Comparative research of quality indicators of measuring instruments: practical aspects

IF 0.1 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
O. Velychko, T. Gordiyenko
{"title":"Comparative research of quality indicators of measuring instruments: practical aspects","authors":"O. Velychko, T. Gordiyenko","doi":"10.24027/2306-7039.3.2021.241620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of modern measuring instrument MI is to perform accurate and reliable measurements in order to obtain complete and reliable measurement information. The MI must be of proper quality, which must be reliably assessed. For technical means, traditional quality indicators have been established, some of which are common to MI. The metrological characteristic is unique to a MI and can be considered one of the most important of MI indicators. \nThe quality of MI is characterized by a certain system of quality indicators. Depending on MI group, the system of quality indicators can differ. The target indicators are specific for each type of product. These indicators require additional analysis. The main metrological characteristics should be referred to the target indicators of MI. For some MI categories, additional indicators can be established, and for others, they are excluded. \nThe methodology of evaluation of MI quality indicators and algorithm of its realization are offered. The digital multimeters as category of MI have been selected for practical comparative evaluation of MI quality indicators. The ten indicators for this category of MI have been refined. Comparative expert evaluation of quality indicators of 12 multimeters was carried out with the involvement of a group of 34 metrology experts. The weight of each of the 10 selected MI quality indicators was determined. The results of expert evaluation of multimeter are presented.","PeriodicalId":40775,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Metrological Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Metrological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24027/2306-7039.3.2021.241620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main purpose of modern measuring instrument MI is to perform accurate and reliable measurements in order to obtain complete and reliable measurement information. The MI must be of proper quality, which must be reliably assessed. For technical means, traditional quality indicators have been established, some of which are common to MI. The metrological characteristic is unique to a MI and can be considered one of the most important of MI indicators. The quality of MI is characterized by a certain system of quality indicators. Depending on MI group, the system of quality indicators can differ. The target indicators are specific for each type of product. These indicators require additional analysis. The main metrological characteristics should be referred to the target indicators of MI. For some MI categories, additional indicators can be established, and for others, they are excluded. The methodology of evaluation of MI quality indicators and algorithm of its realization are offered. The digital multimeters as category of MI have been selected for practical comparative evaluation of MI quality indicators. The ten indicators for this category of MI have been refined. Comparative expert evaluation of quality indicators of 12 multimeters was carried out with the involvement of a group of 34 metrology experts. The weight of each of the 10 selected MI quality indicators was determined. The results of expert evaluation of multimeter are presented.
测量仪器质量指标的比较研究:实用方面
现代测量仪器MI的主要目的是进行准确可靠的测量,以获得完整可靠的测量信息。MI必须具有适当的质量,并且必须可靠地进行评估。在技术手段上,已经建立了传统的质量指标,其中一些是MI所共有的。计量特性是MI所独有的,可以认为是MI最重要的指标之一。机械工程的质量具有一定的质量指标体系。根据MI组的不同,质量指标体系可能有所不同。每种产品的目标指标都是特定的。这些指标需要进一步分析。主要计量特征参照MI的目标指标。对于MI的某些类别,可以建立额外的指标,对于其他类别,可以排除。给出了机械制造质量指标的评价方法及其实现算法。选择数字万用表作为智能仪表的类别,对智能仪表的质量指标进行了实际比较评价。这一类MI的10个指标已加以改进。在34名计量专家的参与下,对12个万用表的质量指标进行了比较专家评价。确定10个选定的MI质量指标的权重。介绍了专家对万用表的评价结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ukrainian Metrological Journal
Ukrainian Metrological Journal INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信