Reducing the carbon footprint of a German university hospital: Perspectives from hospital stakeholders

Claudia Quitmann, Rainer Sauerborn, Ina Danquah, Alina Herrmann
{"title":"Reducing the carbon footprint of a German university hospital: Perspectives from hospital stakeholders","authors":"Claudia Quitmann,&nbsp;Rainer Sauerborn,&nbsp;Ina Danquah,&nbsp;Alina Herrmann","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2023.100247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Climate change threatens physical and mental health. Hospitals have a key role in adapting to these impacts. At the same time, hospitals contribute to climate change due to their greenhouse gas emissions. To effectively reduce these emissions, stakeholder involvement is important. This study aimed at identifying possible mitigation measures, barriers, and enablers for their implementation from stakeholders’ perspectives in a German university hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We conducted a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews at Heidelberg University Hospital. The participants’ selection was based on purposive maximum variation sampling. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the framework approach, supported by NVivo.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five patients, twelve clinical and twelve administrative employees at different hierarchical levels were interviewed. Stakeholders suggested various possible mitigation measures. Only a few of them were specific to hospitals. Enablers and barriers were attributed to the structural, organizational, mitigation measure, and stakeholder levels. Common barriers on these levels were non-demanding policies, the complexity of organizational structures, the perceived risk of reduced healthcare performance, and lack of awareness and prioritization. Participants formulated enablers, e.g., knowing best-practice examples or hiring a sustainability manager. However, enablers were mostly hypothetical and based on perceived barriers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Profound changes in regulatory frameworks and organizational management would support stakeholders at the investigated hospital in implementing mitigation measures. Furthermore, intensified research about climate-friendly health care and communication of these findings to hospital stakeholders as well as integration of these findings into curricula of the health workforce seems necessary for the climate-friendly transformation of hospitals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278223000470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction

Climate change threatens physical and mental health. Hospitals have a key role in adapting to these impacts. At the same time, hospitals contribute to climate change due to their greenhouse gas emissions. To effectively reduce these emissions, stakeholder involvement is important. This study aimed at identifying possible mitigation measures, barriers, and enablers for their implementation from stakeholders’ perspectives in a German university hospital.

Materials and methods

We conducted a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews at Heidelberg University Hospital. The participants’ selection was based on purposive maximum variation sampling. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the framework approach, supported by NVivo.

Results

Five patients, twelve clinical and twelve administrative employees at different hierarchical levels were interviewed. Stakeholders suggested various possible mitigation measures. Only a few of them were specific to hospitals. Enablers and barriers were attributed to the structural, organizational, mitigation measure, and stakeholder levels. Common barriers on these levels were non-demanding policies, the complexity of organizational structures, the perceived risk of reduced healthcare performance, and lack of awareness and prioritization. Participants formulated enablers, e.g., knowing best-practice examples or hiring a sustainability manager. However, enablers were mostly hypothetical and based on perceived barriers.

Conclusion

Profound changes in regulatory frameworks and organizational management would support stakeholders at the investigated hospital in implementing mitigation measures. Furthermore, intensified research about climate-friendly health care and communication of these findings to hospital stakeholders as well as integration of these findings into curricula of the health workforce seems necessary for the climate-friendly transformation of hospitals.

减少德国大学医院的碳足迹:来自医院利益相关者的观点
气候变化威胁着身心健康。医院在适应这些影响方面发挥着关键作用。与此同时,医院因其温室气体排放而加剧了气候变化。为了有效地减少这些排放,利益相关者的参与非常重要。本研究旨在从利益相关者的角度确定德国某大学医院可能实施的缓解措施、障碍和促成因素。材料和方法我们在海德堡大学医院进行了一项半结构化访谈的定性研究。参与者的选择是基于有目的的最大变异抽样。访谈被逐字记录下来,并在NVivo的支持下使用框架方法进行分析。结果对5名患者、12名临床人员和12名不同层次的行政人员进行了访谈。利益攸关方提出了各种可能的缓解措施。其中只有少数是针对医院的。促成因素和障碍归因于结构、组织、缓解措施和涉众级别。这些级别上的常见障碍是要求不高的政策、组织结构的复杂性、医疗保健绩效下降的感知风险,以及缺乏意识和优先级。参与者制定了促成因素,例如了解最佳实践案例或雇用可持续发展经理。然而,促成因素大多是假设的,并且基于可感知的障碍。结论监管框架和组织管理的深刻变革将支持被调查医院的利益相关者实施缓解措施。此外,加强对气候友好型卫生保健的研究,将这些研究结果传达给医院利益相关者,并将这些研究结果纳入卫生人力的课程,似乎是医院气候友好型转型的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信