The Impact of Online vs Blended Clinical Skill Laboratory Learning on Student Academic Performance: A Case Study in Indonesia.

American journal of medicine open Pub Date : 2023-08-26 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100054
Zulvikar Syambani Ulhaq, Ferry Nur Nasyroh, Amalia Nur Aisa, Achmad Arief Hidayatullah, Lola Ayu Istifiani, Syafrizal Aji Pamungkas, Achmad Rilyadi Sholeh, Gita Vita Soraya
{"title":"The Impact of Online vs Blended Clinical Skill Laboratory Learning on Student Academic Performance: A Case Study in Indonesia.","authors":"Zulvikar Syambani Ulhaq, Ferry Nur Nasyroh, Amalia Nur Aisa, Achmad Arief Hidayatullah, Lola Ayu Istifiani, Syafrizal Aji Pamungkas, Achmad Rilyadi Sholeh, Gita Vita Soraya","doi":"10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Online and blended learning methods have experienced rapid growth in higher education due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study aimed to compare students' academic performance between online and blended Clinical Skill Laboratories (CSL) learning in undergraduate medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 101 undergraduate medical students at Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University, Malang, Indonesia, were enrolled (50 students from the academic year 2020 [group 1: online CSL]; 51 students from the academic year 2020 [group 2: blended CSL]). The main outcome was students' academic performance collected from the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) score. Additionally, students also completed an evaluation questionnaire to assess the quality of the learning scheme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups agreed that CSL is an important subject and clinical video demonstration is useful for their OSCE preparation. However, students who received online learning felt that online CSL was ineffective and scored lower in the OSCE compared to the blended CSL. Qualitative data also supported these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blended learning provides more value than online learning in terms of teaching clinical skills for undergraduate medical students. Additionally, online CSL may not be sufficient for medical students to attain critical skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":72168,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medicine open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11256266/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medicine open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Online and blended learning methods have experienced rapid growth in higher education due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study aimed to compare students' academic performance between online and blended Clinical Skill Laboratories (CSL) learning in undergraduate medical students.

Methods: A total of 101 undergraduate medical students at Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University, Malang, Indonesia, were enrolled (50 students from the academic year 2020 [group 1: online CSL]; 51 students from the academic year 2020 [group 2: blended CSL]). The main outcome was students' academic performance collected from the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) score. Additionally, students also completed an evaluation questionnaire to assess the quality of the learning scheme.

Results: Both groups agreed that CSL is an important subject and clinical video demonstration is useful for their OSCE preparation. However, students who received online learning felt that online CSL was ineffective and scored lower in the OSCE compared to the blended CSL. Qualitative data also supported these findings.

Conclusion: Blended learning provides more value than online learning in terms of teaching clinical skills for undergraduate medical students. Additionally, online CSL may not be sufficient for medical students to attain critical skills.

在线与混合临床技能实验室(CSL)学习对学生学业成绩的影响:印度尼西亚的案例研究
目的:由于 COVID-19 的流行,在线和混合式学习方法在高等教育中得到了快速发展。我们的研究旨在比较医学本科生在线学习和混合式临床技能实验室(CSL)学习的学生学业成绩:印度尼西亚玛琅毛拉纳-马利克-易卜拉欣国立伊斯兰大学(Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University, Malang, Indonesia)共招收了101名医学本科生(2020学年50人[第一组:在线CSL];2020学年51人[第二组:混合CSL])。主要结果是从客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)成绩中收集的学生学习成绩。此外,学生还填写了一份评估问卷,以评估学习计划的质量:结果:两组学生都认为 CSL 是一门重要的学科,临床视频演示对他们的 OSCE 准备很有帮助。然而,与混合式 CSL 相比,接受在线学习的学生认为在线 CSL 效果不佳,在 OSCE 中得分较低。定性数据也支持这些发现:结论:就本科医学生的临床技能教学而言,混合式学习比在线学习更有价值。此外,在线 CSL 可能不足以让医学生获得关键技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of medicine open
American journal of medicine open Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信