Characteristics of panicle stem growth and flowering period of the parents of hybrid rice in machine-transplanted seed production

Qin Qin, Youde Tao, Bang-Chao Huang, Hui Li, Yun Gao, Xiao-yuan Zhong, Zhonglin Zhou, Li Zhu, X. Lei, Sheng-Qiang Feng, Xu Wang, W. Ren
{"title":"Characteristics of panicle stem growth and flowering period of the parents of hybrid rice in machine-transplanted seed production","authors":"Qin Qin, Youde Tao, Bang-Chao Huang, Hui Li, Yun Gao, Xiao-yuan Zhong, Zhonglin Zhou, Li Zhu, X. Lei, Sheng-Qiang Feng, Xu Wang, W. Ren","doi":"10.3724/sp.j.1006.2022.12020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": To study the characteristics of panicle and stem growth and flowering period of restorer line and sterile line under mechanized transplanting mode, and to analyze the reasons for the difficulty of parental flowering period meeting under mechanized transplanting mode Chenghui 727×Shu 21A and Yahui 2115×Yixiang 1A were selected as the materials, and the field ex-periment was carried out from 2019 to 2020 in this study. Two transplanting methods and seedling ages were determined. Leaf age dynamics, panicle stem growth dynamics, and heading dynamics of restorer line and sterile line were investigated, and the effects of different treatments on the growth and development of panicle, line were statistically analyzed. The results were as follows: (1) The total number of leaves in mechanical transplanting parents decreased by 0.3–0.8 leaves in restorer lines while the sterile line added 0.1–0.4 leaves. Meanwhile, the total number of leaves in restorer lines decreased with the decrease of seedling age, while there was no significant change in the total number of leaves of male sterile lines. (2) The growth process of panicles, stems and leaves of restorer lines in mechanical transplanting was delayed by 2–5 days, while that of sterile lines was delayed by 5–10 days. The panicle differentiation of restorer lines began after jointing, while the panicle differentiation of sterile lines began 5–10 days after jointing. The panicle differentiation duration of restorer lines and sterile lines did not change significantly. The young ear growth curves of all treated parents were well fitted with Logistic curves ( R 2 >0.99). (3) The duration from seeding to heading of machine transplanting parents was longer than that of artificial transplanting parents. The effect of lengthening seedling age was the same as the change of transplanting method and the response of sterile lines to transplanting method and seedling age was more significant than that of restorer lines. (4) The flower encounter index of long seedling age under artificial transplanting in each combination was 100%, and the flower encounter was the best. Flowering encountering index was between 40%–60% of long seedling age under mechanical transplanting and short seedling age under artificial transplanting, followed by flowering status. However, the flowering index of the short seedling age combination of Chenghui 727 × Shu 21A and Yahui 2115 × Yixiang 1A was 0 and 18.18% under mechanical transplanting, respectively, indicat-ing that the absent of flowering date seriously. In conclusion, the growth and development of ear, stem, and leaf of parents were delayed under mechanized transplanting mode, and the prolonged seedling age aggravated the growth and development lag phe-nomenon of parents. There were some differences in the growth, development, and flowering characteristics between restorer lines and sterile lines under different transplanting methods and seedling ages. The difference in the response of restorer lines and sterile lines to cultivation measures was the main reason for the absence of flowering dates of parents.","PeriodicalId":52132,"journal":{"name":"作物学报","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"作物学报","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1006.2022.12020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: To study the characteristics of panicle and stem growth and flowering period of restorer line and sterile line under mechanized transplanting mode, and to analyze the reasons for the difficulty of parental flowering period meeting under mechanized transplanting mode Chenghui 727×Shu 21A and Yahui 2115×Yixiang 1A were selected