Regulating hate speech and disinformation online while protecting freedom of speech as an equal and positive right – comparing Germany, Europe and the United States

Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17577632.2022.2083679

Mathias Hong

引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT When regulating hate speech and disinformation online, first, do not suppress ideas or viewpoints as such, second, protect speech and other fundamental rights as positive freedoms, not only vertically but horizontally too, and, third, counteract private disinformation as well as government disinformation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

规范网上的仇恨言论和虚假信息，同时保护言论自由作为一项平等和积极的权利——比较德国、欧洲和美国

当监管仇恨言论和虚假信息时，首先，不要压制这样的想法或观点;其次，保护言论和其他基本权利作为积极的自由，不仅在垂直上，而且在水平上也是如此;第三，抵制私人虚假信息和政府虚假信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Media Law Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The only platform for focused, rigorous analysis of global developments in media law, this peer-reviewed journal, launched in Summer 2009, is: essential for teaching and research, essential for practice, essential for policy-making. It turns the spotlight on all those aspects of law which impinge on and shape modern media practices - from regulation and ownership, to libel law and constitutional aspects of broadcasting such as free speech and privacy, obscenity laws, copyright, piracy, and other aspects of IT law. The result is the first journal to take a serious view of law through the lens. The first issues feature articles on a wide range of topics such as: Developments in Defamation · Balancing Freedom of Expression and Privacy in the European Court of Human Rights · The Future of Public Television · Cameras in the Courtroom - Media Access to Classified Documents · Advertising Revenue v Editorial Independence · Gordon Ramsay: Obscenity Regulation Pioneer?