Manning Clark’s Repudiation of Anglicanism and the Appeal of ‘Sentimental Humanism’ in his Quest for Grace

IF 0.4 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
J. Moses
{"title":"Manning Clark’s Repudiation of Anglicanism and the Appeal of ‘Sentimental Humanism’ in his Quest for Grace","authors":"J. Moses","doi":"10.1017/s1740355323000153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Manning Clark is regarded as a pioneer of Australian national history. His output has been unequalled but it has provoked a vigorous division of opinions concerning its accuracy and the all-pervading thesis that Australia, to achieve its true national self-perception, must throw off the British heritage that included the baleful influence of the Anglicanism in which Clark was raised by his priest father. Here the work of three key scholarly critics, namely Dr George Shaw, Professor Brian Fletcher and Professor Alan Atkinson is evaluated, all of whom are Anglican historians of Australia. They have made very different assessments of the evolution of Australian national identity and the permanence of the British heritage. Shaw, as a former student of Clark, has assessed his mentor’s work not as rigorous history but essentially as ‘sentimental humanism’. As well, the opportunity is taken to reflect on the two extensive biographies of Clark, namely by Brian Matthews and Mark McKenna. Both these men were educated as Roman Catholics at a time when Rome was decidedly allergic to the idea of ecumenical outreach. Consequently, it is argued here that an accurate assessment of Manning Clark’s oeuvre is yet to be accomplished.","PeriodicalId":40751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anglican Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anglican Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1740355323000153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Manning Clark is regarded as a pioneer of Australian national history. His output has been unequalled but it has provoked a vigorous division of opinions concerning its accuracy and the all-pervading thesis that Australia, to achieve its true national self-perception, must throw off the British heritage that included the baleful influence of the Anglicanism in which Clark was raised by his priest father. Here the work of three key scholarly critics, namely Dr George Shaw, Professor Brian Fletcher and Professor Alan Atkinson is evaluated, all of whom are Anglican historians of Australia. They have made very different assessments of the evolution of Australian national identity and the permanence of the British heritage. Shaw, as a former student of Clark, has assessed his mentor’s work not as rigorous history but essentially as ‘sentimental humanism’. As well, the opportunity is taken to reflect on the two extensive biographies of Clark, namely by Brian Matthews and Mark McKenna. Both these men were educated as Roman Catholics at a time when Rome was decidedly allergic to the idea of ecumenical outreach. Consequently, it is argued here that an accurate assessment of Manning Clark’s oeuvre is yet to be accomplished.
曼宁-克拉克对英国圣公会的批判与《恩典的追寻》中“感性人道主义”的诉求
曼宁·克拉克被认为是澳大利亚民族史的先驱。他的作品是无与伦比的,但它引发了激烈的意见分歧,关于它的准确性和普遍存在的论点,即澳大利亚要实现真正的国家自我认知,必须摆脱英国传统,包括英国国教的有害影响,克拉克是在他的牧师父亲的影响下长大的。在这里,三位重要的学术评论家,即乔治·肖博士,布赖恩·弗莱彻教授和艾伦·阿特金森教授的工作进行了评估,他们都是澳大利亚圣公会历史学家。他们对澳大利亚民族认同的演变和英国遗产的持久性做出了截然不同的评估。作为克拉克以前的学生,肖评价他的导师的作品不是严谨的历史,而是本质上的“感性的人文主义”。同时,我们也借此机会回顾了布莱恩·马修斯(Brian Matthews)和马克·麦肯纳(Mark McKenna)撰写的克拉克的两本长篇传记。这两个人都是作为罗马天主教徒接受教育的,而当时罗马显然对大公教会外展的想法过敏。因此,本文认为,对曼宁·克拉克的全部作品的准确评估尚未完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信