as the materials, and the field ex-periment was carried out from 2019 to 2020 in this study. Two transplanting methods and seedling ages were determined. Leaf age dynamics, panicle stem growth dynamics, and heading dynamics of restorer line and sterile line were investigated, and the effects of different treatments on the growth and development of panicle, line were statistically analyzed. The results were as follows: (1) The total number of leaves in mechanical transplanting parents decreased by 0.3–0.8 leaves in restorer lines while the sterile line added 0.1–0.4 leaves. Meanwhile, the total number of leaves in restorer lines decreased with the decrease of seedling age, while there was no significant change in the total number of leaves of male sterile lines. (2) The growth process of panicles, stems and leaves of restorer lines in mechanical transplanting was delayed by 2–5 days, while that of sterile lines was delayed by 5–10 days. The panicle differentiation of restorer lines began after jointing, while the panicle differentiation of sterile lines began 5–10 days after jointing. The panicle differentiation duration of restorer lines and sterile lines did not change significantly. The young ear growth curves of all treated parents were well fitted with Logistic curves ( R 2 >0.99). (3) The duration from seeding to heading of machine transplanting parents was longer than that of artificial transplanting parents. The effect of lengthening seedling age was the same as the change of transplanting method and the response of sterile lines to transplanting method and seedling age was more significant than that of restorer lines. (4) The flower encounter index of long seedling age under artificial transplanting in each combination was 100%, and the flower encounter was the best. Flowering encountering index was between 40%–60% of long seedling age under mechanical transplanting and short seedling age under artificial transplanting, followed by flowering status. However, the flowering index of the short seedling age combination of Chenghui 727 × Shu 21A and Yahui 2115 × Yixiang 1A was 0 and 18.18% under mechanical transplanting, respectively, indicat-ing that the absent of flowering date seriously. In conclusion, the growth and development of ear, stem, and leaf of parents were delayed under mechanized transplanting mode, and the prolonged seedling age aggravated the growth and development lag phe-nomenon of parents. There were some differences in the growth, development, and flowering characteristics between restorer lines and sterile lines under different transplanting methods and seedling ages. The difference in the response of restorer lines and sterile lines to cultivation measures was the main reason for the absence of flowering dates of parents.
机种生产中杂交稻亲本穗茎生长及花期特征
为研究机械化移栽模式下恢复系和不育系穗茎生长和花期特征,分析机械化移栽模式下亲本花期难以满足的原因,本研究选择成辉727×Shu 21A和雅辉2115×Yixiang 1A为材料,于2019 - 2020年进行田间试验。确定了两种移栽方式和苗龄。研究了恢复系和不育系的叶龄动态、穗茎生长动态和抽穗动态,并统计分析了不同处理对穗、系生长发育的影响。结果表明:(1)恢复系机械移栽亲本叶片总数减少0.3 ~ 0.8片,不育系增加0.1 ~ 0.4片;同时,恢复系叶片总数随苗龄的降低而减少,而雄性不育系叶片总数变化不显著。(2)机械移栽恢复系穗、茎、叶的生长过程延迟2 ~ 5 d,不育系延迟5 ~ 10 d。恢复系穗部分化在拔节后开始,不育系穗部分化在拔节后5 ~ 10 d开始。恢复系和不育系的穗分化期变化不显著。各处理亲本幼穗生长曲线均符合Logistic曲线(R = 0.99)。(3)机插亲本从播种期到抽穗期比人工移栽亲本长。延长苗龄的效果与移栽方式的变化相同,不育系对移栽方式和苗龄的反应比恢复系更显著。(4)人工插秧下各组合长苗龄的遇花指数均为100%,遇花效果最好。机械移栽苗龄长、人工移栽苗龄短的开花偶遇指数在40% ~ 60%之间,其次是开花状态。而成辉727 ×曙21A和亚辉2115 ×宜香1A短苗龄组合在机械移栽下的开花指数分别为0和18.18%,说明开花日期缺失严重。综上所述,机械化移栽方式使亲本穗、茎、叶的生长发育延迟,苗龄延长加剧了亲本生长发育滞后现象。在不同移栽方式和苗龄下,恢复系和不育系的生长发育和开花特性存在一定差异。恢复系和不育系对栽培措施的反应差异是造成亲本开花日期缺失的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
作物学报
作物学报 Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
期刊介绍: The major aims of AAS are to report the progresses in the disciplines of crop breeding, crop genetics, crop cultivation, crop physiology, ecology, biochemistry, germplasm resources, grain chemistry, grain storage and processing, bio-technology and biomathematics etc. mainly in China and abroad. AAS provides regular columns for Original papers, Reviews, and Research notes. The strict peer-review procedure guarantees the academic level and raises the reputation of the journal. The readership of AAS is for crop science researchers, students of agricultural colleges and universities, and persons with similar academic level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信