与鼻咽容积无显著相关性。不同面部形态患者的鼻咽容积无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthodontic Waves
Orthodontic Waves DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Orthodontic Waves is the official publication of the Japanese Orthodontic Society. The aim of this journal is to foster the advancement of orthodontic research and practice. The journal seeks to publish original articles (i) definitive reports of wide interest to the orthodontic community, (ii) Case Reports and (iii) Short Communications. Research papers stand on the scientific basis of orthodontics. Clinical topics covered include all techniques and approaches to treatment planning. All submissions are subject to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信